Thread: max revs on stock bottom end?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 35

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1 max revs on stock bottom end? 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    80
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    hi guys,

    Im getting a XP hot cam installed soon with all the goodies....pretty sure that cam makes power up to 6500rpm. Is it safe to spin a stock bottom end that high? Otherwise could just tell my tuner to back down to 6200 rpm or so...

    Whats your experiences?

    cheers
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: max revs on stock bottom end? 
    Moderator dsmuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Coldwater, OH
    Posts
    15,758
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I've revved mine that high but wouldn't really recommend it. I'm sticking to 6-6200
    98 GTP modded 1.9's, sd headers, 3.4", zzp 1.0 230K miles scrapped.
    04 Comp G zzp stb's, UMI ta's, Speedbuilt sways, bully flo heads, XP, zzp headers, fsic, thrasher shift kit, 60#, 2.6" corsa 2.5", Inferno hood
    01 gt z7 turbo tep trans zzp motor
    08 g8 gt cam exhaust 11.87@118
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: max revs on stock bottom end? 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    troll land
    Posts
    1,018
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Yeah these things are buick engines with crappy oilling systems
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: max revs on stock bottom end? 
    Killa Bee Scottydoggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    39,927
    Thanks (Received)
    63
    Likes (Received)
    166
    Dislikes (Received)
    5
    its not a buick engine lol its a Chevy technically. they all used the same engine across GM. its your valve springs that will hate you at those rpm's

    98 Buick Regal GS, F body brakes, Caddy STS wheels, tinted tails L36 bottom end, lightly ported heads, 1.95 roller rockers, headers, gen 5 N* 3.0 pulley, FSIC, 42 lb injectors, a BrandonHall rebuilt trans, DHP tuned and AEM water/Meth injection https://goo.gl/gpV5kW
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: max revs on stock bottom end? 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    troll land
    Posts
    1,018
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    No its TECHNICALLY a buick engine. Do some research. Designed by buick in the mid sixties. I had an 81 olds with a 231 and an 86 olds with a 455. Almost identical in basic design. Key design/flaw is the oil system which is like no chevy engine ive ever seen. And its technically a gmcorporate engine if your wanting to play that card. Try again[ QUOTE=Scottydoggs;1174859]its not a buick engine lol its a Chevy technically. they all used the same engine across GM. its your valve springs that will hate you at those rpm's[/QUOTE]
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: max revs on stock bottom end? 
    The Boss Iceman6669's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    7,488
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Received)
    38
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    97 GTP Sold-prolly rusted away by now
    2011 F-150 Yote powered
    Too Hot to Handle, Too Cold to Hold
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: max revs on stock bottom end? 
    GTP Level Member Twizted 1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Summertown Tn
    Posts
    640
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Good lord, that thing Screams!

    Sent from Not so smart smartphone
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: max revs on stock bottom end? 
    Killa Bee Scottydoggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    39,927
    Thanks (Received)
    63
    Likes (Received)
    166
    Dislikes (Received)
    5
    you talking the 80's, olds Buick Pontiac and Chevy were all still a bit different, most common things that were different looking was the intake manifold, the timing cover and the water pump.

    olds Pontiac and Buick all looked similar, (not the same at all) and Chevy was way different.

    once the 90's hit they all used one engine pretty much across the board, aka the Chevy engine.


    note how the same l67 is in impalas, montie's, regals, riviera's, gtps, park abe ultras, and bonnies. they all use the same engine

    98 Buick Regal GS, F body brakes, Caddy STS wheels, tinted tails L36 bottom end, lightly ported heads, 1.95 roller rockers, headers, gen 5 N* 3.0 pulley, FSIC, 42 lb injectors, a BrandonHall rebuilt trans, DHP tuned and AEM water/Meth injection https://goo.gl/gpV5kW
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: max revs on stock bottom end? 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    troll land
    Posts
    1,018
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    And the whole front cover and oil filer adapter scream buick
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: max revs on stock bottom end? 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    troll land
    Posts
    1,018
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Yeah and chevy was the last to get them. Its like saying a duramax is not a diesel cause its in a chev. After tearing apart a bunch of l67s i noticed the disassembly and design is nearly identical to my 231
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: max revs on stock bottom end? 
    GTP Level Member Twizted 1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Summertown Tn
    Posts
    640
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by l67ss View Post
    Yeah and chevy was the last to get them. Its like saying a duramax is not a diesel cause its in a chev. After tearing apart a bunch of l67s i noticed the disassembly and design is nearly identical to my 231

    Technically you and scotty are both off on your statements, since the mid/late 80's
    Pontiac, buick and the like hasn't designed any engines. GM took the market and designed all of the engines for their B*tch companies that built cars to make GM rich. Then later gave them an excuse to file bankruptcy.
    But the engines are specifically GM.
    Not chevy or buick. Im with scotty though, they are designed more like the Chevy minus two cylinders.

    And the duramax was designed by izuzu. Lol. Let's not attack that sh*tty subject

    Sent from Not so smart smartphone
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: max revs on stock bottom end? 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    troll land
    Posts
    1,018
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    DIESEL ENGINES WERE DESIGNED BY A MAN BY THE LAST NAME DIESEL. Troll attempt, fail. And what in the design aside from the lifters is more like a chevy? Are saying i can use the parts to tipswap a chevy. Or that i can use 4.3 parts to get eid of the external oil passage?
    Quote Originally Posted by Twizted 1 View Post
    Technically you and scotty are both off on your statements, since the mid/late 80's
    Pontiac, buick and the like hasn't designed any engines. GM took the market and designed all of the engines for their B*tch companies that built cars to make GM rich. Then later gave them an excuse to file bankruptcy.
    But the engines are specifically GM.
    Not chevy or buick. Im with scotty though, they are designed more like the Chevy minus two cylinders.

    And the duramax was designed by izuzu. Lol. Let's not attack that sh*tty subject

    Sent from Not so smart smartphone
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: max revs on stock bottom end? 
    GXP Level Member Turbocharged400sbc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    hangover park IL
    Posts
    2,714
    Thanks (Received)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    11
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Twizted 1 View Post
    Technically you and scotty are both off on your statements, since the mid/late 80's
    Pontiac, buick and the like hasn't designed any engines. GM took the market and designed all of the engines for their B*tch companies that built cars to make GM rich. Then later gave them an excuse to file bankruptcy.
    But the engines are specifically GM.
    Not chevy or buick. Im with scotty though, they are designed more like the Chevy minus two cylinders.

    And the duramax was designed by izuzu. Lol. Let's not attack that sh*tty subject

    Sent from Not so smart smartphone
    sorry but its a buick...it shares no architecture with the sbc based "chevy" v6 aside from them both being split journal on center v6 engines
    it does however share every major component with its ancestors. you can bolt a 62 buick v6 head to an 09 SII...same bolt pattern...right down to the same 7/16ths threads in the cylinder deck.

    the LC3/LG3/LN3/L27/SI L67/ and the SII (L26/36 and L67/32 are all buick decendants...not a damn one of em is a "clean sheet" design....you dont think gm fired all their engine guys that were champions of the turbo buick...no they rolled them into developing the v6 further. lotta buick enthusiast in GM...

    plain point of this is that the 3800 is a direct buick v8/v6 descendant and shares little with the much younger chevy v6
    ~James~ Psychotic Gearhead
    projects: 84 Cressida waGN~ 90 LN3 3800, equal length headers, T70, 89 700r4, misc parts,
    1994 Oldsmobile 442 (462ci-4wd-2 engines) L67/4t80e^2,
    00 Turbo Regal 608 fwhp 575ftlbs at 5500rpm, 98 WhippledRiv, 97 GTP
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: max revs on stock bottom end? 
    Turbo is the way to go. Fivefingerdeathpunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    21,022
    Thanks (Received)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    45
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Stick with a shift rpm of 6,000, the motor will spin to 6200ish before it shifts.

    Make sure your valvetrain can handle it.

    SMGPFC Member #1
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: max revs on stock bottom end? 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    troll land
    Posts
    1,018
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    ^this
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: max revs on stock bottom end? 
    The Boss Iceman6669's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    7,488
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Received)
    38
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Personally with the proper valve train setup I would run an XP setup to 6500 rpm.
    97 GTP Sold-prolly rusted away by now
    2011 F-150 Yote powered
    Too Hot to Handle, Too Cold to Hold
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: max revs on stock bottom end? 
    Killa Bee Scottydoggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    39,927
    Thanks (Received)
    63
    Likes (Received)
    166
    Dislikes (Received)
    5
    how long will the timing chain last tho?

    98 Buick Regal GS, F body brakes, Caddy STS wheels, tinted tails L36 bottom end, lightly ported heads, 1.95 roller rockers, headers, gen 5 N* 3.0 pulley, FSIC, 42 lb injectors, a BrandonHall rebuilt trans, DHP tuned and AEM water/Meth injection https://goo.gl/gpV5kW
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: max revs on stock bottom end? 
    The Boss Iceman6669's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    7,488
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Received)
    38
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    With 105s should be ok.
    97 GTP Sold-prolly rusted away by now
    2011 F-150 Yote powered
    Too Hot to Handle, Too Cold to Hold
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19 Re: max revs on stock bottom end? 
    Killa Bee Scottydoggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    39,927
    Thanks (Received)
    63
    Likes (Received)
    166
    Dislikes (Received)
    5
    anything over 6300 to 6500 scares me. what are you really gaining with the few more rpm's?

    98 Buick Regal GS, F body brakes, Caddy STS wheels, tinted tails L36 bottom end, lightly ported heads, 1.95 roller rockers, headers, gen 5 N* 3.0 pulley, FSIC, 42 lb injectors, a BrandonHall rebuilt trans, DHP tuned and AEM water/Meth injection https://goo.gl/gpV5kW
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20 Re: max revs on stock bottom end? 
    The Boss Iceman6669's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    7,488
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Received)
    38
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    An XP cam is a higher powerband cam. Revving up high is where that cam really makes good power.
    97 GTP Sold-prolly rusted away by now
    2011 F-150 Yote powered
    Too Hot to Handle, Too Cold to Hold
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replacing L67 bottom end for L26 bottom end
    By OcalaGTP in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-27-2013, 06:05 PM
  2. high revs as i start car
    By Jrs1987 in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 11-05-2011, 06:28 PM
  3. Revs go up/not changing gears?
    By SUGAR in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 04-18-2011, 11:07 PM
  4. trans revs out
    By kbmukdk2316 in forum Pre-1996 4 speed Automatic (4T60E)(4T60E-HD)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-01-2010, 02:50 PM
  5. bottom swap, or how i learned to rebuild the bottom end completely
    By almighty in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-18-2009, 03:37 AM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •