Thread: Non ethanol fuel

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22
  1. #1 Non ethanol fuel 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    27
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Hey people, long time no post...........k for some reason this won't let me do paragraphs? Anywho, been reading up about non ethanol fuel and how it supposedly gives you better mileage. On my way home from work, I filled up with some 89 non ethanol fuel. My car is an 02 GP GT 3.8 N/A BTW. It's never seen non ethanol fuel until now but it was only recently it sparked my curious side Car runs exactly the same, doesn't "feel" any different whatsoever than it has before. I expect this to take a full tank or 2 before I start seeing any difference to be rid of any remaining ethanol in the system. I'll keep everyone interested in this updated with mileage differences, if and when the car starts to feel different for better or worse. I don't have my hopes too high because it is 89 octane instead of it's usual 87 so maybe I won't see anything. Stay tuned
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: Non ethanol fuel 
    Perma-Banned! JK LOL Explicit_Spade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    7,921
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    You will see an increase in mileage of 2-3 mpgs due to the consumption properties of ethanol.
    Quote Originally Posted by W-Body Store
    Remember, GM engineers didn't take into account your need for speed.
    Daily Driver: 06 Grand Prix GT / 9.4:1 CR / IS3 Heads / Ported Gen V / ZZP Headers / HPT Pro / Pulleys: 4.25, 3.8, 3.5, 3.4, 3.2, 3.0, 2.9, 2.7
    Projects: 86 Monte Carlo SS / 98 Sonoma / 74 Honda CB750
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: Non ethanol fuel 
    GT Level Member addzradd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Cleveland
    Posts
    396
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    You won't see any significant change most likly, your car doesen't know the difference netweem the two. and at best there is only a 1.3% difference in energy contant between pure gas and e10 so say going from 28 to 28.3 mpg's maybe if you tuned for it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: Non ethanol fuel 
    Perma-Banned! JK LOL Explicit_Spade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    7,921
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by addzradd View Post
    You won't see any significant change most likly, your car doesen't know the difference netweem the two. and at best there is only a 1.3% difference in energy contant between pure gas and e10 so say going from 28 to 28.3 mpg's maybe if you tuned for it.
    Your car doesn't know the difference, correct. But if you look at people who have done real world testing mpgs increase fairly significantly when using non ethanol fuels. Try it yourself and get back to me.
    Quote Originally Posted by W-Body Store
    Remember, GM engineers didn't take into account your need for speed.
    Daily Driver: 06 Grand Prix GT / 9.4:1 CR / IS3 Heads / Ported Gen V / ZZP Headers / HPT Pro / Pulleys: 4.25, 3.8, 3.5, 3.4, 3.2, 3.0, 2.9, 2.7
    Projects: 86 Monte Carlo SS / 98 Sonoma / 74 Honda CB750
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: Non ethanol fuel 
    GTP Level Member LeadfootCJ7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    672
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Explicit_Spade View Post
    Your car doesn't know the difference, correct. But if you look at people who have done real world testing mpgs increase fairly significantly when using non ethanol fuels. Try it yourself and get back to me.
    Yep, even in the science, there is a greater loss that 1.3%. I know people like ethanol in certain applications, but it has less btu than gasoline. My wifes 02 Z28 lost a solid 4-5 mpg from it. My Mom's Deville lost 4-5 mpg. There were stations where we could get non ethanol fuel around TX. We would fill up on a road trip and that next tank would be back to regular mileage so it wasn't other changes in the cars condition. My 94 Olds Cutlass with the 3100 only lost about 1 mpg. Results may vary, but ethanol in the fuel does make a significant difference in mileage.
    2007 Grand Prix GXP;2002 Camaro Z28 - tune, CAI, and exhaust
    2006 GMC 2500HD - ATS high flow manifolds and uppipes, turbo back exhaust, blocked EGR, Denali headlights, Reflexxion Cown Hood
    1994 Olds Cutlass Supreme 2 door
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: Non ethanol fuel 
    Turbo is the way to go. Fivefingerdeathpunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    21,030
    Thanks (Received)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    45
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I still get 30-32 freeway with 93 E10, car gives no cares.

    SMGPFC Member #1
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: Non ethanol fuel 
    youtu.be/xhrBDcQq2DM FoSHO99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maquoketa, Iowa
    Posts
    2,943
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 1filthygp View Post
    Hey people, long time no post...........k for some reason this won't let me do paragraphs? :
    Your profile settings for message interface was set to "advanced" interface, switched it back to standard and it should work fine now.
    2001 GTP PT61 Turbo, E85, Stock Motor
    2011 Chevy Cruze MT6 1.4L Turbo
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: Non ethanol fuel 
    GT Level Member addzradd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Cleveland
    Posts
    396
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Have tried this because I heard it was super great for milage but in the end the first tank looked good with a 1.5 mpg increase but it was just a change in my driving habit trying to make it look good, once I went back to normal driving around my 3d tankful it went back to normal.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: Non ethanol fuel 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    27
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by addzradd View Post
    You won't see any significant change most likly, your car doesen't know the difference netweem the two. and at best there is only a 1.3% difference in energy contant between pure gas and e10 so say going from 28 to 28.3 mpg's maybe if you tuned for it.
    Car is bone stock down to the air filter.

    Quote Originally Posted by FoSHO99 View Post
    Your profile settings for message interface was set to "advanced" interface, switched it back to standard and it should work fine now.
    Cool thanks.

    On a personal note, this isn't going to be scientific by any means, just the good old miles divided by gallons pumped.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: Non ethanol fuel 
    GTP Level Member 231FUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ontario,Canada
    Posts
    861
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I get better mileage running shell v power 91 that has no ethanol in it than any other e10 premium fuel.
    But I'd rather run the Sunoco 94 for the extra octane myself, I care not about getting a little better fuel economy.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: Non ethanol fuel 
    Former GP Owner Chadgervais's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Bangor, ME
    Posts
    245
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 231FUN View Post
    I get better mileage running shell v power 91 that has no ethanol in it than any other e10 premium fuel.
    But I'd rather run the Sunoco 94 for the extra octane myself, I care not about getting a little better fuel economy.

    Is all Shell V-Power 91 E-free?
    FORMER GRAND PRIX OWNER- NO LONGER ACTIVE ON GRANPRIXFORUMS.NET
    YOU MAY PM ME WITH QUESTIONS, WILL ANSWER TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY
    FORMER RIDE: 2004 GT2, TRADED WITH 244,338 MILES. CURRENT: 2012 DODGE AVENGER
    GOD BLESS...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: Non ethanol fuel 
    GTP Level Member 231FUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ontario,Canada
    Posts
    861
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Chadgervais View Post
    Is all Shell V-Power 91 E-free?
    Yes, the v power shell fuel has NO ethanol added.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: Non ethanol fuel 
    pssssshhhhhhtt Jomamma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Howell, NJ
    Posts
    1,508
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 231FUN View Post
    Yes, the v power shell fuel has NO ethanol added.
    Ill have to go to the shell by me and check that out.

    It might be different by area.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: Non ethanol fuel 
    Former GP Owner Chadgervais's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Bangor, ME
    Posts
    245
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 231FUN View Post
    Yes, the v power shell fuel has NO ethanol added.

    Im just curious how that works. I used to manage a Shell station, our delivery invoices indicated that the gas came from an Irving terminal (NE/Canada supplier) with Shell additives added. All Irving 91 sold in Maine is E10, therefore that Shell, and all the others in my area would be selling E10 91 which does carry the V-Power marque here. I cannot find any literature online to support Shell VP being E free, where did you find that information? Is Shell ok with suppliers selling VPower with E10?

    Maine is kinda weird when it comes to gas distribution. ExxonMobil pulled out a few years ago leaving only Irving to supply the state. We can get only 87 and 91, 93 is not available in the Northern region of Maine as the NH/MA distributors will only truck it in if more than 10,000 gallons are ordered. The store I managed is owned by one of Maine's largest distributors who owns and or services 150+ stations in ME/NH/VT. Even when I was managing the Shell, from time to time I would receive a partial load branded for Citgo or Gulf, or even straight Irving. That must violate some kind of quality agreement.


    So here, no matter what brand of gas is on the sign, Irving is what you get, plus additive packages.
    FORMER GRAND PRIX OWNER- NO LONGER ACTIVE ON GRANPRIXFORUMS.NET
    YOU MAY PM ME WITH QUESTIONS, WILL ANSWER TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY
    FORMER RIDE: 2004 GT2, TRADED WITH 244,338 MILES. CURRENT: 2012 DODGE AVENGER
    GOD BLESS...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: Non ethanol fuel 
    GTP Level Member 231FUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ontario,Canada
    Posts
    861
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Chadgervais View Post
    Im just curious how that works. I used to manage a Shell station, our delivery invoices indicated that the gas came from an Irving terminal (NE/Canada supplier) with Shell additives added. All Irving 91 sold in Maine is E10, therefore that Shell, and all the others in my area would be selling E10 91 which does carry the V-Power marque here. I cannot find any literature online to support Shell VP being E free, where did you find that information? Is Shell ok with suppliers selling VPower with E10?

    Maine is kinda weird when it comes to gas distribution. ExxonMobil pulled out a few years ago leaving only Irving to supply the state. We can get only 87 and 91, 93 is not available in the Northern region of Maine as the NH/MA distributors will only truck it in if more than 10,000 gallons are ordered. The store I managed is owned by one of Maine's largest distributors who owns and or services 150+ stations in ME/NH/VT. Even when I was managing the Shell, from time to time I would receive a partial load branded for Citgo or Gulf, or even straight Irving. That must violate some kind of quality agreement.


    So here, no matter what brand of gas is on the sign, Irving is what you get, plus additive packages.
    That may be true, and they may be adding ethanol to it here now aswell but I do believe it does depend on your location.
    I did my mileage test between e10 94 and v power 91 back in summer before last and there was alot of discussion on this very topic on my local board at that time. I have to travel a ways out of Ontario and into Quebec to the north east before I see any Irving stations or suppliers. Our fuel in Southern Ontario is supplied out of Sarnia(chemical valley) where the Shell refinery is.
    Part that angers me is they want to add ethanol to everything but I can't get e85 without driving three hours or making a trip over the border.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: Non ethanol fuel 
    GrandPrix Junkie Sandman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Tallahassee, FL
    Posts
    3,538
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Chadgervais View Post
    Is all Shell V-Power 91 E-free?
    Quote Originally Posted by 231FUN View Post
    Yes, the v power shell fuel has NO ethanol added.
    Maybe in your area. We used to have nonethanol gas around here but it's all E10 now, doesn't matter company or octane.
    05 Saab 9-2X Linear (Saabaru)
    77 Morris Garage B
    Quote Originally Posted by TLSheff View Post
    You said "I'm done with it"... car says "Oh, really? *trollface*"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: Non ethanol fuel 
    GTP Level Member LeadfootCJ7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    672
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Where ever it is required, the Ethanol is added. There are very few exceptions. I believe there are less than a dozen stations in the entire state of Tx with no ethanol and they are in remorte, rural counties. Most pumps have a sticker on them that tells you if there is 10% ethanol.
    2007 Grand Prix GXP;2002 Camaro Z28 - tune, CAI, and exhaust
    2006 GMC 2500HD - ATS high flow manifolds and uppipes, turbo back exhaust, blocked EGR, Denali headlights, Reflexxion Cown Hood
    1994 Olds Cutlass Supreme 2 door
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: Non ethanol fuel 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    27
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Ok first run through. Just as I thought, nothing changed. 19.83mpg I did a lot of grinding around town over the weekend so that pretty much screwed the pooch for mileage. Being it the work week now I should see some improvement. My drive is 70 miles of nothing but flat farm country round trip. So we'll see how this week pans out. If I see anything better than 22 I'll keep on using non ethanol if not, back to the good ol 87 E10.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19 Re: Non ethanol fuel 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    27
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I got fired tonight, so no more buying fuel for awhile. Yea change huh Obama? what change? f****in liar.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20 Re: Non ethanol fuel 
    Turbo is the way to go. Fivefingerdeathpunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    21,030
    Thanks (Received)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    45
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Yes, blame the President for you being fired.

    SMGPFC Member #1
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Safe to run 90 octane with 10% ethanol in my 3.8 N/A?
    By burgundybullet in forum 3.8L V6 Naturally Aspirated (L36)(L26)
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 11-22-2012, 04:25 PM
  2. sluggish / misses / dies / did tune up w fuel injection / did fuel filter / car runs
    By dlc723e in forum 3.8L V6 Naturally Aspirated (L36)(L26)
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-30-2012, 08:25 PM
  3. possibly converting to ethanol
    By Poil336 in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 05-24-2012, 05:18 PM
  4. 94 Octane w/ 10% ethanol?
    By 2007gpgt in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 08-06-2011, 04:26 PM
  5. Ethanol injection
    By IndeedSS in forum Off Topic Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-03-2008, 09:45 AM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •