Thread: 2.93 vs 3.29

Results 1 to 20 of 23

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1 Re: 2.93 vs 3.29 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    No one? Okay... I guess we can speculate then until someone has hard numbers...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: 2.93 vs 3.29 
    I live here. SlowNA06's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    5,928
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Maybe this'll get you started? If you identified a purpose, I'm sure someone could steer you to where you want to go. I mean, unless you just have a data collection fetish or you're an archivist of silly facts or something.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: 2.93 vs 3.29 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SlowNA06 View Post
    Maybe this'll get you started? If you identified a purpose, I'm sure someone could steer you to where you want to go. I mean, unless you just have a data collection fetish or you're an archivist of silly facts or something.
    A lot of people think that switching to 3.29s lowers your trap speed. A lot of people think that switching to 3.29s does not lower your trap speed. I was trying to find people who have swapped the gears without doing any other changes and ran their cars again and see the difference.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Tags for this Thread
293, 329

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •