Snow, buy injectors that are characterized.
Save you some time tuning.
|
|
11-07-2011
Snow, buy injectors that are characterized.
Save you some time tuning.
11-07-2011
It's a 2 year old stock replacement with a rewire and a high flow fuel filter. I just need to check the fuel pressure at the rail during a WOT run and we'll have the answer. Could be either IMO, but I'd like it to be maxed injectorsOriginally Posted by dsmuts
11-14-2011
sh*t is goin down!!!ORIGINAL: SLoW SHO
Dyno appointment is for Thursday at 5pm.
11-14-2011
I'm not saying that Zoomer is always right but what he is saying makes sense. We will see.
I am still saying he isn't getting more than 330whp at the VERY most.
11-14-2011
If he makes 330 from what 29x? That's not bad dollar for dollar gains against an intercooler or a cam or much anything really. Plus it being one off and all... Hope his numbers add up, it's an interesting project.
11-14-2011
Ummmm no. Because he already has a XP cam. Look at the stock cam record and then rethink that.
Now if he put that TVS on a stock cam rockered car and made 330 whp that would be something but still not on the same level dollar for dollar as an intercooler and rockers.
11-14-2011
Hey let's compare numbers Made on e85 and race gas to 93 pump gas numbers thats a fun game!
11-14-2011
Are you saying the other records are not? Hmmmm lol
11-14-2011
The legit stock cam m90 record was DOHCz34 making 310whp SAE on 110 race gas.
11-14-2011
lol wut
he is back lol
11-14-2011
I wouldn't start with this numbers argument dude. Yes Kemp has the record but it has been challenged and so have your numbers.
Kemp- "I may dyno it one more time with EWP, slicks and open headers. Should pick up about 20-25 whp with those additions." Looks like that never happened or numbers didn't get posted.
All I am saying is what Zoomer said makes sense and you already have an XP cam. I am not saying 330 whp would be bad and that's still more than 10%.
Last edited by Pure2sin; 11-14-2011 at 11:22 PM.
11-14-2011
I don't see how anyone else's numbers are relevant... I'm going up against my own numbers. Just making sure you don't sway people with your skewed logic... Comparing STD corrected race gas/e85 numbers to my SAE corrected 93 octane numbers.
11-14-2011
First off:
1. DOHCZ34 w/ 318 WHP (I/C, G5 M-90, stock heads, 1.9 rockers, 9.4:1)[STD] ---109 Race gas. 18" chrome wheels.
Second I wasn't talking about your personal numbers. I was talking to the dude who was saying that 330whp on a TVS would be a good mod money wise compaired to a CAM or INTERCOOLER. He obviously didn't know you already have an XP cam. Unless you don't now? I was just using those record numbers as a reference. Unless you are recreating the wheel now?
I will watch what I say. I don't want you to post it up on the other forum. lol
Last edited by Pure2sin; 11-14-2011 at 11:39 PM.
11-14-2011
318 STD is about 10whp over what the SAE # would be
11-14-2011
Ok I agree with you. lol318 STD is about 10whp over what the SAE # would be
You can sleep well tonight.
11-14-2011
I sleep well regardless... I've been telling people for the better part of 2011 that the car is gonna make 350
11-14-2011
350...to the crank.
11-15-2011
A number you could only hope to hit some day
11-15-2011
Race gas and a 3.1 pulley would put me there no problem.
11-15-2011
Interested in what the fueling issue was. Did you run out of injector or was pump/fpr giving issues?
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Bookmarks |
Bookmarks |
