Thread: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake

Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 182
  1. #61 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    utah
    Posts
    37
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    what about when you're driving around for an hour and decide to get on it? You will be welcomed with a handful of slow, that's what.
    haha great!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #62 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    that's also 100% wrong because when youre moving the temperatures drop to ambient or maybe a degree or two higher.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #63 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    Specialist Walter US Army Spartan GL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Largo, Florida, United States
    Posts
    2,907
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by okesongtp View Post
    I managed to combine "open cone" & "Boxed CAI" with a homemade air box made out of a rubbermaid plastic storage container. Works greatand cost about $60 to build.
    should also remove that engine cover!

    XPZ, Alum heads,150#, I/C, GEN V mps 3.0, N* TB CAI K&N fully built trans, JE pistons, L32 rods, Comp lifters, PRJ Fuel rails, 65# Injectors, elec pump, MSD wires, MSD coils, Alum control arms, AGX, vogtland, GMPP sway bars, rear trailing arms
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #64 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    His intake design was worse than the engine cover, trust me.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #65 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    Donating Users coreygnar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    1,668
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    someone pointed out to me that the dyno data could easily be faulty. when the dyno tests were done, it was likely that the hoods were open right?
    so that would totally throw off the data... it would be different with a closed hood keeping the hot air in right?
    '00 GT- nothing special
    My only advice: Don't take my advice

    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #66 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    5 WHP is within the margin of error i'd venture to say...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #67 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    Donating Users coreygnar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    1,668
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    i know its nothing big... but just pointing it out
    '00 GT- nothing special
    My only advice: Don't take my advice

    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #68 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    but who cares, even with the hood closed there is lots of air moving through the engine bay so long as youre not sitting at a stop light.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #69 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    #Billsnamechangessuck MrPoopyButthole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    15,112
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I would like to see the numbers on a stock intake.

    This has been a debate over on over forums for years. Intakes add a few horses but nothing major.

    I would like to see if my velocity stack adds a few more horses over the standard intake...maybe once I'm tuned and I am just playing around, I'll go to the dyno and compare stock vs standard vs velocity stack.

    Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war.
    2004 Saab 9-5 Aero - WAHSAABI - Way too much power/Koni FSD & Hirsch Springs/Big Sways - DD/AutoX'r
    2007 Ford F-150 Lariat - 5.4L V8 - Bill secretly likes it
    2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport SE - Wifey Mobile
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #70 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    GTP Level Member dmahlikGT's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,931
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Im with drunkie.I would also like to see exactly how much whp is gained over a stock intake versus like a fwi or open cone or even a cai.
    04 GTP-3.6 pulley, custom tuned, Intake, headers,thrush exhaust, al104 plugs, 180* stat, shift kit, flipped mounts

    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #71 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    intakes dont make power, they allow power.

    you only really need it once you start getting to smaller pulleys where the flow is necessary.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #72 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    #Billsnamechangessuck MrPoopyButthole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    15,112
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bio248 View Post
    intakes dont make power, they allow power.

    you only really need it once you start getting to smaller pulleys where the flow is necessary.
    Agreed, but I bet a stock intake will be within' 5whp on a full bolt-on/rockered/3.4 setup.

    Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war.
    2004 Saab 9-5 Aero - WAHSAABI - Way too much power/Koni FSD & Hirsch Springs/Big Sways - DD/AutoX'r
    2007 Ford F-150 Lariat - 5.4L V8 - Bill secretly likes it
    2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport SE - Wifey Mobile
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #73 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    GTX Level Member tod1d's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Winnipeg, MB
    Posts
    1,337
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dmahlikGT View Post
    Im with drunkie.I would also like to see exactly how much whp is gained over a stock intake versus like a fwi or open cone or even a cai.
    X3 this would be interesting to see

    2007 Pontiac Grand Prix
    http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2990036
    L26, CAI, HV3, ER Rockers, PLOG, Overkill Tune, flipped dog bones
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #74 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    759
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I have gone to an open HAI intake from my ZZP CAI since I threw my IC on and either a lot of you supporting the HAI have no idea what you are talking about or are just lying. When I had my CAI I was always within 5* of ambient temp when cruising. Now with my HAI its usually 40* higher on the dot than ambient temp, its ridiculous. Let's hear it
    Slowest 'Cooled Gen V ever

    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #75 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    But when your moving...the temps go down. Flow> Ambient Temps.

    Which is all that matters...who races in traffic when your car is heatsoaked?

    Not I.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #76 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    Donating Users Taz Magister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    2,153
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    yay finally a some proof on paper! sadly I'm sure someones still going to try and say else... I figure the open cone always flows better because it can draw air more easily than anything else which why I will not get a box for my gtx hood... Yea it might be ram air but I'd have to be going like 90mph+ for it to really do anything
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #77 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    759
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bluegtp91 View Post
    But when your moving...the temps go down. Flow> Ambient Temps.

    Which is all that matters...who races in traffic when your car is heatsoaked?

    Not I.
    Both. I cruise on the highway for about 20 minutes everyday each way to and from work, it stays 40* above ambient. In town is even worse, usually about 50*.

    When flow isn't effected why not have lower intake temps?

    Who races on the freeway anyways? Besides ricers of course. Pretty sure you don't get to cruise around at the track before you run, and from my experience that doesn't lower intake temps anyways.

    Continue
    Slowest 'Cooled Gen V ever

    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #78 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DrunkieTheBear View Post
    Agreed, but I bet a stock intake will be within' 5whp on a full bolt-on/rockered/3.4 setup.
    this is probably true.

    Quote Originally Posted by footballplaya3k View Post
    I have gone to an open HAI intake from my ZZP CAI since I threw my IC on and either a lot of you supporting the HAI have no idea what you are talking about or are just lying. When I had my CAI I was always within 5* of ambient temp when cruising. Now with my HAI its usually 40* higher on the dot than ambient temp, its ridiculous. Let's hear it
    so regardless of the higher intake temperatures, are you making about the same amount of power with a way cheaper intake with less parts? i would say you are.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #79 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    759
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Couldn't say. I just can back in here after I saw your post higher up on this page about a HAI being within a few degrees of ambient temp and it made me lol.
    Slowest 'Cooled Gen V ever

    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #80 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Because when your moving...it does sit within Ambient temp...my intake temps (when moving) never get more than 5*~ of what it is outside. I've never seen any interesting reasons to spend another $150+ to gain you nothing.

    Ricers race on the highway...which is why all of your videos you posted on here are highway runs

    I yank the headlight...and wait for it to be cooler before I go to the track anyways...I'd never waste money on a hot day.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Any way to quiet down an intake during the "warm up" stage?
    By nickbuol in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 08-26-2009, 01:37 PM
  2. "Check CD" or "error reading cd"
    By pontiacprincess in forum Audio, Security & Visual Electronics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-04-2009, 08:22 PM
  3. Powrtuner website now "mostly" open to all members
    By JEFFSGTP in forum Site/Club News
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 01-23-2009, 09:41 PM
  4. "Cutting the intake box" on a GTP
    By Freebeer187 in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-20-2008, 12:41 PM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •