Thread: 2000 SE stock top speed?

Who cares.

You don't need to travel faster on the road than you can trap in the quarter mile.

So, considering your driving a mid to high 16 second car...

No more than 90.

Evah.

ive held mine on the govern for 10+ miles, even tho thats 107 but still
had no problems with it

Gearing doesn't defeat physics.

Originally Posted by Nixon

Gearing doesn't defeat physics.

Horsepower does.

Originally Posted by Hippo Machine

Horsepower does.

So, if gearing doesn't defeat physics then how come a stock GT will beat a stock GTP 0-40MPH? The only advantageous difference the GT has is it's gearing. Both cars are under the same forces so I'd like to see how gearing doesn't matter.

Doesn't seem right. Not in the least.

****ty tires on a GTP will **** with it's 0-40.

There's just too many factors to consider here Stock GT vs Stock GTP.

Originally Posted by Nixon

177HP actually.

No.

100 x 1.33

(133)

133 x 1.33

(176.89)

Originally Posted by Nixon

100 x 1.33

(133)

133 x 1.33

(176.89)

lol.

100HP = 100MPH

120MPH = ? HP



((120/100)^3 ) * 100HP = 172.8 HP

~ 173HP

^all that x 7= racekar

I think the point here is that a 3.1 powered vehicle has no business going 120 anyway.

/end.

my 3.1...has never seen anything above 85. and i dont want it to. it has enough struggle as it is...and to the guy that said his 95 reached 127? HAHA that is some BS because i have a 95 with that same engine, and it struggles at 85.

stress.