Okay well I know first off the L67 can handle boost better due to the stronger internals and lower compression ratio, but at the same time the L36 has a higher compression ratio which if tuned properly / ran correct octane gas, and could avoid detonation you would be able to create more horsepower with a higher compression ratio with forced induction because the piston is up higher compressing the air even more that's already extremely pressurized/condensed.
However anyways besides the L67 having stronger internals, lets say you put the SAME EXACT turbo kit, run the same psi & same tuning software on #1. Supercharged L67 (which makes it twin charged then) OR #2. L36. Is naturally aspirated, HOWEVER has a higher compression ratio (which if detonation can be avoided will create quite a bit more horsepower), also has NO parasitic loss from driving the supercharger, has a lower final drive ratio then the L67 final drive ratios (so acceleration is improved),
So what will create more horsepower, and not only that since the final drive ratios which would probably be faster accelerating w/ identical turbo setup; and what will be the difference in horsepower & torque curves/peaks (low/mid/high range power for each motor by guesstimating) reason i'm asking this is I heard twin charging you get great down low from the Eaton M90 Charger power/torque while your turbo starts to spool completely. Also would putting on a smaller s/c pulley increase power, and would you benefit a lot from some kind of inter-cooler setup with the twin-charged setup?
Thanks Guys (also this is my first post & happy to join your forum BTW!)
~Andy
