thrasher cam anyone use one

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by darkhorizon

You must have some magical rockers because I have never seen a rocker increase the lobe lift of a cam before.

The average chump running stock rockers and 130# springs on a TEP cam is going to see ~600-605 peak lift.

---

Oh I'm sure....600 lift, makes logical sense.

.574/.566 = S1X + 1.8's....totally, lol.

Good thing I was talking about "peak" lift to begin with...guess I had to dumb it down for you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bluegtp91

Oh I'm sure....600 lift, makes logical sense.

.574/.566 = S1X + 1.8's....totally, lol.

Good thing I was talking about "peak" lift to begin with...guess I had to dumb it down for you.

---

yea, about 574.. which is 25 less than a trasher, which makes sense...

What is the problem here cupcake?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by darkhorizon

yea, about 574.. which is 25 less than a trasher, which makes sense...

---

What did you just say here?

The "Thrasher Cam" they are selling now is no longer a .566/.566...its a .574/.566 on 1.6 rockers.

Also, an S1X makes what... .514/.526 peak...so...with 1.8 rockers...lol...

.577/.592...hmmm, seems that an S1X with 1.8's is quite larger than a Thrasher...

You, make no sense.

I made sense from the get go, like a boss.

Quote:

---

The "Thrasher Cam" they are selling now is no longer a .566/.566...its a .574/.566 on 1.6 rockers.

---

Gratz, I said stock rockers not 1.6 rollers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by darkhorizon

Gratz, I said stock rockers not 1.6 rollers.

---

Which is still made up crap that you say make different peak lift numbers and you have yet to prove, just like in the other thread.

Boy...didn't this go full circle.

I said VERY clearly why I am not proving how a stock rocker works. The numbers I came up with are of low precision and I am not going to spread a derived number around the internet, when I could build a rig with more precision to accurately measure it with different camshafts.

To come up with the numbers i came up with, I had to use quite a bit of calculus, and as I said before I always found peak ratio numbers on XP+ sized cams to be larger than 1.7 ratio. My specific numbers were actually very close to 1.8 on the NIC cam I tried to profile.

When dealing in .001 measurements, rig setup is very important... Mine sucked but it was accurate enough to give me a good start for my graphing calculator and give me an answer to some yes or no questions I was looking to answer in a specific setup.

all this over a cam o boy lol

A dumb cam might I add.

Is your name Nick?

So far the three Nicks have run this cam at some point.

it happens to the best of us.

Sounds awesome.

Should be all you need.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIW9XK_WMR4

no my names not nick its billy and i think that sounds bad azz