Thread: intense cams

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 34
  1. #1 intense cams 
    GT Level Member bad1999gtp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    eau claire, wisconsin
    Posts
    122
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    ok so i was looking a the intense site cause i am gting a cam was going to get the xp but i saw the stage 1x cam on intense anyone ever run this cam or running it now is it better then the xp or worse or whats the word?
    ported m90,ported lower,160 tstat,headers,3in dp,cat&resi delete,flowmaster 44's,103's,zzp ic,42.5 inj,N*,3.4 pulley,cust. pcm,ported heads,cai,drilled&slotted rotors,gmpp sway bars
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: intense cams 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    83
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bad1999gtp View Post
    ok so i was looking a the intense site cause i am gting a cam was going to get the xp but i saw the stage 1x cam on intense anyone ever run this cam or running it now is it better then the xp or worse or whats the word?
    Their really about even. The xp is slightly larger but i have friends that have ran both and they love them. Its really just personal opinion or whichever you can get cheaper.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: intense cams 
    GT Level Member Meemperor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Toronto, ON, Canada
    Posts
    211
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Get an IS3. It's a good time.
    Lumpy Gen 3
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: intense cams 
    I live here. UR LOSN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Rockford, IL
    Posts
    5,796
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    personal preference......
    2001 GTP- PT76 turbo, Intense Drag cars old engine, Stage 4 Intense turbo cam,FMIC,150 wet,Double roller timing chain,Diamond forged coated pistons 8:0:1,Diamond piston rings,Cryoed L32 connecting rods,Cryoed crank,Clevite77 main bearings,Clevite77 cam bearings,Clevite77 L32 rod bearings,ARP Everything, Intense/meizere true billet Flexplate,Intense Wilson UIM/LIM,Intense oil pressure kit,Cometic,OE-R lifters,Cryoed L67 block,ATI turbo dampner,80# inject,Weldon 2035 fp,Aero Fuel Rails,AL cradle
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: intense cams 
    GT Level Member shaferz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Forrest IL
    Posts
    155
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    S1x rox the socks of my car.

    99 GTP = 12.936 @ 112.12 2.16 60'
    06 TBSS = STOCK
    07 GXP = STOCK - ordering SSC's
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: intense cams 
    SS-DD Level Member IndeedSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    St Louis MO
    Posts
    1,900
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I've had both and believe I liked the S1X better. The S1x seems to respond better in the mid powerband range than the XP does. With my daily driver I'm rarely at the top end, where the XP comes alive. The XP has a way better exhaust note than the S1X IMO.

    It's all opinion though, and you will likely enjoy either one of those.
    04 Indy SS build #972 - Traded
    2010 Camaro SS LS3
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: intense cams 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    131
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I just did a survey on this, and the S1X looks better for the street. I can sum it up pretty easy, if you have the 2.93's get the S1X, 3.29's the XP...but it will also improve the S1X's powerband.

    It's a close call, but check this sample of car's back half 1/4 mile MPH sheet I made:
    MPH comparison from ronvogel -- Scan Depot dot net

    Updated list:
    Ronvogel08-01-11 18:43:54 from Ronvogel -- Scan Depot dot net
    Last edited by Ron Vogel; 01-11-2008 at 07:48 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: intense cams 
    GT Level Member shaferz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Forrest IL
    Posts
    155
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by IndeedSS View Post
    The XP has a way better exhaust note than the S1X IMO.

    eh?

    YouTube - shaferz GTP warm idle

    S1x

    99 GTP = 12.936 @ 112.12 2.16 60'
    06 TBSS = STOCK
    07 GXP = STOCK - ordering SSC's
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: intense cams 
    GT Level Member SD GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Kirkwood, Delaware
    Posts
    415
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I've talked to DuBob many times about cams when I was looking at camming my GTP. He told me he had been running an S1X for a while then switched to the XP. I think he more of a fan of the XP cam. After he had done quite a few installs of the VS cams (mine included ) he said he would have gone with the VS right off the bat.

    I haven't per se heard anything bad about the Intense cams. but, that's what I've heard in passing. I think most who are looking for a good cam for a daily from Intense go S1X.
    MACGP President
    3.25"/P&P Gen III/ZZP Stg II TB/Thasher CAI/ZZP VS Cam/TOG Xtremes/AL 104s/180*/Full 3" Exhaust/SD Package/GMPP Sways & Arms/DuBob'd
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: intense cams 
    SS-DD Level Member IndeedSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    St Louis MO
    Posts
    1,900
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by shaferz View Post
    I'll see you in Branson.
    04 Indy SS build #972 - Traded
    2010 Camaro SS LS3
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: intense cams 
    GT Level Member bad1999gtp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    eau claire, wisconsin
    Posts
    122
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    so i guess i should stick with the xp that i here? and just run stock rockers? till i can get a set of 1.6 rockers? well i appreciate the help you guys are givin just do not want to make a bad choice on the cam cause it will in there for awhile.
    ported m90,ported lower,160 tstat,headers,3in dp,cat&resi delete,flowmaster 44's,103's,zzp ic,42.5 inj,N*,3.4 pulley,cust. pcm,ported heads,cai,drilled&slotted rotors,gmpp sway bars
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: intense cams 
    SS-DD Level Member IndeedSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    St Louis MO
    Posts
    1,900
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bad1999gtp View Post
    so i guess i should stick with the xp that i here? and just run stock rockers? till i can get a set of 1.6 rockers? well i appreciate the help you guys are givin just do not want to make a bad choice on the cam cause it will in there for awhile.

    stock rockers are 1.6 or do you mean switching to 1.6. I'm running my stock rockers now and did with the S1X as well.
    04 Indy SS build #972 - Traded
    2010 Camaro SS LS3
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: intense cams 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    131
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Factory rockers after 1999 are 1.66 ratio. 96-98 rockers are 1.6
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: intense cams 
    SS-DD Level Member IndeedSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    St Louis MO
    Posts
    1,900
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Vogel View Post
    Factory rockers after 1999 are 1.66 ratio. 96-98 rockers are 1.6
    So the 1.6 rr ZZP sells are smaller ratio that most of us have stock. Good to know.
    04 Indy SS build #972 - Traded
    2010 Camaro SS LS3
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: intense cams 
    GT Level Member DuBob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Lititz, PA
    Posts
    242
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    The XP DEFINITELY has more power north of 5000rpms than the S1x, it was very noticeable. The XP also sounds super-sweet. I personally don't think that the S1x and XP are as close to one another as some claim.

    But the VS cam really impressed me with it's powerful mid-range compared to both the S1x and the XP. Like I've said before, if I had chosen the VS the first time, I would probably have stuck with it and just went I/C'd after that.
    One of the First: 2008 Liquid Red Pontiac G8 GT (hers)
    -Intake, Tune, Magnaflow Exhaust, 40% tint.
    -Next: Rims, lowered?, headers?

    One of the Last: 2009.5 Stryker Blue Metallic Pontiac G8 GXP M6 (mine)
    -Intake, Magnaflow Exhaust, 25% tint.
    -Next: Headers and tune.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: intense cams 
    GTP Level Member s1795so2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    alhambra, Il
    Posts
    1,125
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    stock mufflers sound awesome when you take the cat off the car on ours. Borla xspro's would be ftw though, I have to say.
    Steven Oliver
    2004 GTP comp-g WS6. Gator and suede all around interior.
    Advanced MECP certified installer, custom upholsterer.
    <img src=http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k87/s1795so2/random%20pics/manbike.jpg border=0 alt= />
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: intense cams 
    Transmission Expert Trannyman95's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Fort Wayne, IN
    Posts
    1,858
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    One of my local friends 97 GTP had a S1X with ported heads, intercooler, headers, gen V blower, N* tb, 3.29s..... Anyways the car ran low 12s on motor and lost a piston during a nitrous run last year so I rebuilt the engine and this time around used an XP cam that needed some loving care or was going in the trash. Long story short the bearing mains on the cam were groved up bad from the engine it originally came from out of a different car and we had to use custom size cam bearings and have the cam turned to use it. After driving the car several hundred miles he stood on it a few times and was shocked by the stronger topend pull. I rode in the car earlier this week while doing some idle tuning for the new cam and it really does pull a lot stronger over 5K rpm, and especially over 6K rpm. I always like the strong powerband of the S1X cam and felt it to be a tossup between the two cams but as Lee mentioned earlier as well as others the S1X has great all around power and the XP lacks a bit of low rpm light throttle power and more than offsets it up top if that is your priority. I have the XP cam in my rwd cutlass and it pulls very strong all around. Both cams work well with stock heads also, so this seems to be the line whether you run stock heads or modified heads.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: intense cams 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    131
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    1/4 mile times on average would probably favor the S1X unless you go for at least 3.29's and a stall. Car barely gets into 3rd with 2.93's at the 1/4, so you really want to capitalize the low and mid-range. One of the reasons I came up with my back half MPH list was to help me decide on what cam phasing I was going to use. The results brought me to the conclusion the car needed more grunt in the 3000-4500rpm range, so advancing either cam would be a good idea if clearances are checked properly.

    Remember, if using the Rollmaster, it was developed for the L36, so it may be retarded 2 degrees when installed straight up in an L67.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19 Re: intense cams 
    GT Level Member bad1999gtp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    eau claire, wisconsin
    Posts
    122
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    so the vs cam you guys are talkin about does that have good bottom end. i guess my main deal is that the car will only be raced every other weekend and i do not want to lose any bottom end
    Last edited by bad1999gtp; 01-11-2008 at 07:30 PM.
    ported m90,ported lower,160 tstat,headers,3in dp,cat&resi delete,flowmaster 44's,103's,zzp ic,42.5 inj,N*,3.4 pulley,cust. pcm,ported heads,cai,drilled&slotted rotors,gmpp sway bars
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20 Re: intense cams 
    GT Level Member Meemperor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Toronto, ON, Canada
    Posts
    211
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by IndeedSS View Post
    So the 1.6 rr ZZP sells are smaller ratio that most of us have stock. Good to know.

    Since they are aluminium they'll have no deflection and will make more power than a stock rocker with someone who is heavily modded.


    XP cam also like the turbo cars too
    Lumpy Gen 3
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Those with XP and VS cams step in
    By IndeedSS in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 01-09-2008, 01:13 PM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •