Thread: Wideband vs Air to fuel gauge

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 39
  1. #1 Wideband vs Air to fuel gauge 
    GTX Level Member asite57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,604
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    can someone please explain to me the difference between a wideband an a AFR gauge besides the price why should i spend an extra $170 for a wideband?
    SOLD. 99 GTP - Open Cone, ZZP STB ,GMPP Front & Rear Sway Bar, 3" DP & Cat-Back, Built Trans, 12'' Brakes, Tune
    http://www.grandprixforums.net/gtp-t...ack-67489.html
    04 SRT4 - Bone Stock....For Now
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: Wideband vs Air to fuel gauge 
    GXP Level Member Tuner-Extraordinaire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Out West
    Posts
    2,889
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Because afr gauge are worthless.

    Get a Wideband.
    Whine with your Cheese?
    Stock+Self Tuned. Going for low 14's everyday.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: Wideband vs Air to fuel gauge 
    GTX Level Member asite57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,604
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    but why they do the same thing all i need to know is if im running lean or rich to be more persice id just use my scanner ir a aeroforce
    SOLD. 99 GTP - Open Cone, ZZP STB ,GMPP Front & Rear Sway Bar, 3" DP & Cat-Back, Built Trans, 12'' Brakes, Tune
    http://www.grandprixforums.net/gtp-t...ack-67489.html
    04 SRT4 - Bone Stock....For Now
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: Wideband vs Air to fuel gauge 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    1,409
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    GT Level Member afallucco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    285
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by asite57 View Post
    but why they do the same thing all i need to know is if im running lean or rich to be more persice id just use my scanner ir a aeroforce
    There is a lot more too it than you just being lean or rich. You need a wideband to tune your maf properly and you cannot do it just by seeing if your car is lean or rich. Also you want a non intercooled car at an 11.5 afr at wot and an intercooled car at 12 afr. You would not be able to get exactly those numbers with you just seeing that it's either rich or lean.


    Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
    2004 Grand Prix GTP
    |FWI | HP Tuner | 1.9 Rockers | SD Headers | 3.5MPS | 97-03 control arms w/GMPP sway bar|
    Planned soon: s3x, custom ported heads, IC
    Quote Originally Posted by Slowpoke View Post
    Thug life, that's how we live.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: Wideband vs Air to fuel gauge 
    SE Level Member thenose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Athol, Massachusetts
    Posts
    115
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I have an AFR gauge in my 2000 and all I can tell from it is that my O2 sensor seems to have ADHD. Bounces around everywhere. Pretty useless even to see if you are running lean or rich, as it pretty much says both.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: Wideband vs Air to fuel gauge 
    GXP Level Member txslow6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,652
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    AFR gauge is useless on a fuel injected car.
    85 Corvette
    01 TA
    03 Z06
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: Wideband vs Air to fuel gauge 
    Turbo is the way to go. Fivefingerdeathpunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    21,022
    Thanks (Received)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    45
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by thenose View Post
    I have an AFR gauge in my 2000 and all I can tell from it is that my O2 sensor seems to have ADHD. Bounces around everywhere. Pretty useless even to see if you are running lean or rich, as it pretty much says both.

    A o2 sensor is suppose to bounce back and forth very quickly.

    SMGPFC Member #1
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: Wideband vs Air to fuel gauge 
    GXP Level Member Tuner-Extraordinaire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Out West
    Posts
    2,889
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by afallucco View Post
    There is a lot more too it than you just being lean or rich. You need a wideband to tune your maf properly and you cannot do it just by seeing if your car is lean or rich. Also you want a non intercooled car at an 11.5 afr at wot and an intercooled car at 12 afr. You would not be able to get exactly those numbers with you just seeing that it's either rich or lean.


    Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
    Not that simple unless you have heads.

    Our motors seem to like 10.7-11.3 AFR non intercooled, non cammed, and on the leaner end of that if you have rockers.
    Cammed and or intercooled 11.3-11.7 AFR. Heads allow you to lean out a tad however.


    Back on topic however, Stock Narrowband sensors have switch points when your car is running in closed loop. Run an open loop tune and you won't see the switching (ADHD)
    Whine with your Cheese?
    Stock+Self Tuned. Going for low 14's everyday.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: Wideband vs Air to fuel gauge 
    Florida Tuner Z34Phoenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    873
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    to OP
    an air fuel gauge will just read the narrow band.

    the diff between narrow band and Wide band are that the Narrow is tuned to see if the exhaust is richer then 14.7 or leaner only. a wide band will tell you exactly your air fuel from 10-20

    96 Z34 (RIP LQ1 14.81@92.3) L36 Swap 14.9@91.5 www.cardomain.com/id/z34phoenix
    Topswap: P&P All,Si Valves,L76's,LW Pushrods,SD's,DHP PT PB 13.91@99.8
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: Wideband vs Air to fuel gauge 
    I live here. stealthee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    SWPA
    Posts
    8,782
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    If you can't afford a wideband, you can't afford to mod.


    2011 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS - DD mode
    1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT - Many mods to come
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: Wideband vs Air to fuel gauge 
    GXP Level Member Tuner-Extraordinaire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Out West
    Posts
    2,889
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by stealthee View Post
    If you can't afford a wideband, you can't afford to mod.
    This.
    Whine with your Cheese?
    Stock+Self Tuned. Going for low 14's everyday.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: Wideband vs Air to fuel gauge 
    I live here. stealthee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    SWPA
    Posts
    8,782
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Seriously, a wideband can potentionally save you money. Take it from personal experience.


    2011 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS - DD mode
    1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT - Many mods to come
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: Wideband vs Air to fuel gauge 
    GXP Level Member darkhorizon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    flintnasty MI
    Posts
    2,596
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Stock Narrowband sensors have switch points when your car is running in closed loop. Run an open loop tune and you won't see the switching (ADHD)
    False.

    A narrowband switches very rapidly around the 14.7 point, so a car running in open loop that is running at 14.7 afr, will still cause a wideband to cycle normally. It will not be very consistant but it will still bounce around quite a bit.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: Wideband vs Air to fuel gauge 
    Perma-Banned! JK LOL Explicit_Spade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    7,921
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    The correct answer is the things you are refering to are both Air/Fuel Ratio gauges.
    One being a wideband, the other a narrowband.

    You want a wideband.
    Quote Originally Posted by W-Body Store
    Remember, GM engineers didn't take into account your need for speed.
    Daily Driver: 06 Grand Prix GT / 9.4:1 CR / IS3 Heads / Ported Gen V / ZZP Headers / HPT Pro / Pulleys: 4.25, 3.8, 3.5, 3.4, 3.2, 3.0, 2.9, 2.7
    Projects: 86 Monte Carlo SS / 98 Sonoma / 74 Honda CB750
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16  
    Your ClubGP Liason copgtp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Orange County, NY
    Posts
    1,101
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Just keep in mind that $170 is just for the gauge, sensor and wiring. You will need to have the sensor installed in your exhaust, right past the down pipe.

    This post brought to you by.....
    For all your 3800 needs:
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: Wideband vs Air to fuel gauge 
    GTX Level Member asite57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,604
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    well id get the wide band ad on kit for the scan gauge i want but ok
    SOLD. 99 GTP - Open Cone, ZZP STB ,GMPP Front & Rear Sway Bar, 3" DP & Cat-Back, Built Trans, 12'' Brakes, Tune
    http://www.grandprixforums.net/gtp-t...ack-67489.html
    04 SRT4 - Bone Stock....For Now
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: Wideband vs Air to fuel gauge 
    GXP Level Member Tuner-Extraordinaire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Out West
    Posts
    2,889
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    get a seperate wideband.
    Whine with your Cheese?
    Stock+Self Tuned. Going for low 14's everyday.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19 Re: Wideband vs Air to fuel gauge 
    Perma-Banned! JK LOL Explicit_Spade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    7,921
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by asite57 View Post
    well id get the wide band ad on kit for the scan gauge i want but ok
    Instead of that, as nixon said, you should run a stand alone wideband, not one that goes to a scangauge.
    Quote Originally Posted by W-Body Store
    Remember, GM engineers didn't take into account your need for speed.
    Daily Driver: 06 Grand Prix GT / 9.4:1 CR / IS3 Heads / Ported Gen V / ZZP Headers / HPT Pro / Pulleys: 4.25, 3.8, 3.5, 3.4, 3.2, 3.0, 2.9, 2.7
    Projects: 86 Monte Carlo SS / 98 Sonoma / 74 Honda CB750
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20 Re: Wideband vs Air to fuel gauge 
    GTX Level Member asite57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,604
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    alright thanks for the advice im pretty sure im just gonna get a regular air to fuel gauge but i have a scan tool that can give me an exact number of my AFR
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •