No surprise... My old contour svt had no problem keeping up with a tbss from 80+
Sent from my HTC Glacier using Tapatalk
Printable View
No surprise... My old contour svt had no problem keeping up with a tbss from 80+
Sent from my HTC Glacier using Tapatalk
Negative, ghost rider.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackblack99
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximum Gnarnage
Yeah, because a 5.3L is SO not an LS. :th_laugh-pointup: Not to be a penis, but an LS2 in that Fugly contraption should have slapped you around mercilessly at that speed, even with ol' dude's balls trapped under the accelerator.
Quote:
Originally Posted by VerzGTP
You should tell us the whole story. Did Ford take money from the government, yes. Jackblack said ford didn't take bailout money (also commonly known as AIFP), and he is correct.
Slow if i could right now I'd like that post but sadly I cannot :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Slowpoke
lol, wut.Quote:
Originally Posted by mrlogic1234
TBSS would poop on a CSVT, modded or not.
This was from a roll... Caught up to him and got in the next lane, looked over and signaled and he bit.... I didn't pass him but he didn't pull on me untill 110 or so. I was in second around 65 mph when we went. Only mods were exhaust and intake. This was in 07 with a 99 csvt.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using Tapatalk
So, at 110 he got tired of your $h!t and left you. Gotcha.
My TBSS is a turd passed 80mph... It only traps ~100mph so a 3.4 pulley GTP would have little to no issue staying close at speed, but there is no chance he will get in front of me. I will murder most any GTP under 20mph though...
The SSR trucks are JUNK. I have driven one and it is nothing comparible to my AWD TBSS... They are heavier, and just do not preform right in terms of suspension and crap... overall mega failure on GM's side there.
No I just don't think they have alot up top where the csvt shines...Quote:
Originally Posted by 02 WS6 TA
Sent from my HTC Glacier using Tapatalk
dude are you failing to realize these things weigh 4700lbs without driver!! they're low 14 second "trucks". If i was at sea level i'd be running mid,probably low 13's with my setup. Yes most of those gains would be on the bottom end but still. . the way i see it he's got an extra 50-60 crank hp over me with an extra 1000lbs to haul around. Not too hard to figure outQuote:
http://www.grandprixforums.net/image...quote_icon.png Originally Posted by Maximum Gnarnage http://www.grandprixforums.net/image...post-right.png
Definently wasn't the 5.3L. I heard him before i saw him. pulled out from a stop light before we got on the highway and there's no mistaking the sound of an LS vs 5.3L. I would've pulled a 5.3 no problem . . even top end.
And yeah. . dude was pretty old, suprised he took the bait :)
Yeah, because a 5.3L is SO not an LS. :th_laugh-pointup: Not to be a penis, but an LS2 in that Fugly contraption should have slapped you around mercilessly at that speed, even with ol' dude's balls trapped under the accelerator
i wonder what the gear ratios are in that thing...
this thread = winning
Ford received several Billions in tax payer money from the government. And several Billions from the energy department. It's the same thing. They were bailed out by the government. It's also funny how the CEO of Ford was standing shoulder to shoulder with the CEO of GM when they were begging congress for bailout money. Because Ford knows they would have gone straight down the sh!tter right along with GM. And LOL @ having Jack Black as your source.Quote:
Originally Posted by Slowpoke
Haha mech
Quote:
Originally Posted by VerzGTP
Jackblack wasn't my source, I just quoted his statement since you in gave incorrect/incomplete information champ.
Nothing I said was incorrect or incomplete.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximum Gnarnage
Right, about GM stuff. Sure thing. LMFAO