Thread: Scangauge 2 first impression

I bought both, and sold both. What I like the most about the scangauge II with X-gauge is that since I have an Impala, I don't have to deal with the 3 pod gauge cluster which IMO looks out of place, like, well, we all know what the huge winged slow disposable cars look like. Oh yeah the price was about $90 less than the Aeroforce, and only needs connection to the OBDII port, no other power access needed. This gauge is also very handy for throwing in quickly for a quick monitoring.

The Aeroforce can scan more total parameters, has the additional input/outputs (connector your scanner, other sensors, WB etc.

Really two somewhat similar things you may buy for different reasons. IMO there is no right or wrong, it's a matter of what meets your needs.

My HPTuners is all I need.

Originally Posted by garyd02gtp

I have read that the scangauge had issues with KR readings, the MOST important reading IMO. Most sounded VERY inaccurate- so why get it??

they were accurate, however, the decimal point was missing ie 11 was actually 1.1, as I understand it. We can certainly prove this since I have an HPTuners.

Originally Posted by IndeedSS

Oh yeah the price was about $90 less than the Aeroforce, and only needs connection to the OBDII port, no other power access needed.

I can't argue with the price, but it offers more in a smaller package. As for the power, mine simply plugs in to the OBD2 port and works.