Thread: 3.8 vs. 5.3 (Rep)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 32

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1 3.8 vs. 5.3 (Rep) 
    SE Level Member nathangartz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Milwaukee
    Posts
    31
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    So as we all are well aware, the 3.8L engine in all our GT and GTP's from 97-03 were great engines. At least, I think I can speak for everyone on that topic. If you've ever sold a GP, or any GM with a 3.8, you've probably stated to the prospect that the engine was one of GM's more solid engines (cough 3.4!)

    While I wait for a few people to come over to buy my 97 GT and my 2000 GTP, I wonder if I should be buying the GXP. I haven't really done the research about the 5.3 and I am just wondering what you guys think. Is it as stable and reliable as the 3.8? Will it ever be as reputable as the 3.8? My father works at an auto auction (been a mechanic for 30 years now too) and knows his stuff; however, he hasn't really heard too much about the 5.3 besides the fact that the dealers at the auction expressed some concern about the aluminum block.

    How about the trans? Is that the weak spot?

    Just looking for some feedback before the light turns green on my sales for my two cars...and I am stuck with no transportation until I pick up my GXP...
     

  2. #2 Re: 3.8 vs. 5.3 (Rep) 
    GTX Level Member Panther427's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    colorado
    Posts
    602
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Hello. There is no doubt about how great the 3.8 is. Had several of them go to 300,000 miles. As for the GXP and the 5.3 LS4 it seems to be a great motor. The Water Pump is expensive when it goes out. It is different the the normal LSX motor's water pump to make it fit into the W-body plat form. And also the Serp belt looks to be a pain and there is some special tool for it. I havent read about any blown motors yet. There was some issue with guys using N2O bout a month ago with number 7 plugs. Biggest issue is finding performance parts designed for the motor. The trans is the weak spot in my mind. It seems hit or miss. Some people are nice and they have failed before 30K others run them hard and replace them around 100K. However the trans is updated with some better hard parts and with a little aftermarket /GMPP they should be pretty good.
     

  3. #3 Re: 3.8 vs. 5.3 (Rep) 
    GT Level Member massivesystem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    159
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by nathangartz View Post
    So as we all are well aware, the 3.8L engine in all our GT and GTP's from 97-03 were great engines. At least, I think I can speak for everyone on that topic. If you've ever sold a GP, or any GM with a 3.8, you've probably stated to the prospect that the engine was one of GM's more solid engines (cough 3.4!)

    While I wait for a few people to come over to buy my 97 GT and my 2000 GTP, I wonder if I should be buying the GXP. I haven't really done the research about the 5.3 and I am just wondering what you guys think. Is it as stable and reliable as the 3.8? Will it ever be as reputable as the 3.8? My father works at an auto auction (been a mechanic for 30 years now too) and knows his stuff; however, he hasn't really heard too much about the 5.3 besides the fact that the dealers at the auction expressed some concern about the aluminum block.

    How about the trans? Is that the weak spot?

    Just looking for some feedback before the light turns green on my sales for my two cars...and I am stuck with no transportation until I pick up my GXP...
    It al depends on what your looking for out of a car. I have a Modded 07 Sc GP GT and take GXP for walks all the time, in my opion they are pretty slow.
    2007 Pontiac Grand Prix GT Series III 3.8 Super Charged

    AL 104's Plugs, 180* T-Stat, Tuned PCM , Custom CAI is complete and installed, AeroForce Interceptor gauge, Smoothflow 3.5 pulley with 0* KR, SSAC SS Headers. 6000K HID
     

  4. #4 Re: 3.8 vs. 5.3 (Rep) 
    SE Level Member bladerunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    83
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by massivesystem View Post
    It al depends on what your looking for out of a car. I have a Modded 07 Sc GP GT and take GXP for walks all the time, in my opion they are pretty slow.
    and were the GXP's modded as well or stock?
    2006 GXP, stock for now
     

  5. #5 Re: 3.8 vs. 5.3 (Rep) 
    GT Level Member massivesystem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    159
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bladerunner View Post
    and were the GXP's modded as well or stock?

    The stock ones I put to sleep with no problem at all. A few modded ones gave a little more of a run, but in the end no match for a modded SC GT.
    2007 Pontiac Grand Prix GT Series III 3.8 Super Charged

    AL 104's Plugs, 180* T-Stat, Tuned PCM , Custom CAI is complete and installed, AeroForce Interceptor gauge, Smoothflow 3.5 pulley with 0* KR, SSAC SS Headers. 6000K HID
     

  6. #6 Re: 3.8 vs. 5.3 (Rep) 
    SE Level Member bladerunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    83
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    ^^ Looks like i got my work cut out for me then hahahha! When i have my GXP modded up to what power im lookin for ill let you know when i cross a GTP :P Im going to TRY to hit 400 whp if i can.


    I have had my GXP for about 3-4 mo now...glad i got this over a g35 or a IS250. Much happier with this faster choice.
    2006 GXP, stock for now
     

  7. #7 Re: 3.8 vs. 5.3 (Rep) 
    GrandPrix Junkie Sabrewings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Barksdale AFB, LA
    Posts
    4,879
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    We've seen a lot of LS4 issues over on NAIOA. One weird issue is the belt tensioner keeps breaking and that requires dropping the engine and cradle to get to.

    Not to say it's more problematic than the 3800, but it does have its own set of quirks.
    2004 Impala LS - got some mods sold!!!
    2009 Subaru Impreza WRX STI

    NAIOA moderator Still Imp'n, just in a different Imp.
     

  8. #8 Re: 3.8 vs. 5.3 (Rep) 
    SE Level Member bladerunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    83
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    well I hope my list of mods can smoke one. Im not lookin to be the fastest or i would have bought an sti for 2k less lol. once my mod list is done ill run one at a track see how i do! Ill be doing cams as well, not sure how many LS4s are cammed out there lol
    2006 GXP, stock for now
     

  9. #9 Re: 3.8 vs. 5.3 (Rep) 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Cams? It is a pushrod motor just like the 3800. CAM, as in one

    LS4's aren't good modding motors IMO...the transmission doesn't like to be raped on and the intake side of the motor is very restrictive. IF I were to get another car that is powered by the L67 or L32, I'd spring for a '01 GTP OR a '04 Comp G GTP. With the right mods, no matter what you do to a GXP/SS or anything with the LS4, it is gonna get beat by the supercharged motor for the most part. What I DO like about the LS4 is the exhaust note and the crazy V8 low end torque. IF my 3800 sounded like a GXP...I'd keep it forever
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
     

  10. #10 Re: 3.8 vs. 5.3 (Rep) 
    GTX Level Member Panther427's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    colorado
    Posts
    602
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Personally it came i love the SC 3800's but i got a good deal on a used 2008 GXP, Had good power, warenty, and one thing a 3800 will never a V8 Rumble. Not everyone wants the fastest car i know GASP... haha. But for a UNIQUE car the GXP is a great family car. Less than 16K built in four years. Again i love the 3800/GTP/Comp-G's but they are not exactaly rare. That is one thing that to me makes me love my car. Also Go fast parts are cheaper for the 3800 but as far as the GXP goes you get 12.7" rotors, 18" wheels, Bilstien shocks.(part of the FE4 package) All this adds up to a great base of parts that with a good stock power level make a great DD, and a decent platform to add some power(just not cheap)
    Last edited by Panther427; 07-01-2009 at 11:00 AM.
     

  11. #11 Re: 3.8 vs. 5.3 (Rep) 
    SE Level Member bladerunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    83
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Panther427 View Post
    Personally it came i love the SC 3800's but i got a good deal on a used 2008 GXP, Had good power, warenty, and one thing a 3800 will never a V6 Rumble. Not everyone wants the fastest car i know GASP... haha. But for a UNIQUE car the GXP is a great family car. Less than 16K built in four years. Again i love the 3800/GTP/Comp-G's but they are not exactaly rare. That is one thing that to me makes me love my car. Also Go fast parts are cheaper for the 3800 but as far as the GXP goes you get 12.7" rotors, 18" wheels, Bilstien shocks.(part of the FE4 package) All this adds up to a great base of parts that with a good stock power level make a great DD, and a decent platform to add some power(just not cheap)


    VERY well put my friend. I owe you a beer
    2006 GXP, stock for now
     

  12. #12 Re: 3.8 vs. 5.3 (Rep) 
    SE Level Member nathangartz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Milwaukee
    Posts
    31
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    thanks for all the replies.

    Not really interested in doing any modding so I don't have to worry about that. Just want that V8 rumble and a good looking family car.

    Mainly interested in what you all have seen as far as common problems.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sabrewings View Post
    One weird issue is the belt tensioner keeps breaking and that requires dropping the engine and cradle to get to.
    Sabrewings, thanks for bringing that up! That sucks big time! Any aftermarket replacements that work better? Is it the tensioner itself, the arm, or a weak point somewhere else?
     

  13. #13 Re: 3.8 vs. 5.3 (Rep) 
    GrandPrix Junkie Sabrewings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Barksdale AFB, LA
    Posts
    4,879
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I don't know about replacements. Everyone I know of had it done under warranty so I don't think anyone has looked into it.
    2004 Impala LS - got some mods sold!!!
    2009 Subaru Impreza WRX STI

    NAIOA moderator Still Imp'n, just in a different Imp.
     

  14. #14 Re: 3.8 vs. 5.3 (Rep) 
    GTX Level Member Panther427's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    colorado
    Posts
    602
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I havent herd of that on the GP cars. Some issues with water with the sun roofs. Some people wear out the brakes quickly.
     

  15. #15 Re: 3.8 vs. 5.3 (Rep) 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Panther427 View Post
    I havent herd of that on the GP cars. Some issues with water with the sun roofs. Some people wear out the brakes quickly.
    Massive Cross Drilled and slotted rotors will do that from the factory I wish the '97-'03 GP had good brakes...or at least the 12 inchers like the Monte or Impala...
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
     

  16. #16 Re: 3.8 vs. 5.3 (Rep) 
    GTX Level Member Panther427's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    colorado
    Posts
    602
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bluegtp91 View Post
    Massive Cross Drilled and slotted rotors will do that from the factory I wish the '97-'03 GP had good brakes...or at least the 12 inchers like the Monte or Impala...
    For sure, to me i dont consider that an issue, but it sure makes some people angry. I have always been hard on brakes so to me its the price of having performance breaks. But on the other side of the coin, i dont think the breaks wear out that bad for most people, and i havent had to replace mine yet. Good brakes and good tires are the best safety devices u can have on your car.
     

  17. #17 Re: 3.8 vs. 5.3 (Rep) 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    8
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by nathangartz View Post
    So as we all are well aware, the 3.8L engine in all our GT and GTP's from 97-03 were great engines. At least, I think I can speak for everyone on that topic. If you've ever sold a GP, or any GM with a 3.8, you've probably stated to the prospect that the engine was one of GM's more solid engines (cough 3.4!)

    While I wait for a few people to come over to buy my 97 GT and my 2000 GTP, I wonder if I should be buying the GXP. I haven't really done the research about the 5.3 and I am just wondering what you guys think. Is it as stable and reliable as the 3.8? Will it ever be as reputable as the 3.8? My father works at an auto auction (been a mechanic for 30 years now too) and knows his stuff; however, he hasn't really heard too much about the 5.3 besides the fact that the dealers at the auction expressed some concern about the aluminum block.

    How about the trans? Is that the weak spot?

    Just looking for some feedback before the light turns green on my sales for my two cars...and I am stuck with no transportation until I pick up my GXP...
    Umm GXP All The Way Dude But Seriously if your gonna waste that much coin get a G8 I Love my 2006 GXP but I wish I would have Waited, Plus Pontiac is in the trash in GM's Mind so Why Waste the Money on **** that GM did'nt care enough about Buick in my opinion should hve been cut not there Iconic Car Brand like Pontiac, But who am I a GM guy Disapointed well im off Ford looks Promiseing J/k
     

  18. #18 Re: 3.8 vs. 5.3 (Rep) 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    8
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Plus most GXP MOD Bashers Can't Afford one so they wil never know an they are RARE they will be lucky to Race one with a driver that has the balls to make the GXP move, Too much Supercharged BS on this site, most have probly raced the guy that dosen't have the motor but has Emblems from Ebay People ar stupid sometimes
     

  19. #19 Re: 3.8 vs. 5.3 (Rep) 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SJR GXP View Post
    Plus most GXP MOD Bashers Can't Afford one so they wil never know an they are RARE they will be lucky to Race one with a driver that has the balls to make the GXP move, Too much Supercharged BS on this site, most have probly raced the guy that dosen't have the motor but has Emblems from Ebay People ar stupid sometimes
    Really? Get off your high horse. The GXP is a turd compared to modded GTP's. Reason being no one mods them is because there is NOTHING THERE FOR IT besides a few bolt-ons. I LOL'ed at the "affording" part too. Just becuase I didn't buy a GXP Grand Prix, doesn't mean I couldn't have afforded one. Reason I didn't buy one is because of the lack of aftermarket support in the first place. Isn't it funny how even the TURBO V8 GXP can't even muster an 11 second 1/4 but a bolt-on turbo 3800 V6 will throw down 11's all day? Oh, and it does it for about half the price.

    And for the supercharged BS...then don't come around since most EVERY Grand Prix on here is Supercharged. And I have raced PLENTY of GXP's, Monte Carlo SS', Impala SS'...and they get walked...and not by car lengths, but by bus lengths. I'll gladly take the trip to Denver to video tape a race between us. Show you have awesome your rare car is. Oh...and what have you done to your GXP? Intake, Cutout, Exhaust, MAF? Guess what. Still nothing great. All the other GXP guys on here are cool to all the other GP owners...why do you have to bash everyone that doesn't have a GXP?
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
     

  20. #20 Re: 3.8 vs. 5.3 (Rep) 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    8
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bluegtp91 View Post
    Really? Get off your high horse. The GXP is a turd compared to modded GTP's. Reason being no one mods them is because there is NOTHING THERE FOR IT besides a few bolt-ons. I LOL'ed at the "affording" part too. Just becuase I didn't buy a GXP Grand Prix, doesn't mean I couldn't have afforded one. Reason I didn't buy one is because of the lack of aftermarket support in the first place. Isn't it funny how even the TURBO V8 GXP can't even muster an 11 second 1/4 but a bolt-on turbo 3800 V6 will throw down 11's all day? Oh, and it does it for about half the price.

    And for the supercharged BS...then don't come around since most EVERY Grand Prix on here is Supercharged. And I have raced PLENTY of GXP's, Monte Carlo SS', Impala SS'...and they get walked...and not by car lengths, but by bus lengths. I'll gladly take the trip to Denver to video tape a race between us. Show you have awesome your rare car is. Oh...and what have you done to your GXP? Intake, Cutout, Exhaust, MAF? Guess what. Still nothing great. All the other GXP guys on here are cool to all the other GP owners...why do you have to bash everyone that doesn't have a GXP?
    Just Bring it, I AM AT Bandimere Speedway's 5,860-foot elevation every week at test and tunes, We love destroying outta towners all the time Oh and which one you wanna race My Gxp with just Intake/ Magnaflow Exhaust and a superchips Flash Paq or the 2002 GTP that is highly Moded as yours and sucks Compared to my GXP Trust me got both and I Got Know which is better by Experiance, Under the hood and in the driver seat
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Tags for this Thread
rep

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •