Thread: Spectre interested in creating a CAI for the 3.8 GPs

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 29 of 29
  1. #21 Re: Spectre interested in creating a CAI for the 3.8 GPs 
    GT Level Member GreyGhost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    419
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I have no idea what design/setup you are talking about. Sorry.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #22 Re: Spectre interested in creating a CAI for the 3.8 GPs 
    Specialist Walter US Army Spartan GL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Largo, Florida, United States
    Posts
    2,907
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    ill dig up a pic..

    XPZ, Alum heads,150#, I/C, GEN V mps 3.0, N* TB CAI K&N fully built trans, JE pistons, L32 rods, Comp lifters, PRJ Fuel rails, 65# Injectors, elec pump, MSD wires, MSD coils, Alum control arms, AGX, vogtland, GMPP sway bars, rear trailing arms
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #23 Re: Spectre interested in creating a CAI for the 3.8 GPs 
    GT Level Member BoostedComp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Youngstown
    Posts
    451
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    i guess i can put effort in... lol



    hmm i cant find the images of people having them in car... but it was a good design it seemed.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #24 Re: Spectre interested in creating a CAI for the 3.8 GPs 
     

  5. #25 Re: Spectre interested in creating a CAI for the 3.8 GPs 
    GT Level Member Swash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Excelsior Springs, MO
    Posts
    448
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    The JMB is a nice piece - but FAR from perfect. A list of improvements would include:

    1) The connection at the TB must be flexible/adjustable and really should fit OVER the inlet side and clamp down into the recessed area where the stock boot sits. This would probably require a custom made piece, but would be a great improvement. It would also allow the tube to be slightly shorter - making installation easier...the current design it TIGHT to the inside of the fender panel.
    2) Block off plate should not be aluminum - or metal of any kind (unless special ordered for bling purposes). It should be a plastic (urethane, etc) to prevent rattling and scratching of the intake tube.
    3) JMB's design was good, but the overall shape/contour of the TDC (sorry) unit was better, IMO. That would be a better unit to start from when developing the shape.
    4) The question of whether or not a 4" tube is better than a 3" tube is really not that important. The relative gain with the larger tube is so minute that it's honestly not even worth discussing. Conversely - the cost of fabricating a 4" tube vs. 3" IS a factor to consider. I, for one; would not pay more to have no gain.
    5) Yes, as with most anything - cost is king. If someone were to offer a unit with a variety of standard colors (powdercoated) for under $150, it would be a win.

    Just my $.02...

    -Swash
    I'm sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of how awesome I am...
    2004 IBM/Black/A4 GTO -- 1 of 273 - and the slowest
    2002 Galaxy Silver GTP - a few mods - sold
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #26 Re: Spectre interested in creating a CAI for the 3.8 GPs 
    SE Level Member PALMCASTER GT1's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    PALMDALE CA
    Posts
    144
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TorqueAutoMotiv View Post
    shame im like 300 miles away id donate myy ride to get fitted
    id be intrested im running a spectra open cone now
    i got one in my 04 gt1 now,i don't have anything wrong with my car .
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #27 Re: Spectre interested in creating a CAI for the 3.8 GPs 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    23
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bio248 View Post
    yeah, except less ****ty.

    they should make two intakes: an FWI and a short ram. the FWI would mimic the JMB intake and the short ram would be similar to the K&N unit, but the need for a sealed box is completely unnecessary.



    go to college and learn physics. the 4" has the ability to flow the amount of air the motors need when wide open throttle. a 3" is limiting the ability to flow, but increases velocity. for a blower car you want as much flow potential as possible.
    You dont need a college degree to figure this out. Just some common sense. What good is a 4" intake when you have a 2.5" or 3" exhaust? You cant flow more into the engine than what the exhaust is able to flow out. Yes the POTENTIAL is there but you cant take advantage of it unless you are flowing insane amounts of air and then the exhaust would be holding you back anyway until you also upgrade the exhaust. so please convince us why a 4" intake is necessary for us oh wise one?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #28 Re: Spectre interested in creating a CAI for the 3.8 GPs 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    to be honest the power gain from 3" to 4" pipe is minimal. also, anyone with headers has just opened up the exhaust so much that it will never be a restriction again. hell, these cars do great with just a 3" downpipe. once the exhaust is opened up the next place is the intake. once the intake is opened up the next thing is the valvetrain. the stock cam and rockers can only move so much air. with higher ratio rockers or a cam with more lift, the car is able to move more air.

    most people never get as far as wanting a cam in their car, but some do. id say once your intercooled or are running a cam its time to go open cone anyway. this negates all tubing anyway. so i guess what im getting at here is that you can run whatever you want, but you sure as hell want it to be bigger than the throttle body inlet, which is 3.5". my reasoning isnt so much about needing a bigger intake, its about the want for it and the room to grow from there.

    also, dont be a smart ass.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #29 Re: Spectre interested in creating a CAI for the 3.8 GPs 
    donated to get this wow TorqueAutoMotiv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    stockton ca
    Posts
    5,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    i guess for me flow is somewhat important to me but im in it for the show to I like the way a good intake looks

    98 gtp sedan forest green ,S1X intense cam,Intense pcm,Magnaflow exhaust, ubend delete,TEP trans 3.29's,3.4 smoothflow mps,Dyno'd 281hp and 371ft #'s of trq at the wheels
    http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3338681
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. spectre open cone IAT placement.
    By BoostJunki3 in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-16-2010, 07:47 PM
  2. Creating my own cai for a GXP
    By BennysGP in forum How To Write-Ups/Tech Tips
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-06-2010, 08:02 AM
  3. K&N vs. spectre
    By BoostJunki3 in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-04-2010, 12:59 PM
  4. Supercharger Not Creating boost.
    By Nicorette02 in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-12-2008, 04:28 PM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •