Thread: Why is there still KR?

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 68
  1. #21 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    TDCRacing
    Guest
    ok i think i got it...to get rid of all tm do this...on the tr 1-2 2-3 3-4 performance upshift....stock values should be somewhere around 340...change that to 640 or as high as it will allow....leave the ''normal'' setting alone and just change the performance. These changes will only take affect when the performance button is pressed on the shifter...when on normal, settings will remain stock. If the car has no performance shift button...then do the same but just on the ''normal'' setting.


    Also max out ''max engine torqe for upshift''


    hmmm....max turbine tq tcc locked and unocked...may want to ask someone else on this one....if it were me just max out ''max turbine tq tcc unlocked''


    Other wise you will more than likely get a lot of kr when you get into the throttle while the tcc is locked if you up the max tq values.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #22 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    TDCRacing
    Guest
    ok i think i got it...to get rid of all tm do this...on the tr 1-2 2-3 3-4 performance upshift....stock values should be somewhere around 340...change that to 640 or as high as it will allow....leave the ''normal'' setting alone and just change the performance. These changes will only take affect when the performance button is pressed on the shifter...when on normal, settings will remain stock. If the car has no performance shift button...then do the same but just on the ''normal'' setting.


    Also max out ''max engine torqe for upshift''


    hmmm....max turbine tq tcc locked and unocked...may want to ask someone else on this one....if it were me just max out ''max turbine tq tcc unlocked''


    Other wise you will more than likely get a lot of kr when you get into the throttle while the tcc is locked if you up the max tq values.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #23 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    GTX Level Member Andrew_99GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New Salem, ND
    Posts
    763
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    the PT TM upshift files are just percentages (if that makes sense). They are already lowered to 5%. In other words they will only derate the torque by 5%.
    Red 2dr 99 GTP"Old" Z7 t66, A/A IC'd, Custom Heads, 65# Inj, ST2 Cam, Meziere Elec Pump, JP Double Roller(with machined crank gear), Plogs, PLX W/B, Powrtuner SOLD

    "New" 2007 Duramax ccsb with a few mods
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #24 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    GrandPrix Junkie Sabrewings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Barksdale AFB, LA
    Posts
    4,879
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TDCRacing View Post
    hmmm....max turbine tq tcc locked and unocked...may want to ask someone else on this one....if it were me just max out ''max turbine tq tcc unlocked''
    Also, upping the max torque when turbine locked will rid you of some part throttle KR (since the PCM is trying to limit the torque when TCC is locked, and that is usually where the cruising part throttle KR comes from).
    2004 Impala LS - got some mods sold!!!
    2009 Subaru Impreza WRX STI

    NAIOA moderator Still Imp'n, just in a different Imp.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #25 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    TDCRacing
    Guest
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #26 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    TDCRacing
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew_99GTP View Post
    the PT TM upshift files are just percentages (if that makes sense). They are already lowered to 5%. In other words they will only derate the torque by 5%.
    are you sure that if you lower the percentage that it is not making the tm lower also...in other words you may be putting more tm on instead of removing it.


    higher numbers in hpt mean less tm...try raising them and see how high it will let you go.


    also there should be a spark retard amount for the torque reduction % or something related to how much spark is being pulled to reach the set torque reduction amount.


    check under the spark tab...or gimme a screen shot....where is brian when i need him lol...he uses dhp also
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #27 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    Bastard Reptile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    3,459
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I think that in PT it is like it pulls 5% of the power at the shifts.

    You have 2 different TM tables that you need to look at. one of them is in the spark settings, the rest is in the transmission setttings. I have my max turbine torque settings at 800....but that's because I don't really care about my TM issues, I'm all about the speed, I can pretty much fix anything that breaks. But I wouldn't recommend doing this to any car.

    Sorry, I'm tired, and I just kind of skimmed through the thread. TM isn't all bad....I was just saying that it will register as KR, nothing wrong with that once you eliminate the usual suspects.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #28 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    GTX Level Member Andrew_99GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New Salem, ND
    Posts
    763
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    TDC I am working on getting you some screen shots. I do understand what you are talking about.
    Red 2dr 99 GTP"Old" Z7 t66, A/A IC'd, Custom Heads, 65# Inj, ST2 Cam, Meziere Elec Pump, JP Double Roller(with machined crank gear), Plogs, PLX W/B, Powrtuner SOLD

    "New" 2007 Duramax ccsb with a few mods
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #29 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    TDCRacing
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Reptile View Post
    I think that in PT it is like it pulls 5% of the power at the shifts.

    You have 2 different TM tables that you need to look at. one of them is in the spark settings, the rest is in the transmission setttings. I have my max turbine torque settings at 800....but that's because I don't really care about my TM issues, I'm all about the speed, I can pretty much fix anything that breaks. But I wouldn't recommend doing this to any car.

    Sorry, I'm tired, and I just kind of skimmed through the thread. TM isn't all bad....I was just saying that it will register as KR, nothing wrong with that once you eliminate the usual suspects.



    There the hell you are!!!!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #30 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    TDCRacing
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew_99GTP View Post
    TDC I am working on getting you some screen shots. I do understand what you are talking about.
    take ur time i should be here....the main thing i need to know is how the tm settings work...or how the % affect the reduction or addition of tm...but i think brian probably has that down packed....



    tell me what the stock settings are for the max turbine tq tcc locked and unlocked...if it is lower than 800 then you raise those values to get rid of tm...if it is higher then you lower those values...im going off of what brian has said
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #31 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    GTX Level Member Andrew_99GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New Salem, ND
    Posts
    763
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Does anyone know what brake torque limit is?

    Red 2dr 99 GTP"Old" Z7 t66, A/A IC'd, Custom Heads, 65# Inj, ST2 Cam, Meziere Elec Pump, JP Double Roller(with machined crank gear), Plogs, PLX W/B, Powrtuner SOLD

    "New" 2007 Duramax ccsb with a few mods
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #32 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    TDCRacing
    Guest
    should be amount of tq that is allowed while brakes are engaged...hpt does not have this...not to my knowledge anyway


    thats the only thing that makes sense to me



    shoot now that i look at it...if it were for that it seems the values should all be the same...not increasing....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #33 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    TDCRacing
    Guest
    on the s/s you provided...did you alter any of the tables? if not did someone else?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #34 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    GTX Level Member Andrew_99GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New Salem, ND
    Posts
    763
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TDCRacing View Post
    should be amount of tq that is allowed while brakes are engaged...hpt does not have this...not to my knowledge anyway


    thats the only thing that makes sense to me



    shoot now that i look at it...if it were for that it seems the values should all be the same...not increasing....
    Kind of what I thought but PT tables are hard to understand sometimes. I completely understand how to tune, what I have trouble with is figuring out the table descriptions.

    Here is the description from the tm up shift table

    Percentage of total torque reduction for 1-2 upshiftusing Performance pressure pattern

    So in other words it is set to 5 right now, it will only reduce torque by 5%.
    Red 2dr 99 GTP"Old" Z7 t66, A/A IC'd, Custom Heads, 65# Inj, ST2 Cam, Meziere Elec Pump, JP Double Roller(with machined crank gear), Plogs, PLX W/B, Powrtuner SOLD

    "New" 2007 Duramax ccsb with a few mods
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #35 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    GTX Level Member Andrew_99GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New Salem, ND
    Posts
    763
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Yes they are altered.
    Red 2dr 99 GTP"Old" Z7 t66, A/A IC'd, Custom Heads, 65# Inj, ST2 Cam, Meziere Elec Pump, JP Double Roller(with machined crank gear), Plogs, PLX W/B, Powrtuner SOLD

    "New" 2007 Duramax ccsb with a few mods
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #36 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    GTX Level Member Andrew_99GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New Salem, ND
    Posts
    763
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    got another screen shot coming, I think this is the table we need to mess with.
    Red 2dr 99 GTP"Old" Z7 t66, A/A IC'd, Custom Heads, 65# Inj, ST2 Cam, Meziere Elec Pump, JP Double Roller(with machined crank gear), Plogs, PLX W/B, Powrtuner SOLD

    "New" 2007 Duramax ccsb with a few mods
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #37 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    GTX Level Member Andrew_99GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New Salem, ND
    Posts
    763
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Red 2dr 99 GTP"Old" Z7 t66, A/A IC'd, Custom Heads, 65# Inj, ST2 Cam, Meziere Elec Pump, JP Double Roller(with machined crank gear), Plogs, PLX W/B, Powrtuner SOLD

    "New" 2007 Duramax ccsb with a few mods
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #38 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    TDCRacing
    Guest
    on the max tq upshift table the one you have a s/s of...on the stock bin file...were the numbers increasing from low rpm to high or the other way around? or were they all the same?


    i belive they should have more tm applied in the lower rpm ranges....


    im just trying to figure out what these numbers mean.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #39 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    TDCRacing
    Guest
    yea i saw it in the last screen shot....that is one for sure but anwser my lasty question above...by the way the tq abuse spark retard table looks good...zeroed out means no spark is beaing puled
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #40 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    GTX Level Member Andrew_99GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New Salem, ND
    Posts
    763
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TDCRacing View Post
    on the max tq upshift table the one you have a s/s of...on the stock bin file...were the numbers increasing from low rpm to high or the other way around? or were they all the same?


    i belive they should have more tm applied in the lower rpm ranges....


    im just trying to figure out what these numbers mean.
    Are you talking about the last table I gave a screen shot of? If so that is the stock table.
    Red 2dr 99 GTP"Old" Z7 t66, A/A IC'd, Custom Heads, 65# Inj, ST2 Cam, Meziere Elec Pump, JP Double Roller(with machined crank gear), Plogs, PLX W/B, Powrtuner SOLD

    "New" 2007 Duramax ccsb with a few mods
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •