Thread: Gt vs. Sho

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 62
  1. #1 Gt vs. Sho 
    Donating Users JESSEGOTTA GP GT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    1,142
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    One of the girls that my girlfriend works with just got a SHO, I think it's a 1997? It's got 46k miles on it and everything is in perfect shape. So I finally convinced her to take me for a ride so I could see how quick it was, and It was quicker than I thought, but nothing special.(neither is my GT) So I had to talk her into racing me, first was from a 35 roll, and her car took FOREVER to downshift, so I told her to try it from a 55 roll and see (thinking it had good top end power) WRONG, left her in the dust. Then we did it from a dig, and now I'm finally thinking "ok maybe this time it'll be a decent race" well, I gave her half a car head start, and again, flew by her. I thought they were suppost to be pretty quick? (she's got an intake and some kind of flowmaster type mufflers) The best part is after we got done I texted her and said "that's what happens when you drive a Ford" and she text me back saying " my CEL is on." And again, you'll never guess what I said back..... " thats seems to be a common problem with Fords" But I really honestly thought SHO's were suppost to be pretty quick?
    New project: 2000 Red GTP.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: Gt vs. Sho 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Mansfield, Ohio
    Posts
    745
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Sho's are ok, the first year they were made my dad and I test drove a 5speed manual. I think they all used to be manual only until mid 90's. They have 220hp yamaha engines in them. I've raced my buddies 92 5speed in my 99 lude. Lude pulled it by 3 cars to 130mph. The auto's are slow, to much power loss through the drivetrain.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: Gt vs. Sho 
    Donating Users JESSEGOTTA GP GT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    1,142
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Gotcha, it was an automatic. 220hp? where is it all going?
    New project: 2000 Red GTP.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: Gt vs. Sho 
    GXP Level Member Poil336's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Troy OH
    Posts
    2,919
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    like you said, it's a ford lol. i vaguely remember reading a comparison article between in and the gtp in 1997, and it wasn't even fair. the gtp demolished it as far as performance went. like he said, they were yamaha engines, i'm guessing they lacked a little in torque. the intake looks like a maze too.
    here's a pic of it, ignore the rice aspect to it: http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3813272
    99 GT - top swapped, S2X cam. - sadly, sold
    96 Firebird Formula - T-tops and exhaust leak. 14.26 @ 97.8 - sold
    2008 Chevrolet Cobalt SS - stock, in all of it's turbocharged awesomeness
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: Gt vs. Sho 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    You know a car was never designed to go fast when the speedo is dead centre.... It should at least be 50/50 or dead centre.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: Gt vs. Sho 
    Donating Users JESSEGOTTA GP GT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    1,142
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Don't they have secondary intakes, so after a certain rpm another one opens up? oh well, I thpught it wuld be a decent race because all my other ones were just boring.
    New project: 2000 Red GTP.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: Gt vs. Sho 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    So it was a bubble SHO? Those had the V8's in em. But ya...it should run better than that...I mean...the transmission's were horrible but they compared them to the GTP back in '97 when it came out and the P blew it out of the water in the test...I think it was Motor Trend that did it too. But it only ran low 15's high 14's IIRC. As for the 1st gen SHO...it was lighter and basically had the same power with a high revving V6 mated to a 5-spd. Those are the ones you want to run.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: Gt vs. Sho 
    I live here. siLversLeigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    mi
    Posts
    5,199
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JESSEGOTTA GP GT View Post
    The best part is after we got done I texted her and said "that's what happens when you drive a Ford" and she text me back saying " my CEL is on." And again, you'll never guess what I said back..... " thats seems to be a common problem with Fords"
    Lay off the haterade.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: Gt vs. Sho 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    759
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    The V8's are slow wa ****, the V6's are thr challenge. I've been looking to run one of those for awhile.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: Gt vs. Sho 
    donated to get this wow TorqueAutoMotiv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    stockton ca
    Posts
    5,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    a buddy of mine had a 98 sho with about 5k into it it ran sub 13's all day long
    not sure what all he had done though

    they had cam issues

    98 gtp sedan forest green ,S1X intense cam,Intense pcm,Magnaflow exhaust, ubend delete,TEP trans 3.29's,3.4 smoothflow mps,Dyno'd 281hp and 371ft #'s of trq at the wheels
    http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3338681
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: Gt vs. Sho 
    Donating Users JESSEGOTTA GP GT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    1,142
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I'd love to run the older body V6 ones, but I've only seen one in my whole 19 years on this earth. I've seen videos with them and they were pretty quick, thats why I was suprised when I ate that car alive. I was proud of the ol' GT. It's got 184k on it now.
    New project: 2000 Red GTP.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: Gt vs. Sho 
    youtu.be/xhrBDcQq2DM FoSHO99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maquoketa, Iowa
    Posts
    2,943
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    The 96-99's were nothing special, just V8 3.4L DOHC. And they did have cam problems, the fix was to weld each cam to the sprocket... lol. I had a 99 and the best thing about them was the handling and sound system. Blew the GTP out of the water in those 2 categories. They do have secondaries and they open around 3400rpm's, with an intake you should be able to tell when they open. The downfall to the car is the aftermarket availability. It was like $500 for a tune, $600-1000 to fix the cams by someone on the forums. The best times I saw were like 13's out of a fully tuned and nitrous setup.

    The best years were the 90-95. Some of those cars would beat up on a GTP stock vs. stock. The change in 96 came with the intake setup on the V8 motor, if they did the same setup as they did for the v6's, they would have made 60-100hp more. The downfall was the transmission so the motor was "detuned" so that the transmission reliability was not as big of an issue with a few hp less. When these cars first came out, they were ahead of their time, really paving the way for FWD sports sedans. It's probably safe to say the GTP would not even be around if it wasn't for the SHO.

    I think the 2010 SHO's are running mid-12's now with intake, low 12's with a tune.
    2001 GTP PT61 Turbo, E85, Stock Motor
    2011 Chevy Cruze MT6 1.4L Turbo
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: Gt vs. Sho 
    GT Level Member AdamBall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Wausau, WI
    Posts
    450
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: Gt vs. Sho 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Mansfield, Ohio
    Posts
    745
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by FoSHO99 View Post
    The 96-99's were nothing special, just V8 3.4L DOHC. And they did have cam problems, the fix was to weld each cam to the sprocket... lol. I had a 99 and the best thing about them was the handling and sound system. Blew the GTP out of the water in those 2 categories. They do have secondaries and they open around 3400rpm's, with an intake you should be able to tell when they open. The downfall to the car is the aftermarket availability. It was like $500 for a tune, $600-1000 to fix the cams by someone on the forums. The best times I saw were like 13's out of a fully tuned and nitrous setup.

    The best years were the 90-95. Some of those cars would beat up on a GTP stock vs. stock. The change in 96 came with the intake setup on the V8 motor, if they did the same setup as they did for the v6's, they would have made 60-100hp more. The downfall was the transmission so the motor was "detuned" so that the transmission reliability was not as big of an issue with a few hp less. When these cars first came out, they were ahead of their time, really paving the way for FWD sports sedans. It's probably safe to say the GTP would not even be around if it wasn't for the SHO.

    I think the 2010 SHO's are running mid-12's now with intake, low 12's with a tune.
    I'd hope so for almost $50,000
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: Gt vs. Sho 
    GTP Level Member KwazrollinZ28GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    FLINT/michigan
    Posts
    1,096
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Meh, slow ass Car if you ask me, my mom had one, squeaky bastards to.
    1997 GTP 2DR RaceKAR
    1994 Z28 intake, small cam, exhaust leak
    2000 silverado 5.3l Z71 3.73gear posi, 3.5" lift 33" tires DIABLO Tune
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: Gt vs. Sho 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Mansfield, Ohio
    Posts
    745
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by KwazrollinZ28GTP View Post
    Meh, slow ass Car if you ask me, my mom had one, squeaky bastards to.
    Early model years had transmissions with grenades built into them!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: Gt vs. Sho 
    GXP Level Member Poil336's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Troy OH
    Posts
    2,919
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    the new sho's are nice aside from being as big as a minivan lol. i love the "just because we can" cars. why build a 4 door family sedan with a twin turbo v6? the real question is, why not?
    99 GT - top swapped, S2X cam. - sadly, sold
    96 Firebird Formula - T-tops and exhaust leak. 14.26 @ 97.8 - sold
    2008 Chevrolet Cobalt SS - stock, in all of it's turbocharged awesomeness
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: Gt vs. Sho 
    Donating Users JESSEGOTTA GP GT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    1,142
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I would never buy one new or used, it's still a Taurus.
    New project: 2000 Red GTP.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19 Re: Gt vs. Sho 
    donated to get this wow TorqueAutoMotiv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    stockton ca
    Posts
    5,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    its funny how people bag on fords in here i know its a gm based chat and so on but lets face it gm is no better then ford they both make **** cars and decent cars

    98 gtp sedan forest green ,S1X intense cam,Intense pcm,Magnaflow exhaust, ubend delete,TEP trans 3.29's,3.4 smoothflow mps,Dyno'd 281hp and 371ft #'s of trq at the wheels
    http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3338681
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20 Re: Gt vs. Sho 
    Destroys cars izup69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    274
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TorqueAutoMotiv View Post
    its funny how people bag on fords in here i know its a gm based chat and so on but lets face it gm is no better then ford they both make **** cars and decent cars
    Absolutely true Absolutely hate my GP (only b/c I have had 4 tranys) LOVED MY 96 STANG (only b/c it was hella fast)
    06 base open cone,2.5 inch dp into high-flow cat,window tint,drilled rotors.
    97 GTP ubend delete,drilled and slotted rotors,de-badged,open cone,6k HID,All aftermarket speakers
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Tags for this Thread
sho

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •