Thread: Running higher grade fuel.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 45 of 45
  1. #41 Re: Running higher grade fuel. 
    Donating Users chrisb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Bucyrus, OH
    Posts
    404
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TDCRacing View Post
    Why would they say that you have to run 93 then?

    the only reson y i could think of would be cause they modify the torque managment tables putting more of shock/load on the motor at shift points causing more kr. when i had my intense tune i would get 7 to 8* of kr on a downshift into first on 87. and with 93 it would be like 2* or so. another reason y might because since your modding your car and running it harder then the average person, then 93 would be cheap insurance to keep it from knocking apart.
    99 Grand Prix old build- CAI, Custom exhaust, HV3, Stage 2 TB, custom tune, ported heads intense s1x cam, headers.
    Nothing great Just a small T66 Turbo with a Hv3 On a stock tranny untill i finish the other one.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #42 Re: Running higher grade fuel. 
    TDCRacing
    Guest
    Well, TM shows up as KR it's a proven fact. Reducing it or removing it all together would not give any Kr but in fact just the oposite. If you were seeing 9* or any any KR for that matter then it sounds like the torque reduction downshift tables were modified,wich should not have been touched in the first place because it does nothing at a performance stand point. Or could have been caused by many other factors. Belive it or not I have never heard of kr at downshifts...well heard of it yes...but never knew anyone that had it happen to them.


    And if these ''off the shelf tunes'' arent comming with increased timing tables to go along with the mods I'd be an unhappy camper.Or if the pcm that i got was giving me kr at an unuasual time like you were experiencing.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #43 Re: Running higher grade fuel. 
    Bastard Reptile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    3,459
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Any time the engine pulls timing for whatever reason is showed as KR. That being said, the PCM does pull timing at the shifts....and it's probably a combination of torque management AND knock. Like I've said before, you car will always perform better for the fuel it was tuned for. If you have a tune that runs excellent on 87, then running anything higher will hurt performance. Higher octane fuel needs to be compressed more to get any benefit, and raising compression on an engine makes it more efficient. 93 just helps you in the goal of running the maximum amount of cylinder pressure without damaging your engine.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #44 Re: Running higher grade fuel. 
    GXP Level Member offroadfury6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Fayetteville, NC
    Posts
    2,677
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    kinda lost me there reptile. mine runs best on 93, smoother, better highway miles...so u saying i need to run 93? manuel says on N/A is to be ran 87. All S/C models should run higher.
    2011 Honda Civic EX-L - Leather/Sunroof/LOADED!
    2009 Saturn Aura XE - I got shift paddles!!!
    '98 Olds Cutlass - Good, Dependable
    '06 GP GT S/C - Traded it in
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #45 Re: Running higher grade fuel. 
    Bastard Reptile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    3,459
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Because 93 can withstand pre-ignition with a power adder better than low octane fuel. If you have a stock pcm and a supercharger, you should run premium....period.

    Higher performance usually requires higher octane under normal circumstances.
    If you have a tuner, and you modify the pcm to run with 87, the gains are there, but it's pretty difficult to make a GTP run on 87 without popping something once you start dropping pulley sizes.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Fuel issue...possible fuel pump????HELP
    By TAWinner23 in forum 3.8L V6 Naturally Aspirated (L36)(L26)
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 08-31-2013, 11:50 PM
  2. Custom AN Fuel Line setup for PRJ Fuel Rails... [*]
    By Iron Indian in forum How To Write-Ups/Tech Tips
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 01-17-2009, 07:53 PM
  3. Anyone running an EGT sensor?
    By Andrew_99GTP in forum Turbo
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-18-2008, 07:13 AM
  4. HELP!! My GP is Only Running On 5 Cylinders!!
    By y1a3o in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 05-14-2008, 11:20 PM
  5. Fuel pressure and fuel in the rails
    By 02BlueGT in forum 3.8L V6 Naturally Aspirated (L36)(L26)
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-13-2008, 12:03 AM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •