Thread: Fooling rear O2

Results 1 to 20 of 20

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1 Fooling rear O2 
    SE Level Member oldschoolpontiacs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    BC Canada
    Posts
    35
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    So my sis popped the motor in her '97 GTP, and we're in the middle of swapping in a good motor. I decided to just yank the whole exhaust out from under the car so I can inspect it for leaks, got to love FWD for having the exhaust run under everything so it's easy to pull. Anyway, I notice it's got a goofy U-bend deal for the rear O2 sensor, and behind that a glasspack looking thing that I assume acts as a resonator. I figure there's probably 4 or 5 hp sitting in there, so I want to chop it out and weld a straight piece of pipe in there instead. Obviously that kind of removes the space required to fit the O2 sensor back under the floorpan, and running that wire back there is a PITA anyways, so is there a way I can eliminate the rear O2? I've heard of guys putting resistors and such in to fool the computer into thinking it's reading what it wants to see, and since it still has the primary O2 upstream I can't see it causing any problems. Help?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: Fooling rear O2 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    resonator isnt a restriction. leave it alone so the car stays quiet.

    the ubend should be taken out, though.

    you can buy an o2 simulator. those just plug into the plug where the o2 sensor would go. a resistor wont work.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: Fooling rear O2 
    SE Level Member oldschoolpontiacs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    BC Canada
    Posts
    35
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Where would I find something like that and are they expensive?
    Sisters car: 1997 4-door GTP
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: Fooling rear O2 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    They are about $40-$50 from ZZP
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: Fooling rear O2 
    SE Level Member oldschoolpontiacs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    BC Canada
    Posts
    35
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Thanks, I just checked their website, $60 Canadian before shipping. Yikes. I'll pass on that, it's a lot cheaper to just drill a hole and weld a bung into a $5 piece of pipe and reinstall the sensor
    Sisters car: 1997 4-door GTP
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: Fooling rear O2 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    ^^ Yeah...that works too Just be sure to get rid of that U-Bend though...horrible piece of GM engineering...plus it'll give ya a little bit better gas mileage too IMO.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: Fooling rear O2 
    Donating Users gtpsleeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Lawrence, Kansas, United States
    Posts
    1,351
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bluegtp91 View Post
    ^^ Yeah...that works too Just be sure to get rid of that U-Bend though...horrible piece of GM engineering...plus it'll give ya a little bit better gas mileage too IMO.
    X2...huge difference
    "My car is a racecar like Planet Fitness is a gym...."

    proud mark VIII victim!!! suck it...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: Fooling rear O2 
    SE Level Member oldschoolpontiacs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    BC Canada
    Posts
    35
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Cool thanks, now that I think of it I probably have some leftover exhaust pipe that I could use for that lying around, so if I just cut out the existing bung and reuse it this mod will cost me a whopping few cents in welding wire haha. Between that and having a motor with half the mileage of the one that kicked the bucket, I really hope my sis notices an improvement in power and economy
    Sisters car: 1997 4-door GTP
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: Fooling rear O2 
    GrandPrix Junkie Sabrewings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Barksdale AFB, LA
    Posts
    4,879
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Just getting rid of the u-bend doesn't do a whole lot. The front manifold and the down pipe are still horrible restrictions.
    2004 Impala LS - got some mods sold!!!
    2009 Subaru Impreza WRX STI

    NAIOA moderator Still Imp'n, just in a different Imp.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: Fooling rear O2 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Sabrewings View Post
    Just getting rid of the u-bend doesn't do a whole lot. The front manifold and the down pipe are still horrible restrictions.
    Better than having it.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: Fooling rear O2 
    GrandPrix Junkie Sabrewings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Barksdale AFB, LA
    Posts
    4,879
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bluegtp91 View Post
    Better than having it.
    True. Just saying to not expect a seat of the pants difference.
    2004 Impala LS - got some mods sold!!!
    2009 Subaru Impreza WRX STI

    NAIOA moderator Still Imp'n, just in a different Imp.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: Fooling rear O2 
    Donating Users gtpsleeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Lawrence, Kansas, United States
    Posts
    1,351
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Sabrewings View Post
    True. Just saying to not expect a seat of the pants difference.
    O for sure to be honest I didn notice really any power change when I swapped it, it was mainly the MPG....I went up 1.5 MPG
    "My car is a racecar like Planet Fitness is a gym...."

    proud mark VIII victim!!! suck it...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: Fooling rear O2 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by gtpsleeper View Post
    O for sure to be honest I didn notice really any power change when I swapped it, it was mainly the MPG....I went up 1.5 MPG
    I LOST mpg's. I installed my custom CAI when I did the U-Bend too...soooo...all those WOT runs
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: Fooling rear O2 
    GTX Level Member stlmo_gtp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    1,043
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by oldschoolpontiacs View Post
    I've heard of guys putting resistors and such in to fool the computer into thinking it's reading what it wants to see, and since it still has the primary O2 upstream I can't see it causing any problems. Help?
    i can tell you from personal experience, that this trick does not work to well i have changed the resistor about 4 times already they just keep blowing, so now i just drive with the SES light on until i get you o2 eliminator
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: Fooling rear O2 
    SE Level Member oldschoolpontiacs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    BC Canada
    Posts
    35
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Dammit! The O2 sensor had been cross threaded (was a huge PITA to remove) but I decided to try and fix up the threads and reuse it to save some $$$. I got the pipe all built up, O2 bung reused from the old pipe welded in the right place, threaded the new O2 in for a test fit under the car and after it wouldn't come back out. Threaded in nicely...but wouldn't come out...long story short, neither the sensor nor the bung have threads anymore. A new sensor is about $90, so she's going with the ZZP emulator. F$%K!!!!
    Sisters car: 1997 4-door GTP
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: Fooling rear O2 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by oldschoolpontiacs View Post
    Dammit! The O2 sensor had been cross threaded (was a huge PITA to remove) but I decided to try and fix up the threads and reuse it to save some $$$. I got the pipe all built up, O2 bung reused from the old pipe welded in the right place, threaded the new O2 in for a test fit under the car and after it wouldn't come back out. Threaded in nicely...but wouldn't come out...long story short, neither the sensor nor the bung have threads anymore. A new sensor is about $90, so she's going with the ZZP emulator. F$%K!!!!
    Just wondering where in the hell you buy sensors FROM?!?! ZZP sells them for about 40-50 bucks.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: Fooling rear O2 
    SE Level Member oldschoolpontiacs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    BC Canada
    Posts
    35
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Canada...we get raped on everything. ZZP sells the emulator for $50 too, but that's $60+ in our money, and then another $30-40 by the time it hits our door. Same for the O2. Folks in the US don't realize how dry we take it up here, even when our dollars were the same we were still paying more for everything just because companies get away with doing so. It's really irritating.
    Sisters car: 1997 4-door GTP
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: Fooling rear O2 
    GTP Level Member 2000GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Long Island, New York
    Posts
    1,706
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by oldschoolpontiacs View Post
    Canada...we get raped on everything. ZZP sells the emulator for $50 too, but that's $60+ in our money, and then another $30-40 by the time it hits our door. Same for the O2. Folks in the US don't realize how dry we take it up here, even when our dollars were the same we were still paying more for everything just because companies get away with doing so. It's really irritating.
    yea that really sucks for you canadians. hard to get parts
    2000 GP GTP Black 2 Door AEM Meth Injection (100% Meth), 3.25" pulley, N* TB, PRJ Wires, Smoothflow Idlers, 42# injectors, Racetronix fuel pump, ZZP Headers, 1.8 Roller Rockers, Custom CAI, NGK TR6 Plugs, 180* Tstat, Custom Tuning by TUNE TIME PERFORMANCE
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. rear o2
    By gotboost3 in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-21-2009, 02:54 PM
  2. Rear STB only...
    By a3gtp in forum Brakes/Suspension/Chassis
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-08-2009, 06:17 PM
  3. Rear O2
    By probuilder1 in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-27-2008, 10:12 PM
  4. Front or Rear?
    By J_Man55 in forum Brakes/Suspension/Chassis
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-13-2008, 01:26 PM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •