Thread: Depressing Fuel Economy... :(

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 32
  1. #1 Depressing Fuel Economy... :( 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Norman, Oklahoma
    Posts
    8
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I drive a 1999 GTP. Engine has 105k miles. U-bend delete and CAI are the only modifications. I run conventional oil. I have been paying close attention to my mileage since the fuel prices are on the rise again. My past 5 tanks have been averaging a mere 17.6 MPG. That is 85% highway driving at 60 MPH with very little traffic. The mileage was calculated by dividing the mileage on the trip odometer by fuel used, not using the information center. The engine performs flawlessly and runs great. No rough idle or anything. I have changed the fuel filter, cleaned the throttle body, replaced plugs and wires, scanned for codes, checked for fuel leaks, checked fuel pressure, checked compression, and checked tire pressure. Everything was normal.

    With that being said, from the research I have done on this site, the mileage I am averaging is not normal. Does anyone have any suggestions on what I should check next? Last summer I was averaging 25 with the same driving habits. Also, can anyone offer any suggestions to improve fuel economy? I have heard switching to synthetic oil could improve economy. Would probably be a good idea to switch anyways with 105k miles. Thanks!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: Depressing Fuel Economy... :( 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    31
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Weird mine, when i had my '00 GTP, got around 25 average combined. 30 highway. Could have o2 sensor(s) going bad.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: Depressing Fuel Economy... :( 
    Moderator dsmuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Coldwater, OH
    Posts
    15,758
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    what kind of plugs did you put in it?
    98 GTP modded 1.9's, sd headers, 3.4", zzp 1.0 230K miles scrapped.
    04 Comp G zzp stb's, UMI ta's, Speedbuilt sways, bully flo heads, XP, zzp headers, fsic, thrasher shift kit, 60#, 2.6" corsa 2.5", Inferno hood
    01 gt z7 turbo tep trans zzp motor
    08 g8 gt cam exhaust 11.87@118
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    SE Level Member Compg4me's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Grand rapids Mi
    Posts
    116
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Try cleaning your maf sensor? I've read that it can help get a little better mpg's. You also get worse mileage in winter months when it's colder than you would in warmer weather.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: Depressing Fuel Economy... :( 
    GrandPrix Junkie
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    4,735
    Thanks (Received)
    18
    Likes (Received)
    76
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dsmuts View Post
    what kind of plugs did you put in it?
    ^^THIS^^

    These motors do not like platinum plugs, and Bosch in particular. Besides cleaning the MAF the only other thing I can think of would be the EGR. Maybe run your tires at a few higher PSI (go by the rating on the tire, not the door sticker). I usually keep mine at around 35 on my Kumho's.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: Depressing Fuel Economy... :( 
    GT Level Member ShadowSwept's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    486
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by FordMan77 View Post
    ^^THIS^^

    These motors do not like platinum plugs, and Bosch in particular. Besides cleaning the MAF the only other thing I can think of would be the EGR. Maybe run your tires at a few higher PSI (go by the rating on the tire, not the door sticker). I usually keep mine at around 35 on my Kumho's.
    I got some PP606 plugs, but I haven't put them in yet. Should I take them back? I'm getting the same milage, but I just found out the connector on my MAF sensor is broken.
    2001 Bonneville SLE - L36, Cone Filter, 200k miles
    2003 Grand Prix GT
    - L36, Short Ram Intake, HV3, Emissions Delete, ZZP 3" Downpipe, Overkill Tune, 200k miles

    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: Depressing Fuel Economy... :( 
    GrandPrix Junkie
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    4,735
    Thanks (Received)
    18
    Likes (Received)
    76
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Well, if a PP606 is a Platinum plug, then yes take them back. Most here recommend either AC Delco's (stock replacement), Autolite, or NGK. A good copper or irridium plug will work much better in our type of waste spark ignition system.

    Here is some info to help you out....

    4) Spark Plugs - Change out those stock spark plugs with new ones to restore any lost power. Brands that most tend to go with are either Copper Core Autolites or NGK Spark Plugs. Get these at your local auto parts store also. They range as follows in order from hottest to coldest plugs...remember...you want the hottest spark possible...so running a super cold plug on a larger pulley to combat knock isn't the best plan...ACD's, AL606's, and AL605's are basically for stock cars or very small bolt ons still running the stock S/C Pulley or modded N/A guys...you want to keep a hot spark. NGKTR55/AL104's for your 3.4" Setup, TR6's are a tad cooler...best used around the 3.25" pulley area, and AL103's...are for the extreme supercharged application...3.0" pulley or lower. Here is a picture to reference the firing order and the correct coil number if yours aren't numbered or you just need a quick reference picture: http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d6.../plugwires.jpg

    AC Delco Factory Replacements: Stock
    Autolite 606: Stock
    Autolite 605: 1 Heat Range Cooler
    NGK TR55: 1 Heat Range Cooler
    Autolite 104: 2 Heat Ranges Cooler
    NGK TR6: 2 Heat Ranges Cooler
    Autolite 103: 3 Heat Rangles Cooler
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: Depressing Fuel Economy... :( 
    GT Level Member ShadowSwept's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    486
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    They're Autolite double platinum. Got them for my SE but never installed. I was about to change them on my GT.
    2001 Bonneville SLE - L36, Cone Filter, 200k miles
    2003 Grand Prix GT
    - L36, Short Ram Intake, HV3, Emissions Delete, ZZP 3" Downpipe, Overkill Tune, 200k miles

    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: Depressing Fuel Economy... :( 
    GrandPrix Junkie
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    4,735
    Thanks (Received)
    18
    Likes (Received)
    76
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Yep, take em back if you can. I run the NGK TR55's on my 00 GT and it runs just fine, and the last time I pulled all 6 plugs w/ about 15K on them all they needed was a cleaning and re-gap and they keep on tickin. Nice smooth idle and get about 410 mi. to a full tank, but 85% of my driving is highway at 65mph.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: Depressing Fuel Economy... :( 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    You could try changing the PCV. And maybe checking your vaccuum(spelling) lines for a leak.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: Depressing Fuel Economy... :( 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Norman, Oklahoma
    Posts
    8
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I changed the PCV valve today, also changed the spark plugs and wires. I installed NGK iridium. Also changed the oil to mobile 1 synthetic. I cleaned the mass airflow sensor as well. I disconnected the battery for two hours to reset the computer while I changed everything. I will report back with the mileage. Thanks to everyone for the help!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: Depressing Fuel Economy... :( 
    I live here. SlowNA06's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    5,928
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Also: check tire pressure (since I didn't see that mentioned).
    Irridium spark plugs last 100k mi and work just as well as copper. Copper is a waste on N/A and only lasts 15k mi. Don't use Platinum.
    Use 195* tstat unless you can thoroughly explain why not; 99.9% don't need a lower temp.
    Almost any oil filter, ever, is of higher quality than ACDelco. Spend $6+.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: Depressing Fuel Economy... :( 
    GXP Level Member txslow6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,652
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    You might also consider a fuel injection cleaning and pay attention to the tire PSI. Also try a different gas station as I have found my mpg will fluctuate pending where I got the gas. Around me I get the best mpg with Shell.
    85 Corvette
    01 TA
    03 Z06
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: Depressing Fuel Economy... :( 
    GTP Level Member Rico's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Fort Worth TX
    Posts
    1,721
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Does anyone really think that spark plugs will decrease fuel milage by 32%?
    I think I'll remove my iridiums and replace them with the cheapest platinums and see if this is true.
    Last edited by Rico; 03-16-2012 at 01:00 AM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: Depressing Fuel Economy... :( 
    I live here. brandonl2000's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Grand Rapids, MI
    Posts
    6,705
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    don't use platinum plugs. delco iridiums are excellent for a stock vehicle. or you can do coppers. never platinum.
    2003 Grand Prix GTP-3.5 setup, sold it, miss it
    2002 Grand Prix GT-top swap, GT1 Cam, SD Headers, 90# springs, 42.5 injectors, 3.4 pulley - sold
    2012 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ-Summit White, 1.4Turbo
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: Depressing Fuel Economy... :( 
    I live here. SlowNA06's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    5,928
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Rico View Post
    Does anyone really think that spark plugs will decrease fuel milage by 32%?
    I think I'll remove my iridiums and replace them with the cheapest platinums and see if this is true.
    Platinums will work and the mileage difference will not be significant. 1-2mpg either way. But. Platinums get brittle (because of waste spark ignition) and break. In the engine. Where the party's at.
    Irridium spark plugs last 100k mi and work just as well as copper. Copper is a waste on N/A and only lasts 15k mi. Don't use Platinum.
    Use 195* tstat unless you can thoroughly explain why not; 99.9% don't need a lower temp.
    Almost any oil filter, ever, is of higher quality than ACDelco. Spend $6+.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: Depressing Fuel Economy... :( 
    I live here. SlowNA06's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    5,928
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    And now that I think about it... check your brakes. Make sure they move and groove all sexy. Once had a pad stuck on the rotor. Instant 17mpg highway.
    Irridium spark plugs last 100k mi and work just as well as copper. Copper is a waste on N/A and only lasts 15k mi. Don't use Platinum.
    Use 195* tstat unless you can thoroughly explain why not; 99.9% don't need a lower temp.
    Almost any oil filter, ever, is of higher quality than ACDelco. Spend $6+.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: Depressing Fuel Economy... :( 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Norman, Oklahoma
    Posts
    8
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    UPDATE

    I had new tires installed and had the tires filled with nitrogen. I also switched from NGK iridium plugs to Delco iridium. I had the transmission checked for binding on the shifts. I checked brakes, rotors and wheel hubs. All checked out free of binding. I checked for vacuum leaks. None were detected. My wife and I just got back from a road trip from Norman Oklahoma to Houston Texas. Roughly a 1000 mile round trip @65MPH with the cruise control. Sadly, I barely maintained a 24MPG average. I really don't know what else can be done at tis point. I have tried everything I could think of as well as all of your suggestions. 24MPG is far better than the 17MPG I was getting before. However, a friend of mine who also has a 99 GTP, Bone stock like mine, but over 270k miles. He is averaging 27.5MPG. Just doesn't seem right.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19  
    GrandPrix Junkie Sandman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Tallahassee, FL
    Posts
    3,538
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I don't know if its been said or not but alignment? Mine was out of whack but the car still drove straight and gained some mileage back after everything was in spec.
    05 Saab 9-2X Linear (Saabaru)
    77 Morris Garage B
    Quote Originally Posted by TLSheff View Post
    You said "I'm done with it"... car says "Oh, really? *trollface*"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20 Re: Depressing Fuel Economy... :( 
    Turbo is the way to go. Fivefingerdeathpunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    21,030
    Thanks (Received)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    45
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    You are running 91+ gas right?

    The only thing I can think of is maybe the front 02 sensor is not reading 100% correct but still not enough to trip an SES light.

    Right now its getting hard to diagnois stuff over the internet, being there with the car and scan tool would be the best but that cant be the case.

    SMGPFC Member #1
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Fuel Economy
    By timreams in forum 3.8L V6 Naturally Aspirated (L36)(L26)
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-11-2011, 03:29 PM
  2. Bad fuel economy
    By Blackbird87 in forum 3.1L V6 (LHO/LG8)
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 02-26-2011, 01:52 PM
  3. 3rd Gear Fuel Economy
    By Knipdm01 in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-25-2010, 10:33 AM
  4. 04 GTP Bad Fuel Economy
    By pr84704p in forum 04+ Specifics
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-16-2010, 08:10 PM
  5. Fuel Economy???
    By Andrew_99GTP in forum Off Topic Discussion
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 06-07-2008, 09:31 PM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •