Thread: Nic or XP?

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 108
  1. #1 Nic or XP? 
    GXP Level Member Timing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    gardner,mass
    Posts
    2,142
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    So im ordering i cam this week and im looking for some opinions. I am ordering these parts new because i dont believe in ordering any valvetrain parts used, i just dont want to take that risk. What cam should i do? I am going with 140# springs, titanium retainers, double roller. Now i know people are going to say i dont need double roller or 140 springs but im not looking to cheap out. This is my dd and i dont want problems down the road. So what i am looking for opinions on are Nic or Xp? Should i bother with lifter? oe-r or Ls7 if i do? rods? 42.5# lucas or will ev1 42# be fine?
    Thanks for your opinions. Cant wait
    08 MazdaSpeed 3- Treadstone tr8l, Ebay Piping, Ported intake,Thermal gasket, Cs Injector Seals,Cobb intake/inlet, Autotech Internals, Poly mounts, Speed Daddy DP, Magnaflow CB,
    RPF1 17x9 255/45 Direzza Zll
    04 COMPG- Vs, getrag 284 RIP
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: Nic or XP? 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    XP cam with stock lifters, run 60# injectors, the 42s suck.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: Nic or XP? 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    maryland
    Posts
    1,508
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SnowFlake View Post
    XP cam with stock lifters, run 60# injectors, the 42s suck.
    This love my xp cam sound especially at idle IMO Xp cam FTW !!

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: Nic or XP? 
    GTP Level Member wa04compg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Puyallup WA
    Posts
    1,747
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Xp if you want to go intercooled...NIC if you don't want to
    04 Comp G - XP Bolt ons....boring Slow...SOLD
    08 G8 GT - exhaust Tune
    99 Silverado - 5.3 Exhaust Tune
    01 Suburban - 5.3 Intake Exhaust Tune
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: Nic or XP? 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by wa04compg View Post
    Xp if you want to go intercooled...NIC if you don't want to
    No.
    Just no.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: Nic or XP? 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    maryland
    Posts
    1,508
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Lol

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: Nic or XP? 
    GXP Level Member Timing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    gardner,mass
    Posts
    2,142
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SnowFlake View Post
    No.
    Just no.
    I heard much better gains from nic but i imagine you dont want to tune it :P or is there something else im unaware of and honestly idk if ima end up intercooling it anyway. Next thing after cam will be building a trans so i have one when this one blows up down the road. Then once i have the built trans throwing an intercooler on is pointless ill just go turbo at that point. So i want the most gains out of this but at the same time be safe. With the nic being so agressive and needed a really solid tune would it me more problimatic to run seeing i dd it in the winter? Also wont the 60# be way overkill until i plan on turbo? im not going to be running e85 just 93 and race gas on track days.
    08 MazdaSpeed 3- Treadstone tr8l, Ebay Piping, Ported intake,Thermal gasket, Cs Injector Seals,Cobb intake/inlet, Autotech Internals, Poly mounts, Speed Daddy DP, Magnaflow CB,
    RPF1 17x9 255/45 Direzza Zll
    04 COMPG- Vs, getrag 284 RIP
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: Nic or XP? 
    GTP Level Member wa04compg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Puyallup WA
    Posts
    1,747
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SnowFlake View Post
    No.
    Just no.
    Go ahead and give your opinion then
    04 Comp G - XP Bolt ons....boring Slow...SOLD
    08 G8 GT - exhaust Tune
    99 Silverado - 5.3 Exhaust Tune
    01 Suburban - 5.3 Intake Exhaust Tune
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: Nic or XP? 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by wa04compg View Post
    Go ahead and give your opinion then
    There isn't an opinion to give, the XP cam is better both intercooled and non intercooled. It makes more power, idles better, and will get better MPG.
    To read into the name of the cam means you're just falling for the marketing gimmick and aren't looking at the design itself.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ginseng View Post
    I heard much better gains from nic but i imagine you dont want to tune it :P or is there something else im unaware of and honestly idk if ima end up intercooling it anyway. Next thing after cam will be building a trans so i have one when this one blows up down the road. Then once i have the built trans throwing an intercooler on is pointless ill just go turbo at that point. So i want the most gains out of this but at the same time be safe. With the nic being so agressive and needed a really solid tune would it me more problimatic to run seeing i dd it in the winter? Also wont the 60# be way overkill until i plan on turbo? im not going to be running e85 just 93 and race gas on track days.
    The NIC isn't aggressive, it's just on a tighter LSA and lopes a bit more at idle. It is not any more or less difficult to tune, and it's name doesn't mean it makes power similar to other cams that also have an intercooler.
    The XP cam is the better cam.

    I made 291whp SAE (299 STD) on a dynojet with a 3.2 pulley, headers, and an XP cam non intercooled... on 93 octane.
    That same setup ran a 12.7 @ 108 on street tires.

    The 60s are so much better than the 42s. Not overkill at all.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: Nic or XP? 
    GXP Level Member Timing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    gardner,mass
    Posts
    2,142
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SnowFlake View Post
    There isn't an opinion to give, the XP cam is better both intercooled and non intercooled. It makes more power, idles better, and will get better MPG.
    To read into the name of the cam means you're just falling for the marketing gimmick and aren't looking at the design itself.



    The NIC isn't aggressive, it's just on a tighter LSA and lopes a bit more at idle. It is not any more or less difficult to tune, and it's name doesn't mean it makes power similar to other cams that also have an intercooler.
    The XP cam is the better cam.

    I made 291whp SAE (299 STD) on a dynojet with a 3.2 pulley, headers, and an XP cam non intercooled... on 93 octane.
    That same setup ran a 12.7 @ 108 on street tires.

    The 60s are so much better than the 42s. Not overkill at all.
    Thankyou sir well then im gonna hope for 300whp with the genv and a 12.5 just so i can beat you :P

    Also when do you prefer to tune this thing? I can have the cam in w/e but would you rather wait till summer or does it not matter. Im impatient so a cam sitting in my house for a few months is going to kill me :P
    08 MazdaSpeed 3- Treadstone tr8l, Ebay Piping, Ported intake,Thermal gasket, Cs Injector Seals,Cobb intake/inlet, Autotech Internals, Poly mounts, Speed Daddy DP, Magnaflow CB,
    RPF1 17x9 255/45 Direzza Zll
    04 COMPG- Vs, getrag 284 RIP
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: Nic or XP? 
    The Boss Iceman6669's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    7,488
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Received)
    38
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    An XP cam will make more power then the NIC cam. BUT you can still IC with the NIC cam and make good numbers also.
    97 GTP Sold-prolly rusted away by now
    2011 F-150 Yote powered
    Too Hot to Handle, Too Cold to Hold
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: Nic or XP? 
    GTP Level Member wa04compg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Puyallup WA
    Posts
    1,747
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SnowFlake View Post
    There isn't an opinion to give, the XP cam is better both intercooled and non intercooled. It makes more power, idles better, and will get better MPG.
    To read into the name of the cam means you're just falling for the marketing gimmick and aren't looking at the design itself.



    The NIC isn't aggressive, it's just on a tighter LSA and lopes a bit more at idle. It is not any more or less difficult to tune, and it's name doesn't mean it makes power similar to other cams that also have an intercooler.
    The XP cam is the better cam.

    I made 291whp SAE (299 STD) on a dynojet with a 3.2 pulley, headers, and an XP cam non intercooled... on 93 octane.
    That same setup ran a 12.7 @ 108 on street tires.

    The 60s are so much better than the 42s. Not overkill at all.
    ^this is what I was looking for instead of a a bunch of no's...I have seen people with NIC cam put down good numbers also but people that go xp generally go IC at some point most people with NIC don't IC and like the harsh idle and don't care about mpg...im not disagreeing that the xp puts down better numbers just was saying if he wants to IC at some point XP would be better
    04 Comp G - XP Bolt ons....boring Slow...SOLD
    08 G8 GT - exhaust Tune
    99 Silverado - 5.3 Exhaust Tune
    01 Suburban - 5.3 Intake Exhaust Tune
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: Nic or XP? 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    The XP is better without an intercooler.
    The XP is better with an intercooler.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: Nic or XP? 
    GTP Level Member wa04compg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Puyallup WA
    Posts
    1,747
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    lol
    04 Comp G - XP Bolt ons....boring Slow...SOLD
    08 G8 GT - exhaust Tune
    99 Silverado - 5.3 Exhaust Tune
    01 Suburban - 5.3 Intake Exhaust Tune
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: Nic or XP? 
    GXP Level Member Timing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    gardner,mass
    Posts
    2,142
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SnowFlake View Post
    The XP is better without an intercooler.
    The XP is better with an intercooler.
    Do you think i should go 125# springs or should i go with the 140#s, same price but would the 140# be more on the cam and chain for no reason? Also the fact that im using stock lifters i imagine the higher spring to more load on those aswell. I feel like if the came is good on the 125s then they would be a better bet for less wear.
    08 MazdaSpeed 3- Treadstone tr8l, Ebay Piping, Ported intake,Thermal gasket, Cs Injector Seals,Cobb intake/inlet, Autotech Internals, Poly mounts, Speed Daddy DP, Magnaflow CB,
    RPF1 17x9 255/45 Direzza Zll
    04 COMPG- Vs, getrag 284 RIP
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: Nic or XP? 
    GT Level Member chamberlain198437's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Grants Pass Oregon
    Posts
    167
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    And more on stock valves to

    Sent from my LG-L38C using Tapatalk 2
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: Nic or XP? 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Ginseng View Post
    Do you think i should go 125# springs or should i go with the 140#s, same price but would the 140# be more on the cam and chain for no reason? Also the fact that im using stock lifters i imagine the higher spring to more load on those aswell. I feel like if the came is good on the 125s then they would be a better bet for less wear.
    I'd run the 140s all day if I had the choice.
    They're both rated to .600 lift and the 140s are nitrided which means they'll last longer.
    And when they do lose seat pressure you're already 15lbs ahead.
    They'll control the valves much better and you'll be good to wind out the motor above 6k.

    Titanium valve springs are a good idea too. They'll save a few grams I'm sure. Look into having them cryo treated to prevent wear.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: Nic or XP? 
    Moderator dsmuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Coldwater, OH
    Posts
    15,758
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Don't bother getting 42.5 you'll need 60# to make sure you have the flow needed for your mods. I'm thinking i'll be out of injector on my ic setup
    98 GTP modded 1.9's, sd headers, 3.4", zzp 1.0 230K miles scrapped.
    04 Comp G zzp stb's, UMI ta's, Speedbuilt sways, bully flo heads, XP, zzp headers, fsic, thrasher shift kit, 60#, 2.6" corsa 2.5", Inferno hood
    01 gt z7 turbo tep trans zzp motor
    08 g8 gt cam exhaust 11.87@118
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19 Nic or XP? 
    GTX Level Member crbquist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    689
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Go with the xp... The NIC is overrated IMO. Regardless, any aftermarket cam is better than stock...
    01 Silvermist GTP - E85 - Cam - Heads - Phenolic IC - Polished Gen V - Stock trans...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20 Re: Nic or XP? 
    GXP Level Member Timing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    gardner,mass
    Posts
    2,142
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SnowFlake View Post
    I'd run the 140s all day if I had the choice.
    They're both rated to .600 lift and the 140s are nitrided which means they'll last longer.
    And when they do lose seat pressure you're already 15lbs ahead.
    They'll control the valves much better and you'll be good to wind out the motor above 6k.

    Titanium valve springs are a good idea too. They'll save a few grams I'm sure. Look into having them cryo treated to prevent wear.
    Perfect, makes sense. I might go the extra route when i install the cam to take the heads off and check my seats, clean up the valves and **** anyway, plus it will be easier to use a clamp style spring compressor to change over the springs anyway and i wont need a compressor to hold the valves up. I dont imagine ill have any issues after i put the heads back on. Are the stock gaskets metal or will i need new gaskets for them?
    Last edited by Timing; 02-09-2014 at 09:22 PM.
    08 MazdaSpeed 3- Treadstone tr8l, Ebay Piping, Ported intake,Thermal gasket, Cs Injector Seals,Cobb intake/inlet, Autotech Internals, Poly mounts, Speed Daddy DP, Magnaflow CB,
    RPF1 17x9 255/45 Direzza Zll
    04 COMPG- Vs, getrag 284 RIP
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •