Thread: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 31 of 31
  1. #21 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    Donating Users gtpsleeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Lawrence, Kansas, United States
    Posts
    1,351
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    BTW... your timing is going to show what it is and not necessarily whats programed into the tables. IE, if youre showing 8* KR and 9* command timing, that means the table is set for 17* for that specific cell, not 9*(17-8=9)...
    "My car is a racecar like Planet Fitness is a gym...."

    proud mark VIII victim!!! suck it...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #22 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    GT Level Member fri3dchick3n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    430
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I see what you're saying. But when I was WOT I had 0 KR and 9* Timing : /.
    99 GTP: 3.4'' MPS, Overkill PCM, Intake, Catless SD Headers, TransGo Shift Kit, 180º Thermostat, Flipped Dog Bones
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #23 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    Donating Users gtpsleeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Lawrence, Kansas, United States
    Posts
    1,351
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by fri3dchick3n View Post
    I see what you're saying. But when I was WOT I had 0 KR and 9* Timing : /.
    "My car is a racecar like Planet Fitness is a gym...."

    proud mark VIII victim!!! suck it...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #24 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    GTP Level Member FriboRage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    915
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Received)
    13
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    That made me choke on my water, and wake the dog up, thanks.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    2004 Grand Prix GTP Comp G: Intake, F+R plogs + downpipe, 1.7 YT Rollers, Overkill, F-body front brakes, drilled/slotted r1 concept rotors.
    Sport Edition Kv5 18x8
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #25 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    GT Level Member fri3dchick3n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    430
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Haha that made me laugh. I found out some tuners temporarily install widebands fir the tuning session. So I'm going to call up the guy who rallied my tune and ask if he did that. Cuz my exhaust sounds like garbage now...
    99 GTP: 3.4'' MPS, Overkill PCM, Intake, Catless SD Headers, TransGo Shift Kit, 180º Thermostat, Flipped Dog Bones
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #26 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    GT Level Member fri3dchick3n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    430
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Ok so I talked to the guy who tuned my car. He said he leaned the car out by injector pulse and injector size. Was that a bad idea?

    I have a AEM Uego on the way and can properly determine the AFR hopefully.
    99 GTP: 3.4'' MPS, Overkill PCM, Intake, Catless SD Headers, TransGo Shift Kit, 180º Thermostat, Flipped Dog Bones
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #27 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    GT Level Member jlgp2007nc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    482
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by fri3dchick3n View Post
    Ok so I talked to the guy who tuned my car. He said he leaned the car out by injector pulse and injector size. Was that a bad idea?
    Yup
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #28 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    GT Level Member fri3dchick3n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    430
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Well let's just hope the wideband will improve my tune
    99 GTP: 3.4'' MPS, Overkill PCM, Intake, Catless SD Headers, TransGo Shift Kit, 180º Thermostat, Flipped Dog Bones
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #29 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    GT Level Member fri3dchick3n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    430
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Finally got to install my AEM Wideband.

    Idle: 14.4-15.5 ..... Im guessing not too important at idle?
    WOT: 10.9-11.2 ..... ??? Rich?


    My tuner hasn't gotten back to me yet, Should I tell him to restore everything on the Throttle Enrichment table and tune it through the MAF. Or do I have this mixed up? I do NOT know how to tune so this is all new and confusing for me.

    Any feedback will be awesome. Thanks
    99 GTP: 3.4'' MPS, Overkill PCM, Intake, Catless SD Headers, TransGo Shift Kit, 180º Thermostat, Flipped Dog Bones
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #30 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    GTP Level Member L36 Killer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    597
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Positive fuel trims is the PCM "seeing" a lean condition and adding fuel. Negative trims is the PCM "seeing" a rich condition and reducing fuel.
    "SHELLY" GRAND PRIX GT 02. SLP HEADERS & EXHAUST, K&N CAI, BMR REAR SUSPENSION AND STRUT BRACES, 180 T-STAT, AGX STRUTS, EIBACH SPRINGS, OVERKILL PCM, YELLA TERRA 1.7 ROCKERS, GT1 CAM, SEXMAN PORTED & POLISHED HEADS, STAGE 2 PORTED TB
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #31 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    those WOT readings (if they are consistent) are in the ball park of where you'd want them to be conservatively.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Key Stuck, Car Dead, and...Battery Good, Alternater good
    By izzy in forum Introductions/Noob Questions
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-14-2014, 11:13 PM
  2. HID's worth it? Hi/low/fog necessary? Good brands, with good prices?
    By chamilton89 in forum Audio, Security & Visual Electronics
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: 08-06-2012, 09:10 PM
  3. Is it still any good?
    By SDGTP99 in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-02-2011, 11:01 PM
  4. Would this look good, really good, okish, bad, or really bad?
    By Jakescoots in forum Visual/Body Modifications
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-02-2011, 06:21 PM
  5. Good bye :(
    By 98GPGT in forum Off Topic Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-21-2008, 01:44 AM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •