Who cares.
You don't need to travel faster on the road than you can trap in the quarter mile.
So, considering your driving a mid to high 16 second car...
No more than 90.
Evah.
Printable View
Who cares.
You don't need to travel faster on the road than you can trap in the quarter mile.
So, considering your driving a mid to high 16 second car...
No more than 90.
Evah.
ive held mine on the govern for 10+ miles, even tho thats 107 but still
had no problems with it
Gearing doesn't defeat physics.
So, if gearing doesn't defeat physics then how come a stock GT will beat a stock GTP 0-40MPH? The only advantageous difference the GT has is it's gearing. Both cars are under the same forces so I'd like to see how gearing doesn't matter.
Doesn't seem right. Not in the least.
****ty tires on a GTP will **** with it's 0-40.
There's just too many factors to consider here Stock GT vs Stock GTP.
100 x 1.33
(133)
133 x 1.33
(176.89)
^all that x 7= racekar
I think the point here is that a 3.1 powered vehicle has no business going 120 anyway.
/end.
my 3.1...has never seen anything above 85. and i dont want it to. it has enough struggle as it is...and to the guy that said his 95 reached 127? HAHA that is some BS because i have a 95 with that same engine, and it struggles at 85.
Yeah It took forever to get up to 127, it was verified by a friend in an STI.
Also, what is the difference between that going 120+ and my GTP other than my 95 bring about 200 lbs lighter and more aerodynamic.
stress.