
Originally Posted by
MitchieGTP
i still dont see how this can be argued. Maybe if you had dyno numbers from an 11 second car proving that a bigger cat back did nothing for it, but I can guarantee there is some power being lost in a 2.25" catback on a 3.8L with a blower (let alone an 11 second one). No doubt it made great numbers...but could it have made better numbers with a bigger mandrel bent exhaust?? I know that a lot of power is lost at the manifold and downpipe....thats why when i put a pulley on my gtp i used a powerlog and 3" r/t downpipe...but I'm definitely regretting not putting on a catback.
realdiehl...as far as your "LOLWUT?" comment..im not too sure what ur asking. And the guys at the track that I talked to that said they had good gains from their cat backs were w-body guys (either regal gs or gtp).