Dam, I was so close on the torque.
|
|
10-06-2012
Dam, I was so close on the torque.
10-06-2012
More mods now?
10-06-2012
Should've cammed. Not bad though. Still makes for a very fun ride.
10-06-2012
Yeah, shes quick. But I am leaving to basic training in a month so no more mods. Then maybe a cam after a while. But I am getting a Z06 when I get a house/garage.
Sent from my Droid
10-06-2012
Totally agree.....Hence why I was just talked into going to the ST2 Turbo cam instead of rockers....I won't mention names or anything but I was pressured into it.Originally Posted by hitman92499
If E85 is in your area and you wanted to go with a simple SIX or XP cam you could end up with something like this.
http://i1059.photobucket.com/albums/...k99GTP/001.jpg
10-06-2012
This guy said to cam.
10-06-2012
I did hit 360/400 on the 2-3 shift though!
Sent from my Droid
10-06-2012
I was thinkin at least somewhere around 300whp considering that one guy on here with the Bonneville SSIE puttin 303whp i think with similar mods to yours.But oh well decent numbers i guess.
10-18-2012
Also just found out those numbers were uncorrected for altitude... So I am for sure over 300WHP. I am in dener ~5500ft, I will try and get some dyno graphs up soon.
10-26-2012
wasn't aware altitude affected boosted cars much. i thought that being in a higher altitude you would be able to run a smaller pulley compared to being at sea level, which would even things out?
10-26-2012
Nope, both boosted applications are still affected, just not as much as n/a. N/A correction factor is around 23%. Turbo is around 14% and supercharged is around 12%
Sent from my Droid
10-26-2012
Breaking 300 whp on a stock cam is VERY difficult.
Also factor in sae vs std and happy go lucky dynos. Essentially numbers are only comparable from the same dyno and operator.
10-26-2012
Well according to this dyno/operator i did break 300whp. Dynojet dyno.
Sent from my Droid
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Tags for this Thread |
| Bookmarks |
Bookmarks |
