Thread: GXP vs. Challenger

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 50
  1. #1 GXP vs. Challenger 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    34
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    2006 GXP 5.3L V8 with intake and headers vs. stock 2015 Challenger 3.6L V6Basic question: which wins the race? Which is faster? 1/4 mile?
    Matt
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: GXP vs. Challenger 
    GrandPrix Junkie ItHurtz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Antioch, IL
    Posts
    3,521
    Thanks (Received)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    17
    Dislikes (Received)
    2
    Pick on a v8 instead
    2000 GTPT Sold-brandonhall10 built trans
    2009 Challenger SRT8
    http://www.grandprixforums.net/threa...uestion.....no
    Expert at being gay.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: GXP vs. Challenger 
    Turbo is the way to go. Fivefingerdeathpunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    21,030
    Thanks (Received)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    45
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    If the stock 3.6 challenger doesn't spin I think it's a high 14's car.

    The GXP's biggest fault is being FWD so grip is going to be hard and they are somewhere around the 14.0-14.5 stock if you have grip and limited wheel spin with driver mod. You added a little horsepower with the headers so the top end is likely to be better and I'd just assume the GXP would win if you can get a decent launch.

    SMGPFC Member #1
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: GXP vs. Challenger 
    GrandPrix Junkie ItHurtz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Antioch, IL
    Posts
    3,521
    Thanks (Received)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    17
    Dislikes (Received)
    2
    14.5 with the 8 speed
    2000 GTPT Sold-brandonhall10 built trans
    2009 Challenger SRT8
    http://www.grandprixforums.net/threa...uestion.....no
    Expert at being gay.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: GXP vs. Challenger 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    34
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Fivefingerdeathpunch View Post
    If the stock 3.6 challenger doesn't spin I think it's a high 14's car.

    The GXP's biggest fault is being FWD so grip is going to be hard and they are somewhere around the 14.0-14.5 stock if you have grip and limited wheel spin with driver mod. You added a little horsepower with the headers so the top end is likely to be better and I'd just assume the GXP would win if you can get a decent launch.
    So, what about at a rolling start?
    Matt
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: GXP vs. Challenger 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    34
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ItHurtz View Post
    Pick on a v8 instead
    No one's being picked on. This isn't middle school, everyone involved are adults. New Challenger owner comes in barking that he's dusting everyone.
    Matt
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: GXP vs. Challenger 
    Donating Users 16MustangVet's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sh1t hole Afghanistan Currently
    Posts
    5,418
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    the 3.6 is more hp than the gxp i believe but its a tank of a dodge pig vs a fwd dinosaur.

    ill leave it as a drivers race.

    edit: damn only 305hp lol dodge needs to get with the program gms in the 330s with their 3.6 na engines.

    and the challenger is 3800 pounds lolololol less than half the hp of a hellpig and just as much weight.

    shouldnt take much to beat that tank.
    How I treat my car: wreck,fix, repeat.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: GXP vs. Challenger 
    GrandPrix Junkie ItHurtz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Antioch, IL
    Posts
    3,521
    Thanks (Received)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    17
    Dislikes (Received)
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Bloodpython171 View Post
    No one's being picked on. This isn't middle school, everyone involved are adults. New Challenger owner comes in barking that he's dusting everyone.
    Its easy to say you dust everyone when you race 16 sec cars. Who cares what the guy says? IMO you would loose, he has 8 gears to stay in the power band.

    If the guy thinks he is so fast go tell him to dust a R/T then proceed to call him a homo

    A 3.4 gtp would "dust you" mod that dam v8
    2000 GTPT Sold-brandonhall10 built trans
    2009 Challenger SRT8
    http://www.grandprixforums.net/threa...uestion.....no
    Expert at being gay.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: GXP vs. Challenger 
    Donating Users 16MustangVet's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sh1t hole Afghanistan Currently
    Posts
    5,418
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    i will say after driving a 2015 cadillac cts with an 8 speed and about 320 hp from the na 3.6 it would absolutely sh1t stomp a gxp. not to mention the cts and challenger are rwd.

    as for a dig good luck there if the driver has half a brain good lord its got twice as many gears as the gxp..... just saying.

    it pulls damn good all the way to over 120mph easy the 8 speed would make a difference like corey said.

    part of the reason i want to drive a damn 6th gen ss with the 8 speed is if im impressed with the 3.6 8 speed cts i can only imagine another 130ish hp and that trans in a ss camaro.
    Last edited by 16MustangVet; 04-08-2016 at 12:13 AM.
    How I treat my car: wreck,fix, repeat.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: GXP vs. Challenger 
    Turbo is the way to go. Fivefingerdeathpunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    21,030
    Thanks (Received)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    45
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I'd almost give the advantage to the GXP if you did it from a 30-40 roll and you kept it in first gear.

    Mainly because the GXP has 50-60 ft lbs of torque over the challanger just in stock form. The shift into 2nd with the stock 2.93's is going to put it right at 4,000ish rpm and peak torque to keep it moving nicely. I'd like to think that would be a helping hand on it's side.

    And the challenger being 300+ lbs more isnt helping alot.

    SMGPFC Member #1
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: GXP vs. Challenger 
    Awesome Level Member chrsmi1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    824
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I would have to go with GXP in a roll race. Even with 8 gears the torque from a 30 roll should pull you a half a car or so.

    But from a dig, yeah. Challenger. Sorry dude. Get some Nittos and you'll have a chance
    Comp G. E85, 2.8, Headers, Tune, Intake, S1X, 105# springs, 60 # injectors, 255 walbro,etc.

    *NEW* 2002 Camaro Z28- Lid, Headers, Catback

    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: GXP vs. Challenger 
    Donating Users 16MustangVet's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sh1t hole Afghanistan Currently
    Posts
    5,418
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    do you people not realize the 8 speed is paddle shift and has TWICE as many gears to choose from no matter what speed the roll starts at?

    lol thats why i said if the challenger driver had half a brain he could tap it down a few and let it rip all that gxp will see by then are some dodge tail lights.....

    dont believe me go drive a 8 speed car with paddle shift its entirely different feeling.

    tap shift 8 speed game over from a roll. IF the driver knows how to pick a gear properly vs speed for whatever roll....

    gxp is better off from a dig where it makes some torque and hope to get out front before the 8 speed takes over and laughs at the 4t6fail.....
    Last edited by 16MustangVet; 04-08-2016 at 12:49 AM.
    How I treat my car: wreck,fix, repeat.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: GXP vs. Challenger 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    27
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Gents - the cts 3.6 with an 8 speed did 0-60 in 6.0 and 1/4 in 14.6 @ 99. Gxp is 5.7 and 14.2 (stock) respectively. Assuming both from a dig and equal drivers the gxp has this against a challenger or cts 3.6.

    I think we need to remember seat of pants is not an instrumented test
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: GXP vs. Challenger 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    27
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Gents - the cts 3.6 with an 8 speed did 0-60 in 6.0 and 1/4 in 14.6 @ 99. Gxp is 5.7 and 14.2 (stock) respectively. Assuming both from a dig and equal drivers the gxp has this against a challenger or cts 3.6.

    I think we need to remember seat of pants is not an instrumented test
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: GXP vs. Challenger 
    GTP Level Member Impala131's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    709
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike The Canadian View Post
    Gents - the cts 3.6 with an 8 speed did 0-60 in 6.0 and 1/4 in 14.6 @ 99. Gxp is 5.7 and 14.2 (stock) respectively. Assuming both from a dig and equal drivers the gxp has this against a challenger or cts 3.6.

    I think we need to remember seat of pants is not an instrumented test
    Don't bring facts into GPF... people will get butthurt if their opinion is contrary to them.
    2003 Grand Prix GTP.... the journey begins again....
    E85 Self Tune with HPT, 80# Injectors, Gen V 3.4 pulley, SD Headers, AL605 Plugs
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: GXP vs. Challenger 
    GTP Level Member bonerjamz03's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Upper Darby, PA
    Posts
    565
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    4
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike The Canadian View Post
    Gents - the cts 3.6 with an 8 speed did 0-60 in 6.0 and 1/4 in 14.6 @ 99. Gxp is 5.7 and 14.2 (stock) respectively. Assuming both from a dig and equal drivers the gxp has this against a challenger or cts 3.6.

    I think we need to remember seat of pants is not an instrumented test
    Even if they are a few tenths slower, I would MUCH rather have a Challenger or CTS than a GXP (No offense Bloodypython171)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: GXP vs. Challenger 
    Turbo is the way to go. Fivefingerdeathpunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    21,030
    Thanks (Received)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    45
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Just because it has more gears doesn't make it ungodly faster. It still has less horsepower than this guys header/intake GXP, has less torque and weighs more. I still give the advantage to the GXP here.


    And also who cares about the chevy 3.6 cts with the 8 speed, he didn't even ask about that car nor do I think he even cares because that vehicle is not a challenger.

    SMGPFC Member #1
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: GXP vs. Challenger 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    All the almighty 3.4" guys coming in how they're beating GXP's.

    All I did was gear mine and have it tuned with a couple bolt-ons...and it's plenty quick enough without the bottle for what it is.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19 Re: GXP vs. Challenger 
    Donating Users 16MustangVet's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sh1t hole Afghanistan Currently
    Posts
    5,418
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bonerjamz03 View Post
    Even if they are a few tenths slower, I would MUCH rather have a Challenger or CTS than a GXP (No offense Bloodypython171)
    because BOTH are rwd?.... this guy gets it. lol
    How I treat my car: wreck,fix, repeat.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20 Re: GXP vs. Challenger 
    GTX Level Member Travisgt2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    leavenworth ks
    Posts
    1,745
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Bare facts challenger weighs 234lbs more right off gxp has 55ft tq more then the challenger to launch its heavy a$$ better (there both boats) challenger is 305hp gxp 303hp but headers and intake probably make then equal hp maybe giving a little more to it then the challenger. The gxp will hit its power curve sooner. Challenger has four more gears yes. But he will need them to real in the gxp. So what my bet is
    1/8 mile GXP wins
    1/4 mile to close to say
    Anything further the challenger would win unfortunately because of gear.

    Damn I set out writing this to say gxp would win but I'm not fully sure now.
    04 GT2: 180 t-stat, cold air intake, reptile tune, plog, hv3, gt1 cam, 90#springs, new push rods, new lifters, port polished heads, lim, uim and tb, 06 Impala brakes and steel brake lines. Cosmetic: black roof rails, under glow, Pontiac ground light, blue hud dic radio controls and cluster. To come custom hood.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Challenger Hellcat
    By 02 WS6 TA in forum Track Sessions and Kills
    Replies: 95
    Last Post: 05-15-2015, 05:02 PM
  2. My Turbo V6 Challenger
    By Craig4465 in forum Other Vehicles
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 11-25-2012, 07:37 PM
  3. my 05 gt vs Acura CL and a v6 challenger
    By sLpGPGT in forum Track Sessions and Kills
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 04-30-2012, 05:36 PM
  4. gp gxp vs challenger r/t
    By f3racer in forum Track Sessions and Kills
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-18-2011, 01:17 PM
  5. GTP vs. Challenger
    By SloEvil in forum Track Sessions and Kills
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 09-01-2009, 07:08 AM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •