Thread: VE tuning....not necessary?

Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. #1 VE tuning....not necessary? 
    SE Level Member PacerSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East Bay, CA
    Posts
    13
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I was recently told that a VE tune isn't necessary. This was brought up due to my suggestion of running an L32 MAP on my top swap to be able to have a 2-bar and read boost for VE tuning purposes. I was informed that it wasn't an issue to be able to read boost since the MAP is only used on startup(no boost) and MAF failure instances. With that in mind after all of the tuning research I have done I heard that a VE tune is the foundation of tuning and should be done to get idle and cruise down before moving on. What is everyone's take on this?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: VE tuning....not necessary? 
    Donating Users Lawngoose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Outer Space
    Posts
    1,250
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I don't tune VE... however, many swear by it. Many will tell you that VE is only good if your MAF goes out... other's will say do this first and it will help you tune in your fuel trims better ( MAF tune).
    .
    My vote is no, others can chime in..
    02 GTP 13.6 @ 100mph - SOLD
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: VE tuning....not necessary? 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    like goose said, you only need it if your MAF is whacked.

    i liked having a good VE tune because i didnt want to rely on solely the MAF, even though thats what the car does. given the chance i would eliminate the MAF and run the car speed density.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: VE tuning....not necessary? 
    GTP Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    628
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    in my tuning experience, some cars (different years) use the VE and some dont, The way to test is to zero everything out and try.

    my car is very dependent on the VE, and wouldnt idle with out a good VE tune
    2003 SSEi,
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: VE tuning....not necessary? 
    SE Level Member PacerSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East Bay, CA
    Posts
    13
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    That's my main concern, I'm going to be utilizing a pretty aggressive cam. With that in mind I think that strictly MAF tuning the beast would be a PITA and probably not yield much for idle.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: VE tuning....not necessary? 
    GT Level Member TurboKent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Woodward, OK
    Posts
    207
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    In my opinion you would want to go ahead and tune for VE especially if you are putting in a cam because that will change your numbers from a stock cam. Even if it is only used when the maf fails i wouldn't want to be at the track at 6000 rpm when the maf decides to give out and the computer is only thinking your getting a smaller amount of air and your fueling gets all screwed up, possible to cause damage.
    2003 Grand Prix turbo intercooled
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: VE tuning....not necessary? 
    Donating Users Tengis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    351
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    That's my main concern, I'm going to be utilizing a pretty aggressive cam. With that in mind I think that strictly MAF tuning the beast would be a PITA and probably not yield much for idle.
    VE tuning is useless. Ive experimented on 25+ Grand Prixs of all different years with various OSIDs.

    MAF tuning is not a PITA at ALL if you know what you are doing. You can go to a full time open loop tune to eliminate fuel trim issues with the cam. Again, if you know what you are doing, you can do a full open loop tune with a wideband in like an hour assuming there are no issues on just about any car. Idle will be rock solid at whatever you set it to no matter what.

    Pwned.
    Silver R32 Skyline GTS-T
    Satin Purple 97 GTP
    Blue 01 IS4 + M112 hybrid GTP
    Satin Black 98 Turbo GTP
    ZZP recommended installer - Kratos Concepts
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: VE tuning....not necessary? 
    SE Level Member PacerSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East Bay, CA
    Posts
    13
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tengis View Post

    Pwned.
    Really I got pwned for asking a question, wow. I would've never knew. Jackass.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: VE tuning....not necessary? 
    youtu.be/xhrBDcQq2DM FoSHO99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maquoketa, Iowa
    Posts
    2,943
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tengis View Post
    VE tuning is useless. Ive experimented on 25+ Grand Prixs of all different years with various OSIDs.

    MAF tuning is not a PITA at ALL if you know what you are doing. You can go to a full time open loop tune to eliminate fuel trim issues with the cam. Again, if you know what you are doing, you can do a full open loop tune with a wideband in like an hour assuming there are no issues on just about any car. Idle will be rock solid at whatever you set it to no matter what.

    Pwned.
    X2 Pwned.
    2001 GTP PT61 Turbo, E85, Stock Motor
    2011 Chevy Cruze MT6 1.4L Turbo
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: VE tuning....not necessary? 
    SE Level Member PacerSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East Bay, CA
    Posts
    13
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Yeah feel free to explain said pwnage, I'm really curious now. I must be missing something.

    So was it the part where MAF tuning a car with an aggressive cam and Stage 4 heads being a PITA? Or the fact that because he thinks that VE tuning is pointless and has tuned other cars makes it fact? I'm really wondering.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: VE tuning....not necessary? 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    he is saying that you can easily MAF tune a car to however you want it to run so long as you know what youre doing and that VE tuning is far less accurate.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: VE tuning....not necessary? 
    SE Level Member PacerSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East Bay, CA
    Posts
    13
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Ok, sounds feasible. Is that the majority opinion? I see it as to be about split so far in this thread. But researching has suggested both I guess, I was just asking if it's reasonable to rely on MAF only.

    So with that being said shouldn't one at least attempt to get a semi-decent VE tune going as a "worst case" backup in the event a MAF does fail?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: VE tuning....not necessary? 
     

  14. #14 Re: VE tuning....not necessary? 
    Donating Users Tengis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    351
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    if you want a great tune, do both.
    Or you can put whatever numbers you want to in your VE table and then realize that its not effecting your tune. If we were talking about a Cobalt PCM... then ya, you have to do a VE tune. Our PCMs seem to be archaic and only use the VE table when the MAF doesnt work.

    I just tuned a 344whp 377wtq non intercooled S1X car... with a stock VE table.
    I just tuned a 373whp 398wtq intercooled XP car... with a stock VE table.
    I also run a stock VE table on my car.
    Silver R32 Skyline GTS-T
    Satin Purple 97 GTP
    Blue 01 IS4 + M112 hybrid GTP
    Satin Black 98 Turbo GTP
    ZZP recommended installer - Kratos Concepts
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: VE tuning....not necessary? 
    SE Level Member geforcextreme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Holland Pa 18966
    Posts
    38
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I messed around with VE tuning and it did jack for my car. It is said "some" cars reference the VE tables and others don't mine certainly doesn't use this table what so ever.

    I zeroed out the VE table and as well put some crazy numbers in the VE table and nothing happened. The only time my car would use the VE table is if my maf fails.

    I tried to VE tune my car back in the day and what a mess that was trying to keep the car going without a maf sensor.

    My VE table is bone stock and don't see a need for touching it.
    2000 Buick Regal GSE Blown, Cammed, Intercooled, and pretty fast for a Grocery Getter - 320WHP
    Best Time June 9th 2009: 1/4 = 12.994 @ 107.82mph on Street Tires 2.118 60 Foot
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: VE tuning....not necessary? 
    GTP Level Member 01gpgt01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Hagerstown,Md
    Posts
    1,933
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    VE tune=Waste The end
    2001 GT. A few here and there mods http://www.streetfire.net/video/2001...ynp_208097.htm

    2009 Hummer H3 Solar flare premium
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: VE tuning....not necessary? 
    SE Level Member Phantom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Independence KY
    Posts
    38
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I believe that VE is referenced during times of open loop such as start up and decel (aka. Deceleration enleanment). I have also tried setting the VE to stock,0,100,150 and the only thing I noticed when doing this and performing back to back 0-60runs and a circle back to the starting point was that when set to 150 my engine turned off during the run I had to pull over and it would not start till I re flashed it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: VE tuning....not necessary? 
    GTP Level Member 01gpgt01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Hagerstown,Md
    Posts
    1,933
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Mines been stock for as long as ive owned the car. I dicked around with it years back but it didnt do chit. My trims lock my trims sit pretty. My car starts after many hot lapping 1/4 mile runs back to back. Just my 2 cents
    2001 GT. A few here and there mods http://www.streetfire.net/video/2001...ynp_208097.htm

    2009 Hummer H3 Solar flare premium
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. Tuning help
    By MakeitLouder97 in forum PCM Tuning
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-02-2010, 07:48 PM
  2. what does tuning do to your car
    By triplecanopy in forum Off Topic Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-23-2008, 11:33 AM
  3. need a little tuning help
    By 98daytona500 in forum PCM Tuning
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-04-2008, 07:45 AM
  4. Tuning?
    By 04gpking85 in forum PCM Tuning
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 11-25-2008, 11:28 PM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •