Thread: SSIC vs S2IC ZZP recommendations

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 45
  1. #1 SSIC vs S2IC ZZP recommendations 
    SE Level Member kewGTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Appleton, WI
    Posts
    106
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Getting ready to pull the trigger for a IC, my question is for those with experience with either one of these products. The main thing that's holding me back from the S2 ic is knowing that a trans upgrade will have to be right around the corner. For those with the SSIC do you regret not going for the full size ?

    Just a quick note , E85 is not a viable option for me at this time , hence going the IC route.
    '05 GTP - E85 - XP Cam - 3.0 Pulley - Supporting Mods...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: SSIC vs S2IC ZZP recommendations 
    Killa Bee Scottydoggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    39,927
    Thanks (Received)
    63
    Likes (Received)
    166
    Dislikes (Received)
    5
    when i was looking i was going to settle for a ssic, every one said not to get one and just go fsic. i waited long enough and one came up finally.

    just paid for it last night lol

    98 Buick Regal GS, F body brakes, Caddy STS wheels, tinted tails L36 bottom end, lightly ported heads, 1.95 roller rockers, headers, gen 5 N* 3.0 pulley, FSIC, 42 lb injectors, a BrandonHall rebuilt trans, DHP tuned and AEM water/Meth injection https://goo.gl/gpV5kW
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: SSIC vs S2IC ZZP recommendations 
    SE Level Member kewGTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Appleton, WI
    Posts
    106
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Lucky! I would like to be high 12s eventually so that's pushing me towards the S2IC as well. I don't think the SSIC would be able to get me there by itself. . .
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: SSIC vs S2IC ZZP recommendations 
    Turbo is the way to go. REDCRAPGP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Behind you...sike made you look Bish
    Posts
    16,085
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    FSIC > SSIC

    I wouldn't waste money on a SSIC, it won't cool the blower to much.. Going the FSIC route gives you way more headroom to drop pulleys.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Squirrels are my engine. I need a Ford Regal
    04 Comp G.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: SSIC vs S2IC ZZP recommendations 
    SE Level Member kewGTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Appleton, WI
    Posts
    106
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Anybody have first hand knowledge of how difficult the install is?
    '05 GTP - E85 - XP Cam - 3.0 Pulley - Supporting Mods...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: SSIC vs S2IC ZZP recommendations 
    Turbo is the way to go. REDCRAPGP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Behind you...sike made you look Bish
    Posts
    16,085
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    There nothing real to it, it's rather easy. A bit time consuming because you'll be removing the bumper to mount the FMHE and pump and hoses etc


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Squirrels are my engine. I need a Ford Regal
    04 Comp G.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: SSIC vs S2IC ZZP recommendations 
    Killa Bee Scottydoggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    39,927
    Thanks (Received)
    63
    Likes (Received)
    166
    Dislikes (Received)
    5
    you take the blower off and install the ic core under it. you need a modded fuel rail or fuel logs.

    98 Buick Regal GS, F body brakes, Caddy STS wheels, tinted tails L36 bottom end, lightly ported heads, 1.95 roller rockers, headers, gen 5 N* 3.0 pulley, FSIC, 42 lb injectors, a BrandonHall rebuilt trans, DHP tuned and AEM water/Meth injection https://goo.gl/gpV5kW
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: SSIC vs S2IC ZZP recommendations 
    SE Level Member USonuMabeaCh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    gulf breeze, fl
    Posts
    103
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I'm so glad someone came infront of me and asked this...

    Since I've been bullied so much, lol jk, I'm going to go ahead and grab an IC to work with the rest of the mods I have planned... (SD headers, CAI, 1.9s, pcm),

    I decided, similarly to kew, that I want to go as close to the line as I can without having to beef up the trans or mess with the injectors/MAF/TB

    it looks like a 3.2 is the smallest I can go before I have to mess with that stuff... and I'll be taking my car to get fully tuned after everything is installed, but I still have an overkill PCM set for the aforementioned mods before the tune...

    I'm worrying about clearance issues with a full size and my 40th ann hood, so I'm actually back to considering the SSIC... would it be enough for a 3.2 with headers, 1.9s, and a tune, or would i still likely have to fight KR after heatsoak?

    If I can get away with the SSIC and not have to worry about cradle spacers and messing with the geometry of the transaxle, I'd prefer that... and it looks like no-one is running the 40th-style hood with an intercooler so...

    I'm waiting for black friday to decide specifically which brand IC i get if it's a full size, though I'm eyeing sseilmnop's IC above all, as it is the shortest next to the SSIC, I just wish I could know 100% what fits under this friggin hood
    02 40th GTP 2dr SSEI IC ZZP system with 3.2" Wizaird CAI Transgo SK SD headers aeroforce w/WB 1.9s over kill tune | 70 Skylark 455 bored to 462 Stg 1 iron heads ported 270 in 205 ex spx intake 870 street avenger 2" headers 3" xpipe flowmaster 40's full msd ign custom cam 540 hp 560 lbft TH400 2800 stall hotchkis susp DTS 12 bolt 3.42 rear
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: SSIC vs S2IC ZZP recommendations 
    GrandPrix Junkie SgtMarshal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kemmerer, Wyoming
    Posts
    4,704
    Thanks (Received)
    10
    Likes (Received)
    25
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    You won't need cradle spacers, you might have to take the drop tray off your scooped hood, but should be fine
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: SSIC vs S2IC ZZP recommendations 
    Turbo is the way to go. REDCRAPGP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Behind you...sike made you look Bish
    Posts
    16,085
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Cradle spacers if needed


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Squirrels are my engine. I need a Ford Regal
    04 Comp G.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: SSIC vs S2IC ZZP recommendations 
    SE Level Member USonuMabeaCh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    gulf breeze, fl
    Posts
    103
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SgtMarshal View Post
    You won't need cradle spacers, you might have to take the drop tray off your scooped hood, but should be fine
    for the full sized phenolic?
    02 40th GTP 2dr SSEI IC ZZP system with 3.2" Wizaird CAI Transgo SK SD headers aeroforce w/WB 1.9s over kill tune | 70 Skylark 455 bored to 462 Stg 1 iron heads ported 270 in 205 ex spx intake 870 street avenger 2" headers 3" xpipe flowmaster 40's full msd ign custom cam 540 hp 560 lbft TH400 2800 stall hotchkis susp DTS 12 bolt 3.42 rear
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: SSIC vs S2IC ZZP recommendations 
    GXP Level Member GTPpower's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Schuyler, NE
    Posts
    2,972
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Received)
    23
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Don't get an ssic. They aren't big enough to be consistent.


    2001 GTP Drag Car - XPZ, Tischler heads, Upsidedown M90 IC'd, e85, Gen V, 2.3 w/ 5%OD
    2005 F350 6.0 - studded, deleted, tuned
    2001 GTP - cam, headers, nitrous, stock trans - 11.83 @ 116 <$2k in mods - sold
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: SSIC vs S2IC ZZP recommendations 
    LaBarge Supercharged sseilmnop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Mercer, Pa
    Posts
    1,766
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    9
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    New full size phenolic and stage 2 intercoolers are 2-1/4"
    Adapters, Phenolic Intercoolers, Supercharger Parts & TVS2300
    http://stores.ebay.com/QualitySuperchargers
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: SSIC vs S2IC ZZP recommendations 
    GrandPrix Junkie SgtMarshal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kemmerer, Wyoming
    Posts
    4,704
    Thanks (Received)
    10
    Likes (Received)
    25
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    cradle spacers are used for the 04+ cars. I have a 2001 special edition and had the phenolic intercooler. I also had lowering springs with engine and trans mount spacers to raise the engine and trans back up. I did end up cutting a hole in the hood and putting a scoop over it because the supercharger was too tall, but ive heard of other people that didn't have that problem.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: SSIC vs S2IC ZZP recommendations 
    GT Level Member mguzzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Buffalo NY
    Posts
    483
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Received)
    27
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I wouldn't say the SSIC is totally useless. The heat capacity all depends on how much coolant reservoir you install with it. The kit "as is" really doesn't have enough capacity to stay cool for more than a nice 1/4 mile pass. When I installed the SSIC in my sedan way back when, I added a larger VW Scirocco radiator as the FMHE and also added a reservoir, so I had about a gallon and a half of capacity. It was enough to knock down 3 to 4 degrees of KR on a 3.4 / PLOG / DP / 1.8 rocker setup and never got heat soaked at the track. It fit under a stock hood, kept functional PCV, and only needed a small mod to the stock fuel rails with a couple inches of rubber fuel hose to extend over the top of the blower.
    --
    "Silver Bullet" 98 GTP Coupe: Stock, rust free, and broadsided.
    Old '98 GTP Coupe: VS Cam, 3.0, S2IC, 42.5#, TOGs, N*/LQ4, Corsa. it once ran a 13 flat
    Older '98 GTP Sedan: Pullied, rockered, SSIC, etc. Stock 14.33 @ 96.5 / PB: 13.89 @ 101
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: SSIC vs S2IC ZZP recommendations 
    GXP Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Tomball
    Posts
    2,633
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by sseilmnop View Post
    New full size phenolic and stage 2 intercoolers are 2-1/4"
    So how thick are your cores?

    Jeff
    An engine is an engine no matter the size.... I think Dr. Seuss said that... or maybe it was Big Weld....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: SSIC vs S2IC ZZP recommendations 
    LaBarge Supercharged sseilmnop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Mercer, Pa
    Posts
    1,766
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    9
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by J57ltr View Post
    So how thick are your cores?

    Jeff
    I am the full size phenolic maker.
    They are 2-1/4" thick with functional PCV.

    Anybody saying ssic's aren't bad has never run both. Ssic's are 30% of a full size at best.
    Adapters, Phenolic Intercoolers, Supercharger Parts & TVS2300
    http://stores.ebay.com/QualitySuperchargers
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: SSIC vs S2IC ZZP recommendations 
    GXP Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Tomball
    Posts
    2,633
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    The actual core you are using is 2 -1/4" thick, the actual heat exchanger? So basically you have no plenum area under (besides the LIM) or above the core? Not criticizing just asking.

    Jeff
    An engine is an engine no matter the size.... I think Dr. Seuss said that... or maybe it was Big Weld....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19 Re: SSIC vs S2IC ZZP recommendations 
    LaBarge Supercharged sseilmnop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Mercer, Pa
    Posts
    1,766
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    9
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    The thickness of the Finns is about 1-7/8" thick.

    The intercoolers are 2-1/4" thick. They can't be any thinner.
    Adapters, Phenolic Intercoolers, Supercharger Parts & TVS2300
    http://stores.ebay.com/QualitySuperchargers
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20 Re: SSIC vs S2IC ZZP recommendations 
    GXP Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Tomball
    Posts
    2,633
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    OK, thanks for the information the one I am working on it 3" thick with a 2" core so I was a little confused.

    Appreciate the info.


    I would agree the core thickness is key.

    Jeff
    An engine is an engine no matter the size.... I think Dr. Seuss said that... or maybe it was Big Weld....
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Top Swap and S2IC Knock KR issues
    By rell2005 in forum 3.8L V6 Naturally Aspirated (L36)(L26)
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 06-11-2012, 01:43 PM
  2. S2IC hood clearance ...Cradle spacer...WTF!?
    By rell2005 in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-11-2012, 08:40 AM
  3. S2IC Question...Cradle Spacer WTF!?
    By rell2005 in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-11-2012, 03:18 AM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •