Thread: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 31
  1. #1 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    GT Level Member fri3dchick3n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    430
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Ok so I recently installed a Stage 2 Snow Performance Boost Cooler on my 99 Grand Prix GTP and dropped the pulley size to a 3.4. I got my car retuned for it and my car seems to be slower... Lol. I talked to my tuner and he said that he saw a spike of 8* of KR right away and overall REDUCED my Timing Advance and payed more attention to something he called throttle enrichment? I was thinking for sure I would be able to run a little more boost(3.4) and a little more Timing with the meth kit but I guess my car cannot handle the 3.4 just yet. I am running a 41 Methonal 59 Distilled Water mix for my spray.

    My question is what would cause such a high spike of KR? On my 3.5 The most I saw at WOT was 3.5 right on the downshift but the car performed just fine so I considered it as phantom knock.
    What should I try/check to try to solve this KR issue thats causing my tune to be worthless?

    Here is a video of me versus an Evo 9. He is stock in this video. This is with my 3.5
    Evo 9 GSR vs Grand Prix GTP - YouTube

    And now all the evo has done to is so far are drop in air filter and underhood shifter bushings.
    Now with my 3.4 + METH.

    Heres from 35 MPH. 20130429_202204_zpsf5648e5e.mp4 Video by fri3dchick3n | Photobucket

    Here is from 25 MPH. 20130429_201721_zps91d858cf.mp4 Video by fri3dchick3n | Photobucket












    Yes he walked me.
    99 GTP: 3.4'' MPS, Overkill PCM, Intake, Catless SD Headers, TransGo Shift Kit, 180º Thermostat, Flipped Dog Bones
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Johnstown, NY
    Posts
    323
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    From what I've read, it's better to run 18* of timing and a larger pulley than to run with a lot lower timing advance on a smaller pulley. The advance gives more power. And it's probably about 0.5psi difference between the two. I would run the 3.5.
    98 Red Coupe Grand Prix GTP : 180* T-stat, U-Bend delete, NGK TR55's, SLP Catback
    My Ride: http://www.grandprixforums.net/jevik...upe-73301.html
    A must read for modding: http://www.grandprixforums.net/safel...0-a-67580.html
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    GT Level Member fri3dchick3n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    430
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Yea, I am running about 9* at WOT according to my Aeroforce. Which is nothing. Ive talked to my tuner and are going to retune the car with the 3.5 back on there and I am also going to replace my engine mount since it is shot to help reduce those KR numbers, false or not. It still needs to be replaced.
    99 GTP: 3.4'' MPS, Overkill PCM, Intake, Catless SD Headers, TransGo Shift Kit, 180º Thermostat, Flipped Dog Bones
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    I live here. SlowNA06's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    5,928
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    9*? Isn't stock advance something like 16*?
    Irridium spark plugs last 100k mi and work just as well as copper. Copper is a waste on N/A and only lasts 15k mi. Don't use Platinum.
    Use 195* tstat unless you can thoroughly explain why not; 99.9% don't need a lower temp.
    Almost any oil filter, ever, is of higher quality than ACDelco. Spend $6+.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SlowNA06 View Post
    9*? Isn't stock advance something like 16*?
    yes.


    my bet is that your tune is bogus. you should easily be able to run the 3.4 with the meth if you can run the 3.5....they are basically the same pulley.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    GXP Level Member coolone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    2,374
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Almost exactly the same, yes... And agree, tune is an issue.

    You had 3.5* of knock with the meth?

    Plus why didn't tuner save what was on the PCM before flashing anything new? Tell him/her to put back what was there before, I'm sure it'll work just fine as before, but you'll need a new tuner!!! Lol...
    Overkill BBC Cam, YT 1.8 RR's, Rhodes Lifters, STGII Heads, GenV, Pacesetters, 3" Exh to Tips, TEP Trans. N*, ID 75# injectors/E85 coming soon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    club of used to own a gp 99prixgt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Jersey
    Posts
    4,643
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    9* wot?!? haha wut...holy egt's, that's bogus. you gotta get at least 16*, running the smallest pulley you can.

    throttle enrichment isn't really the table you should be concerned with, the proper way is to richen/lean out is using the maf table and making small changes. Throttle enrichment is almost what you would use to make a tiny, tiny adjustment, its not the proper way to dial in a car

    edit: i don't even use throttle enrichment, i leave that table alone. Also what tuner are you using? if its a dhp powertuner i can guarantee your stock tables are in there.
    Last edited by 99prixgt; 04-30-2013 at 09:04 AM.
    16' wrx sti- stock
    06 Spice Red GTO- m6/exhaust/tune/suspension/377whp-383tq-sold
    99 silvermist gp gt-g5/xp/IC/3.0mps-parted&sold
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    club of used to own a gp 99prixgt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Jersey
    Posts
    4,643
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    do you have a wideband? Its almost guessing work doing it without it. Don't let him max out your injectors too
    16' wrx sti- stock
    06 Spice Red GTO- m6/exhaust/tune/suspension/377whp-383tq-sold
    99 silvermist gp gt-g5/xp/IC/3.0mps-parted&sold
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    GXP Level Member darkhorizon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    flintnasty MI
    Posts
    2,596
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    you can get KR from too much fuel, and water injection....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    GT Level Member fri3dchick3n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    430
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    He said he leaned it out to 11.9. And yes I had 3.5* of KR with meth on a 3.5 untuned for it. On the down shifts though for about a second and it would disappear quickly.

    He's using a brand new HP TUNER, and has owned a highly modified GTP previously. So thats why I chose him to tuned : /

    Oh and no wideband.

    And I have an extra PCM chillin at home if it would better.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    I live here. SlowNA06's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    5,928
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by fri3dchick3n View Post
    He said he leaned it out to 11.9.

    no wideband.
    Irridium spark plugs last 100k mi and work just as well as copper. Copper is a waste on N/A and only lasts 15k mi. Don't use Platinum.
    Use 195* tstat unless you can thoroughly explain why not; 99.9% don't need a lower temp.
    Almost any oil filter, ever, is of higher quality than ACDelco. Spend $6+.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    Moderator dsmuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Coldwater, OH
    Posts
    15,758
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    With no wb you don't know what your afr is so you have no way of telling what he leaned it out to.
    98 GTP modded 1.9's, sd headers, 3.4", zzp 1.0 230K miles scrapped.
    04 Comp G zzp stb's, UMI ta's, Speedbuilt sways, bully flo heads, XP, zzp headers, fsic, thrasher shift kit, 60#, 2.6" corsa 2.5", Inferno hood
    01 gt z7 turbo tep trans zzp motor
    08 g8 gt cam exhaust 11.87@118
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    Turbo is the way to go. BillBoost37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    W Spfld
    Posts
    26,815
    Thanks (Received)
    53
    Likes (Received)
    90
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    How much torque management is still active in the tune? Most often a small spike of KR at a downshift is torque management. GM has TM inducing KR as a method of reducing timing/power during the shift.

    There's no such thing as phantom or false KR. KR is either a mechanical, electrical or tuning issue that should be fixed.
    I drink..so consider that when reading my posts.

    2010 Audi A6 Dual IC's
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    GT Level Member fri3dchick3n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    430
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I'm sure that the torque management has not been touched. Should it be disabled completely?

    I guess I was feeling brave trying to get a meth tune with no WB aye.

    Time to look into that if I want a good tune. Hopefully won't run me too much
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    Moderator DanPrixGTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Grand Rapids, Michigan
    Posts
    5,488
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by fri3dchick3n View Post
    I'm sure that the torque management has not been touched. Should it be disabled completely?

    I guess I was feeling brave trying to get a meth tune with no WB aye.

    Time to look into that if I want a good tune. Hopefully won't run me too much
    My tune has no TM at all, I don't think.

    An AEM Wideband on Ebay costs like $160. Not to bad.
    '97 GTP - Stage 2 Heads, 90# Springs, 1.9 Harland Sharp Rockers, Gen V, 3.0, Intake, N* TB, LQ4, FSIC, 10.5mm Wires, Poly Mounts, SLP Headers, Borla Exaust, Built Trans - SOLD*

    '08 G8 GT - 6.7L 408CI Stroker, 239/254 Cam, Fast Intake, 102mm TB, CAI, Full Exhaust.





    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    GXP Level Member darkhorizon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    flintnasty MI
    Posts
    2,596
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BillBoost37 View Post
    How much torque management is still active in the tune? Most often a small spike of KR at a downshift is torque management. GM has TM inducing KR as a method of reducing timing/power during the shift.

    There's no such thing as phantom or false KR. KR is either a mechanical, electrical or tuning issue that should be fixed.
    torque management never shows as KR. Its a fact.

    Water/meth injection will reduce power in every case unless you add tons of timing or boost.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    GXP Level Member coolone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    2,374
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by fri3dchick3n View Post
    I'm sure that the torque management has not been touched. Should it be disabled completely?

    I guess I was feeling brave trying to get a meth tune with no WB aye.

    Time to look into that if I want a good tune. Hopefully won't run me too much
    Cheap/Fast/Reliable

    You can only have two at any one time... Chose wisely! Lol
    Seems you're already trying to skip certain steps, good luck!
    : )
    Overkill BBC Cam, YT 1.8 RR's, Rhodes Lifters, STGII Heads, GenV, Pacesetters, 3" Exh to Tips, TEP Trans. N*, ID 75# injectors/E85 coming soon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    GT Level Member fri3dchick3n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    430
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Not trying to skip steps. Just didn't know I absolutely needed it for a tune. Now I know and an AEM Wideband is on the way.
    99 GTP: 3.4'' MPS, Overkill PCM, Intake, Catless SD Headers, TransGo Shift Kit, 180º Thermostat, Flipped Dog Bones
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    club of used to own a gp 99prixgt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Jersey
    Posts
    4,643
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    a wideband gives away all secrets
    16' wrx sti- stock
    06 Spice Red GTO- m6/exhaust/tune/suspension/377whp-383tq-sold
    99 silvermist gp gt-g5/xp/IC/3.0mps-parted&sold
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20 Re: 3.5 to 3.4 = NOT GOOD 
    GXP Level Member darkhorizon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    flintnasty MI
    Posts
    2,596
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    when doing overly complicated things with fueling, a wideband is the only way to go. Other than that, you can run no wideband on a non meth injected setup pretty easy.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Key Stuck, Car Dead, and...Battery Good, Alternater good
    By izzy in forum Introductions/Noob Questions
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-14-2014, 11:13 PM
  2. HID's worth it? Hi/low/fog necessary? Good brands, with good prices?
    By chamilton89 in forum Audio, Security & Visual Electronics
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: 08-06-2012, 09:10 PM
  3. Is it still any good?
    By SDGTP99 in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-02-2011, 11:01 PM
  4. Would this look good, really good, okish, bad, or really bad?
    By Jakescoots in forum Visual/Body Modifications
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-02-2011, 06:21 PM
  5. Good bye :(
    By 98GPGT in forum Off Topic Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-21-2008, 01:44 AM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •