Thread: Pulley Drop Vs Higher Timing (Custom Tune)

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 48
  1. #21 Re: Pulley Drop Vs Higher Timing (Custom Tune) 
    GTP Level Member 01gpgt01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Hagerstown,Md
    Posts
    1,933
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Timing should peak at the top of the power band and drop off as you redline. Most people just run the same the entire way thru
    2001 GT. A few here and there mods http://www.streetfire.net/video/2001...ynp_208097.htm

    2009 Hummer H3 Solar flare premium
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #22 Re: Pulley Drop Vs Higher Timing (Custom Tune) 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 01gpgt01 View Post
    Timing should peak at the top of the power band and drop off as you redline. Most people just run the same the entire way thru
    Apparently increasing timing as you go up is a better way to do it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #23 Re: Pulley Drop Vs Higher Timing (Custom Tune) 
    Donating Users gtpsleeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Lawrence, Kansas, United States
    Posts
    1,351
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by matt5112 View Post
    Apparently increasing timing as you go up is a better way to do it.


    "My car is a racecar like Planet Fitness is a gym...."

    proud mark VIII victim!!! suck it...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #24 Re: Pulley Drop Vs Higher Timing (Custom Tune) 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I recall jeremy saying that increasing timing as you went up is ideal.

    Note I say apparently.

    Never looked into this further.

    It stands to reason that you have less time to burn the fuel at higher engine speeds.

    Thus you need to start the burn sooner if the fuel burns at the same rate.

    Make-a-teh-sense?

    I didn't think so either....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #25 Re: Pulley Drop Vs Higher Timing (Custom Tune) 
     

  6. #26 Re: Pulley Drop Vs Higher Timing (Custom Tune) 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    If you can run the timing KR free, how is it asking for anything?

    Also looking into it... it seems our knock sensors are very old school.... and a better system would probably result in less KR..... But thats something different altogether.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #27 Re: Pulley Drop Vs Higher Timing (Custom Tune) 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    but whats the point of running higher timing up top than in the mid range when you can more easily run it there? therefore, that point of running a static WOT timing.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #28 Re: Pulley Drop Vs Higher Timing (Custom Tune) 
    GXP Level Member Poil336's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Troy OH
    Posts
    2,919
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    by my unerstanding, timing doesn't necessarily equal power. it just makes sure all your fuel combusts at TDC. you have to spark the fuel earlier when the piston's moving faster, and i guess at lower rpm's there's less pressure, meaning it would take longer for the fuel to burn. so if you run boost, you can spark it later since it's pressurized and it'll burn quicker. we're also talking about degrees of timing, i bet if you look at time in seconds between the the spark and TDC it would be roughly the same.

    or i'm way off and talking out of my ass
    99 GT - top swapped, S2X cam. - sadly, sold
    96 Firebird Formula - T-tops and exhaust leak. 14.26 @ 97.8 - sold
    2008 Chevrolet Cobalt SS - stock, in all of it's turbocharged awesomeness
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #29 Re: Pulley Drop Vs Higher Timing (Custom Tune) 
    Florida Tuner Z34Phoenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    873
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I once made a spreadsheet once that translated spark timing into actual time. All I remember is that as RPMs increased the time was smaller even with spark advance climbing as Roma went up. Makes sence as the Rome climb the total time is less for each cycle. But IIRC denser fuel and air is harder to light off as you want time for it to burn and not explode! If pressure is too high it will explode rather then burn and that's when you get Kr. It is ok to raise and lower spark thru out the table. But to be sure u are making more power a dyno is the only sure way. But a few deg here and there on a stock table will do the trick fine. If you are going far away from stock u deft need some real data.
    Last edited by Z34Phoenix; 05-08-2011 at 07:53 AM.

    96 Z34 (RIP LQ1 14.81@92.3) L36 Swap 14.9@91.5 www.cardomain.com/id/z34phoenix
    Topswap: P&P All,Si Valves,L76's,LW Pushrods,SD's,DHP PT PB 13.91@99.8
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #30 Re: Pulley Drop Vs Higher Timing (Custom Tune) 
    youtu.be/xhrBDcQq2DM FoSHO99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maquoketa, Iowa
    Posts
    2,943
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Depends a lot on the fuel your are running as well. When guys are trying to get the most out of their car, they are running 100-110 octane fuels, lean as hell on small pulleys. If people ran 21* timing across the board they started popping head gaskets, so they would run 18* at 4500 rpms and go up in steps from there, some would even go past 24. Obviously you could not do this on 91 octane, but some of the same theories may apply. Also 4000 rpms is about the range that the car is under the highest load, so timing there is not going to be the highest.
    2001 GTP PT61 Turbo, E85, Stock Motor
    2011 Chevy Cruze MT6 1.4L Turbo
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #31 Re: Pulley Drop Vs Higher Timing (Custom Tune) 
    GT Level Member TheAce144's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    211
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I asked the guys at ZZP and told me I would chip a piston with 20* of timing with my setup...guess I'm gonna see someone who has a dyno and can custom tune my car safely based on my mods.

    This thread is getting interesting, thanks for all the info!
    04 GTP CompG: SSAC Headers, 3.6" Modular Pulley System, Autolite 104, NGK Spark Plug Wires, CAI, ZZP 180 T-Stat, Overkill PCM (Custom Street Tuning By Will), Goodyear Eagle F1 Tires, Hawk HPS Brake Pads, Magnaflow Magnapacks 4", SE Front Fascia
    ---
    Check Out My Car! ---
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #32 Re: Pulley Drop Vs Higher Timing (Custom Tune) 
    Donating Users gtpsleeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Lawrence, Kansas, United States
    Posts
    1,351
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by FoSHO99 View Post
    Depends a lot on the fuel your are running as well. When guys are trying to get the most out of their car, they are running 100-110 octane fuels, lean as hell on small pulleys. If people ran 21* timing across the board they started popping head gaskets, so they would run 18* at 4500 rpms and go up in steps from there, some would even go past 24. Obviously you could not do this on 91 octane, but some of the same theories may apply. Also 4000 rpms is about the range that the car is under the highest load, so timing there is not going to be the highest.
    Not only will octane be a factor but, with ethonal being thrown in there, its gonna matter what KIND of fuel you run aswell...

    Since i switched, I cant MAKE my car knock...
    "My car is a racecar like Planet Fitness is a gym...."

    proud mark VIII victim!!! suck it...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #33 Re: Pulley Drop Vs Higher Timing (Custom Tune) 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by gtpsleeper View Post
    Not only will octane be a factor but, with ethonal being thrown in there, its gonna matter what KIND of fuel you run aswell...

    Since i switched, I cant MAKE my car knock...
    e85 has some crazy cooling properties and allows some stupid amounts of boost and timing without much more effort. i really wish i would have committed and done the switch instead of backing out.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #34 Re: Pulley Drop Vs Higher Timing (Custom Tune) 
    I AM PEWPIN! rynoman03's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Topeka, KS
    Posts
    3,669
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I wish e85 was more redly available in the rural communities and interstates. There's a station a block from my house that sells it but i'm too afraid to convert. I don't want to be stranded somewhere.
    1999 GTPHP Tuned, Ported SC/TB, 42#'s, SSAC's, ZZP Modded 1.9's/LS6 Springs/Manley's, TransGo Shift Kit, Poly Uppers, KYB GR2's/Springtech's. - 231k and traded it in. - Gone
    2000 GTP: XP, P&P'd Heads, N*\Lq4 MAF, GenV, 42#'s, PRJ Rails\FPR, Racetronix, TEP w/ 3.29 Gears, 300m, 7/8" chain, SSAC's. - Collecting dust in my garage.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #35 Re: Pulley Drop Vs Higher Timing (Custom Tune) 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    i would only do it on a car that i drove around town and i would constantly be topping it off at known stations with it. i wouldnt want it for a car that i took on road trips (all of them).
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #36 Re: Pulley Drop Vs Higher Timing (Custom Tune) 
    Florida Tuner Z34Phoenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    873
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Saying flat out that 20 deg of Timing will chip a piston is bad advice in my opinion. It deals more with AF ratio I would say then with the specific timing. If your too lean yeah you could have issues... Unless the pistons are that brittle? And the combustion makes too much pressure... But if that were the case everyone would be chipping pistons on higher HP setups and. Don't think this is the case.

    96 Z34 (RIP LQ1 14.81@92.3) L36 Swap 14.9@91.5 www.cardomain.com/id/z34phoenix
    Topswap: P&P All,Si Valves,L76's,LW Pushrods,SD's,DHP PT PB 13.91@99.8
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #37 Re: Pulley Drop Vs Higher Timing (Custom Tune) 
    youtu.be/xhrBDcQq2DM FoSHO99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maquoketa, Iowa
    Posts
    2,943
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Z34Phoenix View Post
    Saying flat out that 20 deg of Timing will chip a piston is bad advice in my opinion. It deals more with AF ratio I would say then with the specific timing. If your too lean yeah you could have issues... Unless the pistons are that brittle? And the combustion makes too much pressure... But if that were the case everyone would be chipping pistons on higher HP setups and. Don't think this is the case.
    They start popping headgaskets before they chip a piston on 110 leaded. People can see their timing easily so they like to focus on that, but a wideband is what few have, so street cars running 91 pump and trying to run 20* timing year round is what they label as unsafe and prone to chipping a piston. If people have no idea what their actual AFR is, then it's most likely good advice saying 20* is unsafe year around. Some can get away with it, some don't.
    2001 GTP PT61 Turbo, E85, Stock Motor
    2011 Chevy Cruze MT6 1.4L Turbo
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #38 Re: Pulley Drop Vs Higher Timing (Custom Tune) 
    Donating Users gtpsleeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Lawrence, Kansas, United States
    Posts
    1,351
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rynoman03 View Post
    I wish e85 was more redly available in the rural communities and interstates. There's a station a block from my house that sells it but i'm too afraid to convert. I don't want to be stranded somewhere.
    where do you drive your car? If you usually stay around the Topeka area we have stations EVERYWHERE...?

    Quote Originally Posted by FoSHO99 View Post
    They start popping headgaskets before they chip a piston on 110 leaded. People can see their timing easily so they like to focus on that, but a wideband is what few have, so street cars running 91 pump and trying to run 20* timing year round is what they label as unsafe and prone to chipping a piston. If people have no idea what their actual AFR is, then it's most likely good advice saying 20* is unsafe year around. Some can get away with it, some don't.
    im wondering if e85 guys can get away with the higher timing as long as there is no KR?

    this thread is getting interesting
    "My car is a racecar like Planet Fitness is a gym...."

    proud mark VIII victim!!! suck it...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #39 Re: Pulley Drop Vs Higher Timing (Custom Tune) 
    GT Level Member TheAce144's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    211
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Hey guys, I sent my question at Will from Overkill and got a very detailed answer. Here's how it goes :

    "I would do the headers and the pulley.
    I don't like to increase timing advance too much on the street for a couple of reasons. First is each degree of timing advance above 17* in my experience is worth 1.5 each, so not very much. In order to run close to 20*, you need about 8-9psi non-intercooled. You'll gain more power if you pulley down and get back to 10-11psi.
    Second is high timing on a forced induction car and on our 3800s included reduces that buffer zone of engine safety. In order to run 20* of timing, I need to increase the engine knock attack rates to safely run it. This is because the computer hears a certain amount of engine knock and is programmed on how much KR it will introduce to control it based on how much it hears. If you think of 17* of timing advance and the engine hears enough engine knock to introduce 3* KR, you're down to 14* timing advance. If you have 20* of timing advance and the computer hears the same amount of engine knock, it introduces 3* but you're only back to 17* now (20-3 versus 17-3). There's a big difference in engine safety when its knocking the same amount and running 14* vs 17*, so I need to tell it to reduce by more than 3*. This causes higher KR numbers and can result in more inconsistent performance as KR is introduced and then removed as needed.

    #1 it gives less horsepower than running more boost, if you don't have a good solid 10-11psi of boost. Each degree above 17* is worth roughly 1.5 wheel horsepower with no KR. Each psi of boost is significantly more.


    Fuel wise, more boost = more air = more fuel, so you will use more fuel under boost with the 3.6 versus the stock 3.8.

    Hope that helps explain why I recommend you go for the 3.6 pulley!"
    04 GTP CompG: SSAC Headers, 3.6" Modular Pulley System, Autolite 104, NGK Spark Plug Wires, CAI, ZZP 180 T-Stat, Overkill PCM (Custom Street Tuning By Will), Goodyear Eagle F1 Tires, Hawk HPS Brake Pads, Magnaflow Magnapacks 4", SE Front Fascia
    ---
    Check Out My Car! ---
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #40 Re: Pulley Drop Vs Higher Timing (Custom Tune) 
    GT Level Member jdmgtp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    341
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    very interesting
    2000 GTP, 3.2 pulley, SD headers, 3" exhaust, modded 1.9's, custom CAI, LS6 maf, ported blower/ TB, HPT, 65 lb injectors, E85 in the summer, LM-1 wideband, 180 stat, autolite 104's, GMHD suspension kit. 13.2@104 on street tires w/o ported s/c
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Should i get a pcm tune for a 3.5 pulley drop?
    By okesongtp in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 08-28-2010, 02:03 PM
  2. pulley drop 05
    By wlmrt6 in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-27-2010, 07:51 AM
  3. pulley drop question
    By blwn3800 in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-18-2009, 06:43 PM
  4. When do I need a custom tune for an 05?
    By Xorbex in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-30-2009, 02:47 PM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •