Thread: header option

Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1 header option 
    GT Level Member sdenton8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    marshalltown, iowa
    Posts
    181
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    im looking at the speed daddy headers and i know the slip joints are the problem with them and i was woundering if anyone has tried or thought about doing this....splitting the crossover and welding part to the front and rear header like the s&s headers. Maybe a short piece on the rear and longer on the front since the front is easier to install. Then just have a flange or v band welded to connect the crossover and you wouldnt have to worry bout slip joints leaking.



    also could i put my o2 sensor on the crossover like zzp has on their header or would that be a bad idea? If so that would take care of the sensor hitting the floor board.

    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: header option 
    Donating Users BoostnBlackGTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Waterloo, Iowa
    Posts
    1,251
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    i would like this idea also
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: header option 
    GT Level Member sdenton8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    marshalltown, iowa
    Posts
    181
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    i think it would be a good idea cuz it would solve the problem they have and make install easy. cleaner look also. just have to get them welded and thats not a big deal.

    what do you guys think
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: header option 
    Donating Users BoostnBlackGTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Waterloo, Iowa
    Posts
    1,251
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    u do it than i will follow
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: header option 
    GT Level Member sdenton8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    marshalltown, iowa
    Posts
    181
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    thinking about it. i bet someone has to of done it and hasnt said anything bout it. it would be like a ss knock off in a way. anyone done this step up
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: header option 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    doubtful that anyone has done it. replacing the slip joints with flanges is an okay idea, but you have to do it right or itll be an ever worse seal than the slip joint is.

    the o2 sensor relocation people have done.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: header option 
    GT Level Member sdenton8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    marshalltown, iowa
    Posts
    181
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    With the o2 relocation to say on the crossover would it still read proper or would it be off? I was curious if anyone done it or not. But you have a good point if not measured just right could make it a headache. Wat bout just welding it to the rear header like the zzp headers? Or could you do it to The front one and install them that way?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: header option 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    the S&S headers also had the o2 in the crossover. i never had a problem with it running funny because of it and i ran a wideband in the downpipe for tuning purposes. if youre tuning off the narrowband youre going to have a tune that is off regardless of what you do.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: header option 
    Bastard Reptile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    3,459
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Mine have the O2 in the crossover. Never had an issue with it being there. Runs the same and tunes the same. I wasn't sure about it when I bought them, but it seems to be a non issue, but it sure is a hell of a lot easier to change the sensor than all the others out there.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: header option 
    GT Level Member sdenton8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    marshalltown, iowa
    Posts
    181
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Yea I bet. I just want to move it so install would be easier and wouldn't have to worry bout the o2 hitting the tunnel. But how much low end does headers take away switching to them?
    It wouldn't be for tuning it would be just for the stock o2 sensor.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: header option 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    about nothing because youre gonna drop a pulley and gain it all back, plus some.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: header option 
    Bastard Reptile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    3,459
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    IF headers bleed off that much, believe it or not, some cars don't see a difference in boost when you add headers.

    Mine dropped 3 psi alone with a DP back in the day. Another buddy of mine, didn't see any difference.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: header option 
    GT Level Member sdenton8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    marshalltown, iowa
    Posts
    181
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Ok thanks for all the input guys. So it sounds like each car will react to headers different then. If you just add headers how much of a drop will it let you do? Also what if added hr rockets to the mix?
    Other thing is if switched to a gen V do I need tuned or anything?
    Thanks
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: header option 
    GT Level Member sdenton8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    marshalltown, iowa
    Posts
    181
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I got another question guys. How would a gen V with rockers work with a plog setup? Just getting info
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: header option 
    I AM PEWPIN! rynoman03's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Topeka, KS
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    It would work. But headers are better.

    Also I had 14.5 psi on my manifolds and a 3" dp. Since I've switched to headers the most I see now is 11psi on the 3.4.
    1999 GTPHP Tuned, Ported SC/TB, 42#'s, SSAC's, ZZP Modded 1.9's/LS6 Springs/Manley's, TransGo Shift Kit, Poly Uppers, KYB GR2's/Springtech's. - 231k and traded it in. - Gone
    2000 GTP: XP, P&P'd Heads, N*\Lq4 MAF, GenV, 42#'s, PRJ Rails\FPR, Racetronix, TEP w/ 3.29 Gears, 300m, 7/8" chain, SSAC's. - Collecting dust in my garage.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: header option 
    club of used to own a gp 99prixgt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Jersey
    Posts
    4,643
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by sdenton8 View Post
    I got another question guys. How would a gen V with rockers work with a plog setup? Just getting info
    kinda crappy. I didn't like the way my car was running like that but, i also have an L36 car. When i switched to headers, i felt a difference.
    16' wrx sti- stock
    06 Spice Red GTO- m6/exhaust/tune/suspension/377whp-383tq-sold
    99 silvermist gp gt-g5/xp/IC/3.0mps-parted&sold
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. New option for PLOG
    By Phantom in forum 3.8L V6 Naturally Aspirated (L36)(L26)
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-25-2011, 09:06 PM
  2. Which Option?
    By KawaFord in forum Off Topic Discussion
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 07-16-2010, 04:24 PM
  3. Best 1.5 din receiver option for 97-03 GP?
    By Juanmiguel in forum Audio, Security & Visual Electronics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-29-2010, 10:42 AM
  4. best option
    By conradgtp in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-11-2010, 11:55 AM
  5. option codes
    By mikedinthecity in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-11-2009, 10:36 AM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •