Thread: To build bottom end, or not to build bottom end?

Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. #1 To build bottom end, or not to build bottom end? 
    SE Level Member Stephen Shaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    35
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    So I had these big plans to rebuild my motor, but due to recent events I'm now broke and i'm looking to get my GP on the road as cheap as possible, and as soon as possible.

    So the engine itself has 220,000 KMs (136,701 Miles), I was going to put all new bearings and piston rings in, but keep the orginal pistons and connecting rods.

    Parts that I already purchased, and that I plan on putting in:
    XP Cam/Valve springs/modified retainers/valve seals
    timing chain/dampener
    ARP Head studs

    My thoughts are, if a spin a bearing, i'll take the engine out and find one with lowers KMs to put my cam and stuff in. If a pistion or connecting rod goes, it would have went anyways because they would still be the orginal ones.

    I still have to pay $500 to have the car tuned too.

    What are your thoughts? Are these bottom ends good for high miles?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Turbo is the way to go. REDCRAPGP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Behind you...sike made you look Bish
    Posts
    16,085
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Usually our bottom ends never take a dump until they've been messed with or attempted to be swapped. You should be fine.
    Squirrels are my engine. I need a Ford Regal
    04 Comp G.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: To build bottom end, or not to build bottom end? 
    GTX Level Member QUICKSILVER462's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    HUDSON
    Posts
    1,132
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Received)
    8
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    If you have the knowledge, patience, and tools to check clearences and dimensions, then by all means re-build the bottom end, if not, find a REPUTABLE machine shop that is up to the task. If that is not a viable option than find a good-used factory short/long block and go from that as a starting point for an engine build.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    GT Level Member Sushamouf's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    349
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    ^ This

    The bottom end is not "magical or cursed" on the 3800, the only reason they would fail after a rebuild is ignorance. It's just like every other engine... if you don't know what you are doing, have someone who does do the work. I say have a GOOD machine shop work the block. If you are doing head studs, have them do a torque plate hone.

    Sent from my Droid
    2000 GTP - Stage 3 Heads - Gen V - 48# Injectors - Hardened Pushrods - Comp Limited Travel Lifters - LS6 Springs - Yella Terra 1.9 Rockers - S3 Phenolic Intercooler - N* TB - SD Headers - SR intake - ZZP 3.1 Pulley - Dyno Tune - Built 4T65E-HD - 12" Brake kit - SS brake lines - KYB GR2 Struts - 333WHP - 386WTQ
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Who's charging 500 for a tune?

    Where are you located?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: To build bottom end, or not to build bottom end? 
    GTX Level Member GOTIT4CHEAP16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Bowie, MD
    Posts
    613
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Im paying $500 to get my car dyno tuned also in va.
    Gen V, 3.0, Stage 2 heads, XP Cam, SD Headers, N*, LQ4, ZZP Stage 2 Gen 3 Intercooler, CAI, AL 104's Gapped to .055, #130 Springs, 42.5lb Injectors, ZZP Tune.

    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: To build bottom end, or not to build bottom end? 
    SE Level Member Stephen Shaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    35
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Raven Autosports (James) is doing it. You guys probably know his car, the Cavalier with the turbo 3800. I'm located in Nova Scotia, Canada.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: To build bottom end, or not to build bottom end? 
    GXP Level Member darkhorizon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    flintnasty MI
    Posts
    2,596
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    you shouldnt really ever need to tune a 3800 car beyond just flashing some garbage on it that makes it run right..... 500 for a tune is easily the worst way to spend money on your car.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    GTX Level Member GOTIT4CHEAP16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Bowie, MD
    Posts
    613
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Dyno tune is the best way to get a good running cammed built car(380")

    Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
    Gen V, 3.0, Stage 2 heads, XP Cam, SD Headers, N*, LQ4, ZZP Stage 2 Gen 3 Intercooler, CAI, AL 104's Gapped to .055, #130 Springs, 42.5lb Injectors, ZZP Tune.

    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: To build bottom end, or not to build bottom end? 
    GTP Level Member OrangeL67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    634
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quicksilver is right. End of the day, the 3800 was built by someone on an assembly line. GM follows strict guidlines regarding torque specs & oiclearences. Thee 3800 is a very reliable engine because of this. And it shouldn't be a surprise that they are not reliable when these details are overlooked. Also, the variation of rod weight can be extremely wide. I found out that 1 of my l32 rods weighed 14.9 grams more than another (from the same engine). 14 grams of unbalanced weight at 6000 rpm is at least 600 pounds of crank flexing force from that 1 rod alone. This explains why some 3800's are fine being revved to 7k rpm, and some break at 6300. It is important to balance any 3800 that will be used with a big cam at high rpm. GM obviously didn't pay close attention to the balance, probably because they used pretty beefy parts in thier supercharged applications and they were intended to handle boost, but not necessarily high rpm's.

    Tricky little bastards I tell you.

    VS cam build 13.01@107 316whp/ XP build #1 12.78@110 334whp/ XP build #2 12.56@113 347whp
    IS3 Cam build (Ready to put out some serious numbers)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11  
    I live here. MoarkatsINmuhtrailer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    5,150
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by GOTIT4CHEAP16 View Post
    Dyno tune is the best way to get a good running cammed built car(380")

    Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
    Lol... Well... Not really... But ok
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: To build bottom end, or not to build bottom end? 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    And no, dyno tunes are for goobers.

    Street tuning or nothing. All a dyno is good for is for maximizing gains on a setup with AWESOMECOOLNUMBERSSS.

    You don't go WOT everywhere, so tune your car on the street like it should be. In all sorts of situations. In every gear, at multitudes of different speeds.

    Quote Originally Posted by darkhorizon View Post
    you shouldnt really ever need to tune a 3800 car beyond just flashing some garbage on it that makes it run right..... 500 for a tune is easily the worst way to spend money on your car.
    You never cease to amaze me.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: To build bottom end, or not to build bottom end? 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    well what do you REALLY do here?

    Bump the maf around a little, bump the timing around a little, change the shift points and line pressure.

    Not exactly $500 worth of work.

    Tunes don't really do much with a 3800.

    Its not like you can add 10* of timing and pickup power, or lean it out a point or two and pickup power, or increase boost targets and pickup power.

    Its just not in the cards.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14  
    GTX Level Member crbquist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    689
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by matt5112 View Post
    well what do you REALLY do here?

    Bump the maf around a little, bump the timing around a little, change the shift points and line pressure.

    Not exactly $500 worth of work.

    Tunes don't really do much with a 3800.

    Its not like you can add 10* of timing and pickup power, or lean it out a point or two and pickup power, or increase boost targets and pickup power.

    Its just not in the cards.
    I picked up power from having all those parameters adjusted.
    01 Silvermist GTP - E85 - Cam - Heads - Phenolic IC - Polished Gen V - Stock trans...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: To build bottom end, or not to build bottom end? 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    How much were these parameters adjust by? What sort of tune did you have beforehand?

    Just looking at your mod list, you'd need a tune because you've stuck injectors in there with no known calibration (which are also of an ancient design, worse than the factory injectors), and a larger TB which some claim to have tuning issues with. Larger MAF also requires adjustments.

    So I wouldn't doubt it was running pig rich or way too lean.

    Tuning isn't magical. Get fuel and spark in order and you're done.

    Feel like I'm repeating myself.
    Last edited by matt5112; 12-11-2012 at 06:59 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16  
    GTX Level Member crbquist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    689
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    The maf and injectors were dialed in upon completion of my cam install. Then my car was running pig rich with an afr in the mid 10's, so a full point was taken away along with bumping the timing a few degrees and the car suddenly felt like it picked up a good amount of power. I'm doing heads and an IC this winter, so I am assuming I will be in need of a better tune come then.
    01 Silvermist GTP - E85 - Cam - Heads - Phenolic IC - Polished Gen V - Stock trans...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: To build bottom end, or not to build bottom end? 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    What you described is pretty basic tuning, nothing special.

    If your tune was done correctly the first time, the intercooler shouldn't change anything.

    Perhaps you'll need fuel a little sooner with the smaller pulley though.

    But that doesn't constitute the phrase "better", just more accurate for your modifications.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: To build bottom end, or not to build bottom end? 
    GTP Level Member OrangeL67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    634
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Dear thread. You've been JACKED!!!

    VS cam build 13.01@107 316whp/ XP build #1 12.78@110 334whp/ XP build #2 12.56@113 347whp
    IS3 Cam build (Ready to put out some serious numbers)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19 Re: To build bottom end, or not to build bottom end? 
    GXP Level Member GTPpower's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Schuyler, NE
    Posts
    2,973
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Received)
    23
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    So, wait...why are you rebuilding your motor? The way I'm understanding this thread, it's running fine. Correct?


    2001 GTP Drag Car - XPZ, Tischler heads, Upsidedown M90 IC'd, e85, Gen V, 2.3 w/ 5%OD
    2005 F350 6.0 - studded, deleted, tuned
    2001 GTP - cam, headers, nitrous, stock trans - 11.83 @ 116 <$2k in mods - sold
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20  
    Turbo is the way to go. REDCRAPGP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Behind you...sike made you look Bish
    Posts
    16,085
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I'm guessing its because it wants to put his XP cam in it so he wants to rebuild it first? Really not sure.
    Squirrels are my engine. I need a Ford Regal
    04 Comp G.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. Too Slow, Time for a build (GEN V/N*/L32 Lim build)
    By AmericanSoldier in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 124
    Last Post: 01-13-2012, 01:54 PM
  2. bottom swap, or how i learned to rebuild the bottom end completely
    By almighty in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-18-2009, 03:37 AM
  3. bottom end
    By rodman in forum 3.8L V6 Naturally Aspirated (L36)(L26)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-27-2008, 11:01 AM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •