Thread: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks...

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 81 to 97 of 97
  1. #81 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    Who is this guy? SubwayGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,295
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by J57ltr View Post
    So do you think there could be something to speed up the tach, like you were talking about the fuel gauge? I'm fine with the fuel gauge on my car, but the tach is just too lazy.

    Jeff
    On my '01, coming to a somewhat hard stop, my HUD will reach 0mph before my tachometer.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #82 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    GXP Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Tomball
    Posts
    2,633
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by stealthee View Post
    That difference is most likely related to DBW.
    I might be inclined to believe that, but when the trans shifts it should drop as quickly as the RPM's drop when shifting, it just seems like there is a lot of buffering going on. I remember on some gauges in older cars that we would reduce the capacitance value and the tach would react quicker. On this one I am not sure if that would be a viable solution or if it is just buffered by the BCM or PCM's output whichever controls it.

    Jeff
    An engine is an engine no matter the size.... I think Dr. Seuss said that... or maybe it was Big Weld....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #83 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    Donating Users Bronco Boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Coquitlam,BC,Canada
    Posts
    3,824
    Thanks (Received)
    5
    Likes (Received)
    23
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 01Grand PrixGT View Post
    When I hit the gas, the gas needle will actual rise lol. It will rise 1 or 2 ticks and then drop back down.
    The fix.... http://chrisb.users.superford.org/Gr...el_Sensor.html
    Chris B
    2009 CX-9
    ** SOLD ** 2002 GT
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #84 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    I live here. stealthee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    SWPA
    Posts
    8,782
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by J57ltr View Post
    I might be inclined to believe that, but when the trans shifts it should drop as quickly as the RPM's drop when shifting, it just seems like there is a lot of buffering going on. I remember on some gauges in older cars that we would reduce the capacitance value and the tach would react quicker. On this one I am not sure if that would be a viable solution or if it is just buffered by the BCM or PCM's output whichever controls it.

    Jeff
    I think you are confused here. The DBW is actually keeping the revs from dropping as fast as they used to, so what you are seeing on the tach, are the revs the engine is actually doing.


    2011 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS - DD mode
    1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT - Many mods to come
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #85 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    GXP Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Tomball
    Posts
    2,633
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Nope, I understand what you are saying, but when the engine shifts between gears and I can hear the engine RPM drop the tach is still moving down then settles at the RPM it should be. Remember that my exhaust is very loud so I know when the rpm drops. It also flares when I let off the gas, but it barley shows on the tach. There is defiantly some filtering in the tach.

    Jeff
    An engine is an engine no matter the size.... I think Dr. Seuss said that... or maybe it was Big Weld....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #86 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    Donating Users bandook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    1,781
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    27
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Time for a vid, Jeff.
    Top Swapped 01 Imp
    VS (very small?) cam, SD Headers, 2.8" pulley, 29°, ported everything, E85, AEM water/meth, Deka 60's, HPT tuned
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #87 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    GXP Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Tomball
    Posts
    2,633
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Lol, here we go again. Alright I'll make one on the way home.

    Jeff
    An engine is an engine no matter the size.... I think Dr. Seuss said that... or maybe it was Big Weld....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #88 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    GrandPrix Junkie HighOctaneRacing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Enfield, CT
    Posts
    3,360
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Bronco Boy View Post
    same as post #48 lol
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #89 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    Donating Users Bronco Boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Coquitlam,BC,Canada
    Posts
    3,824
    Thanks (Received)
    5
    Likes (Received)
    23
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by HighOctaneRacing View Post
    same as post #48 lol
    Sort of, I guess. LOL
    Chris B
    2009 CX-9
    ** SOLD ** 2002 GT
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #90 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    GXP Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Tomball
    Posts
    2,633
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    After watching it all the way home I'm now thinking that the trans just shifts that slow.

    Jeff
    An engine is an engine no matter the size.... I think Dr. Seuss said that... or maybe it was Big Weld....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #91 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    Who is this guy? SubwayGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,295
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by J57ltr View Post
    After watching it all the way home I'm now thinking that the trans just shifts that slow.

    Jeff
    You got my hopes up by saying you were gonna post a vid. Now I'm sad lol.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #92 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    GXP Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Tomball
    Posts
    2,633
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Well hopefully when I get a shift kit it can help that some. My PA doesn't bang into gear, but the shift is solid and crisp, the GP is slow and sluggish. If there is lag in the way the tach responds I can't tell because of the trans. I'm sure they transmissions are too far apart to use any of the parts between them.

    Jeff
    Last edited by J57ltr; 07-30-2015 at 09:30 AM. Reason: grammer
    An engine is an engine no matter the size.... I think Dr. Seuss said that... or maybe it was Big Weld....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #93 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    Killa Bee Scottydoggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    39,997
    Thanks (Received)
    63
    Likes (Received)
    166
    Dislikes (Received)
    5
    tranny guts are all the same, but the chains and gears and the hd diff are the only changes from one to the other. bill just took the guts from a h body trans and put them in a w body case. the outside of the case is different h to w body.

    shift kit and a tranny tune helps a lot.

    98 Buick Regal GS, F body brakes, Caddy STS wheels, tinted tails L36 bottom end, lightly ported heads, 1.95 roller rockers, headers, gen 5 N* 3.0 pulley, FSIC, 42 lb injectors, a BrandonHall rebuilt trans, DHP tuned and AEM water/Meth injection https://goo.gl/gpV5kW
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #94 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    GrandPrix Junkie HighOctaneRacing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Enfield, CT
    Posts
    3,360
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by J57ltr View Post
    Well hopefully when I get a shift kit I can help that some. My PA doesn't bang into gear, but the shift is solid and crisp, the GP is slow and sluggish. If there is lag in the way the tach responds I can't tell because of the trans. I'm sure they transmissions are too far apart to use any of the parts between them.

    Jeff
    Have you changed your filter?

    Sent from my LG G3
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #95 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    GXP Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Tomball
    Posts
    2,633
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    No I haven't on either car actually PA is 176K GP is 141K. I planned on doing that when I did the shift kit. Which should be in the next couple of weeks.

    Jeff
    An engine is an engine no matter the size.... I think Dr. Seuss said that... or maybe it was Big Weld....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #96 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    Donating Users bandook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    1,781
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    27
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Shift kit ftw. I had reptile do me a tranny tune, but I recently put it back to stock for now (trying to cure this tcc kr issue) and I'm fine without the tune.
    Top Swapped 01 Imp
    VS (very small?) cam, SD Headers, 2.8" pulley, 29°, ported everything, E85, AEM water/meth, Deka 60's, HPT tuned
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #97 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    GXP Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Tomball
    Posts
    2,633
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I need a way to tune, but can't see shelling out the money until I have headers and exhaust, P&P heads, LIM, SC and an IC. I think in the meantime I will get someone to tune it for a few tweaks here and there. But the shift kit is pretty high on the list, and it's looking like a radiator is in order. 5/8" thin core what was someone thinking?

    Jeff
    An engine is an engine no matter the size.... I think Dr. Seuss said that... or maybe it was Big Weld....
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Similar Threads

  1. Tanks silver 04 GT2 (lots of pics)
    By Grandprix202 in forum Members Rides
    Replies: 787
    Last Post: 11-02-2016, 11:46 PM
  2. tanks projector build
    By Grandprix202 in forum Visual/Body Modifications
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 06-28-2014, 08:20 PM
  3. Fuel Tanks
    By grandamle91 in forum 3.8L V6 Naturally Aspirated (L36)(L26)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-22-2011, 02:12 PM
  4. how many gallons are our tanks?
    By k5greek in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 12-20-2010, 12:54 PM
  5. This one baffles me!
    By UR LOSN in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-18-2009, 04:15 AM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •