Thread: Running 2002 GTP w/o cat = bad MPG???

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1 Running 2002 GTP w/o cat = bad MPG??? 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    New Brunswick, Canada
    Posts
    8
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Hey there, This past summer the catalytic converter 1st stage fell apart and plugged the 2nd stage section on my 2002 GTP which prompted me in deleting the cat. Prior to the cat failure the car ran good with decent mileage (approx 25 mpg). Since then I have changed the plugs out for Autolite copper 606's side gapped to 0.050" as well as NGK oem replacement wires. Now under the same driving conditions of 50/50 highway & city I am only getting 17 mpg. My question is if I need to run an O2 emulator in order to improve the mileage. My scan tool shows that the Catalyst Efficiency code comes in repeatedly every 100 miles approximately. Anyone out there experience these symptoms?? Any feedback is much appreciated,

    Thanks in advance, Jeremy
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: Running 2002 GTP w/o cat = bad MPG??? 
    SE Level Member bstuby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    charleston, IL
    Posts
    136
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Yes you will keep throwin codes unless you get a o2 sim or you get your pcm tuned to read no report for the o2 sensor. I cant imagine it hurtin your mpg that bad tho, but someone correct me if im wrong but i thought the plugs were suppose to be gapped to .055-.060 for stock plugs. And depends on how your driving it, if your flooring from one redlight to the next then you should expect mpg like that. I have a 98 with no cat, egr, or o2 and i still get 31 on the interstate and about 23 in town
    98 GTP/ SD Headers, 180 T Stat, AL 104's, CAI, Intense pcm, 3.4 thrasher mps
    98 TA, Pacesetter coated LT/ ORY/ LS6 Intake/ SLP Lid/ Magnaflow CB/ Tuned
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: Running 2002 GTP w/o cat = bad MPG??? 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Jeremy...since your car is a '01+ car your only option is to leave the rear o2 and have the code set to no report...they '01+ cars NEED a rear o2 to run correctly.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: Running 2002 GTP w/o cat = bad MPG??? 
    GTP Level Member Bedwards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    863
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bluegtp91 View Post
    Jeremy...since your car is a '01+ car your only option is to leave the rear o2 and have the code set to no report...they '01+ cars NEED a rear o2 to run correctly.
    I have a 2001 and I have no problems with my rear O2 removed.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: Running 2002 GTP w/o cat = bad MPG??? 
    Bastard Reptile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    3,459
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    The rear O2 issue is hit and miss on the 01+ cars. Most of the time it's easier to leave the rear sensor in, and set the code to not report, but leave the diagnostic code turned on so it will read the senor.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: Running 2002 GTP w/o cat = bad MPG??? 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    New Brunswick, Canada
    Posts
    8
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Ok, so my best option is just to disable the routine O2 sensor reference. How do I go about doing that? As far as driving style goes I rarely go WOT and use the s/c for the few hills along the highway between home and the city. Cruising at speeds of around 65-70 mph. Prior to the cat getting removed MPG's were substantially better even with wore out plugs and wires. The car only has 95,000 miles on it and I run 91 octane fuel. I just refilled the car and it worked out to 18.4 MPG. The onboard computer is saying that I am getting 19.6 MPG.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: Running 2002 GTP w/o cat = bad MPG??? 
    Bastard Reptile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    3,459
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    So if the code is set, that means it's reading the rear O2 like it should.

    You might have problems someplace else.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: Running 2002 GTP w/o cat = bad MPG??? 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by motoshrump View Post
    Ok, so my best option is just to disable the routine O2 sensor reference. How do I go about doing that? As far as driving style goes I rarely go WOT and use the s/c for the few hills along the highway between home and the city. Cruising at speeds of around 65-70 mph. Prior to the cat getting removed MPG's were substantially better even with wore out plugs and wires. The car only has 95,000 miles on it and I run 91 octane fuel. I just refilled the car and it worked out to 18.4 MPG. The onboard computer is saying that I am getting 19.6 MPG.
    Vacuum leak? Have you check for any of those? Might have some dry rotted "T" fittings around the S/C, LIM, Fuel Rails...I'd check those...you get some pretty craptastic MPG's with a vac leak...you can spray some carb cleaner around the engine bay while its idling...if the idle changes and it sucks in the carb cleaner...you might have found your issue
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: Running 2002 GTP w/o cat = bad MPG??? 
    Bastard Reptile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    3,459
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Sometimes the vacuum leak is too small to find just by listening to the engine...say a pinhole, or a crack in a line boot won't always make the engine change rpm when you hit it with carb cleaner. The best and true way to tell is with some sort of scanner. The car's sensitive to the slightest changes, so even a leak you can't normally tell is there, you're likely to find by looking at the fuel trims on the scanner. It's so much easier that this is the first thing I do when I start tracing for leaks.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: Running 2002 GTP w/o cat = bad MPG??? 
    GTX Level Member Ricky21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    802
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Reptile View Post
    The best and true way to tell is with some sort of scanner. The car's sensitive to the slightest changes, so even a leak you can't normally tell is there, you're likely to find by looking at the fuel trims on the scanner. It's so much easier that this is the first thing I do when I start tracing for leaks.
    What should the fuel trims be at?
    Open cone, SSAC headers, cat delete, 8.5 MSD wires, 3.4 zzp mps, 180*, 104's, ported blower, DHP canned tune, 19" XXR 962s, DNA springs.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. 2002 GP running bad
    By JWJR in forum 3.8L V6 Naturally Aspirated (L36)(L26)
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-06-2011, 01:26 PM
  2. GTP Running Rough.. few new parts but still not running right.. HELP
    By azmattaz06 in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-29-2010, 02:34 PM
  3. 2002 GT in OH
    By bigbair45 in forum Introductions/Noob Questions
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-05-2010, 11:41 AM
  4. 2002 GTP vs. 2002 audi S4
    By JbrownGTP in forum Track Sessions and Kills
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 07-07-2009, 11:50 PM
  5. 2002 gt
    By Snake in forum Introductions/Noob Questions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-01-2009, 08:38 PM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •