Thread: isn't this supposed to be dry??

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 43
  1. #1 isn't this supposed to be dry?? 
    Donating Users kind153's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Pittsburg, KS
    Posts
    243
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Masters,

    After smelling something burning one day, I opened the hood and noticed a light smoke.. and it seems to be coming from somewhere here.. I'm inclined to think that the area is supposed to be dry? and whatever is leaking, that's the source of the smoke? What went wrong??

    98 GT..series II.

    Thanks in advance,
    MK

    download.jpg
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: isn't this supposed to be dry?? 
    Turbo is the way to go. BillBoost37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    W Spfld
    Posts
    26,833
    Thanks (Received)
    53
    Likes (Received)
    90
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    That would be your front valve cover gasket. If you've never had the warranty free cover gasket replaced. Stop by your local dealer to see if it's been done to your car.
    I drink..so consider that when reading my posts.

    2010 Audi A6 Dual IC's
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: isn't this supposed to be dry?? 
    Donating Users kind153's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Pittsburg, KS
    Posts
    243
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BillBoost37 View Post
    That would be your front valve cover gasket. If you've never had the warranty free cover gasket replaced. Stop by your local dealer to see if it's been done to your car.
    front valve cover gasket..got it!
    warranty free cover gasket replacement? please do tell more!

    edit: quick googling returns about the valve cover gasket recall. I remember the recall, on this car, was about putting plastic retainers.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: isn't this supposed to be dry?? 
    Turbo is the way to go. BillBoost37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    W Spfld
    Posts
    26,833
    Thanks (Received)
    53
    Likes (Received)
    90
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    They do retainers, remove the heat shield on the exhaust and the valve cover gasket.
    I drink..so consider that when reading my posts.

    2010 Audi A6 Dual IC's
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: isn't this supposed to be dry?? 
    I live here. TLSheff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Durant, Oklahoma, United States
    Posts
    8,033
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    LOL... While your googling... look for Grand Prix Engine Fire. That is what the recall is in place to prevent.

    FIX IT NOW!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by AmericanSoldier View Post
    ...not scanning/monitoring your motor is like bangin a hooker and you just HOPE your not infected.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: isn't this supposed to be dry?? 
    GTP Level Member Impala131's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    709
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Personally, I'd change both the valve cover gaskets. I did it while I already had the engine apart for the LIM gaskets. The front had been replaced under warranty, but the rear was in absolutely crap shape and there was signs that oil had leaked there at one point. I bought the fel-pro kit, replaced both gaskets, and am very happy with the results.

    But yes, at the very least, couldn't hurt to have the dealer do the front, if you'd rather not dive into it yourself.
    2003 Grand Prix GTP.... the journey begins again....
    E85 Self Tune with HPT, 80# Injectors, Gen V 3.4 pulley, SD Headers, AL605 Plugs
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: isn't this supposed to be dry?? 
    GrandPrix Junkie
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    4,732
    Thanks (Received)
    18
    Likes (Received)
    76
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    If you do the gaskets yourself don't forget to install new bolt grommets as well, or it will leak again.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: isn't this supposed to be dry?? 
    GTP Level Member Impala131's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    709
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by FordMan77 View Post
    If you do the gaskets yourself don't forget to install new bolt grommets as well, or it will leak again.
    Absolutely agreed, if you get the Fel-pro kit from rockauto, it will include these bolt grommets as well.
    2003 Grand Prix GTP.... the journey begins again....
    E85 Self Tune with HPT, 80# Injectors, Gen V 3.4 pulley, SD Headers, AL605 Plugs
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: isn't this supposed to be dry?? 
    Donating Users kind153's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Pittsburg, KS
    Posts
    243
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    ok..now i'm scared and confused. Is it covered under the recall? I get conflicting results while googling.. mine is not supercharged..(vin K)
    Any supporting evidences I could take it to the dealer who did put the retainers and say I need the gaskets replaced as well?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: isn't this supposed to be dry?? 
    Donating Users kind153's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Pittsburg, KS
    Posts
    243
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    ok.. I found these:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    NHTSA Recall Campaign Number: 09V116000

    Component: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING

    Details: GENERAL MOTORS IS RECALLING 1,497,516 MY 1997-2003 BUICK REGAL, MY 1998-2003 CHEVROLET LUMINA, MONTE CARLO AND IMPALA, MY 1998-1999 OLDSMOBILE INTRIGUE, MY 1997-2003 PONTIAC GRAND PRIX VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH A 3.8L V6 NATURALLY ASPIRATED ENGINE. SOME OF THESE VEHICLES HAVE A CONDITION IN WHICH DROPS OF ENGINE OIL MAY BE DEPOSITED ON THE EXHAUST MANIFOLD THROUGH HARD BRAKING.


    Consequence: IF THE MANIFOLD IS HOT ENOUGH AND THE OIL RUNS BELOW THE HEAT SHIELD, IT MAY IGNITE INTO A SMALL FLAME AND MAY SPREAD TO THE PLASTIC SPARK PLUG WIRE CHANNEL AND BEYOND INCREASING THE RISK OF AN ENGINE COMPARTMENT FIRE.


    Corrective Action: DEALERS WILL REMOVE THE SPARK PLUG WIRE RETENTION CHANNEL AT THE FRONT OF ENGINE AND INSTALL TWO NEW SPARK PLUG WIRE RETAINERS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL IS EXPECTED TO BEGIN DURING MAY 2009. OWNERS MAY CONTACT CHEVROLET AT 1-800-630-2438, OLDSMOBILE AT 1-800-630-6537, AND PONTIAC AT 1-800-620-7668 OR HTTP://WWW.PONTIAC.COM OR HTTP:WWW.GMOWNERCENTER.COM.


    Units Potentially Affected: 1497516


    Recall Initiated By: ODI
    Date added to NHTSA database: 04/08/2009

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    NHTSA Recall Campaign Number: 08V118000


    Component: ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING


    Details: GM IS RECALLING 207,542 MY 1997-2003 BUICK REGAL AND PONTIAC GRAND PRIX VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH A 3.8L SUPERCHARGED V-6 ENGINE. THESE VEHICLES HAVE HIGHER FRONT ROCKER COVER GASKET TEMPERATURES, CREATING THE POTENTIAL FOR EARLIER DEGRADATION OF THE FRONT ROCKER COVER GASKET AND EVENTUAL OIL SEEPAGE.


    Consequence: CERTAIN UNDERHOOD FIRES MAY BE CAUSED BY DROPS OF ENGINE OIL, FROM SEEPAGE OR SPILLAGE, BEING DEPOSITED ON THE EXHAUST MANIFOLD THROUGH HARD BRAKING. IF THE MANIFOLD IS HOT ENOUGH AND THE OIL RUNS BELOW THE HEAT SHIELD, IT MAY IGNITE INTO A SMALL FLAME AND, IN SOME INSTANCES, THE FIRE MAY SPREAD TO THE PLASTIC SPARK PLUG WIRE CHANNEL AND BEYOND.


    Corrective Action: DEALERS WILL INSTALL A NEW FRONT (LEFT) ROCKER COVER GASKET WITH AN IMPROVED DESIGN FROM THE ORIGINAL GASKET AND REPLACE THE SPARK PLUG WIRE CHANNEL WITH NEW RETAINERS. DUE TO PARTS AVAILABILITY, OWNER NOTIFICATION LETTERS WILL BE MAILED IN TWO PHASES. THE CUSTOMER LETTERS FOR THE 1997-2000 MODEL YEAR VEHICLES WILL BE MAILED ON APRIL 28, 2008. GM WILL ADVISE AS TO WHEN THE OWNER LETTERS FOR THE 2001-2003 MODEL YEAR VEHICLES WILL BE MAILED. UNTIL SUFFICIENT PARTS BECOME AVAILABLE, GM STRONGLY RECOMMENDS THAT OWNERS OBSERVE THE FOLLOWING IMPORTANT PRECAUTIONS (1) THEY STRONGLY RECOMMEND THAT OWNERS DO NOT PARK THEIR VEHICLE IN A GARAGE, CAR PORT, OR OTHER STRUCTURE; (2) IF OWNERS NOTICE A BURNING ODOR, THEY SHOULD HAVE THEIR DEALER INSPECT THE VEHICLE. THE DEALER WILL INSPECT THE VEHICLE WITHOUT CHARGE; (3) USE PREMIUM FUEL (91 OCTANE OR HIGHER) IN THE VEHICLE AS RECOMMENDED IN THE VEHICLES OWNER MANUAL. OWNERS MAY CONTACT BUICK AT 1-866-608-8080 OR PONTIAC AT 1-800-620-7668, OR THROUGH THEIR WEBSITE AT HTTP://WWW.GMOWNERCENTER.COM .


    Units Potentially Affected: 207542


    Recall Initiated By: ODI
    Date added to NHTSA database: 03/12/2008
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: isn't this supposed to be dry?? 
    Killa Bee Scottydoggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    39,997
    Thanks (Received)
    63
    Likes (Received)
    166
    Dislikes (Received)
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by kind153 View Post
    ok..now i'm scared and confused. Is it covered under the recall? I get conflicting results while googling.. mine is not supercharged..(vin K)
    Any supporting evidences I could take it to the dealer who did put the retainers and say I need the gaskets replaced as well?

    if your not the original owner of the car, call any gm dealer, with your vin # in hand, ask them if they can tell you if the valve cover recall has been done on your car yet. they will know by the vin. if they say its never been done they will make an appointment with you.

    not sure about your state, but the vin # is on my NJ registration card. or your title.


    if your on your own the front is easy to change, the grommets are just a rubber piece that sits in the valve cover bolt hole, then the bolt goes through the grommets hole, its all easy to see after you take off the valve cover.. dont worry. and torqued to 98 inch pounds. ( i think, double check that) you need a small torque wrench. if you over tighten the cover you will crush the new gasket and it will leak like mine is. (yes i over tightened mine.) <<<<sucks.

    98 Buick Regal GS, F body brakes, Caddy STS wheels, tinted tails L36 bottom end, lightly ported heads, 1.95 roller rockers, headers, gen 5 N* 3.0 pulley, FSIC, 42 lb injectors, a BrandonHall rebuilt trans, DHP tuned and AEM water/Meth injection https://goo.gl/gpV5kW
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: isn't this supposed to be dry?? 
    Donating Users kind153's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Pittsburg, KS
    Posts
    243
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    The previous owner received the letter just before selling the car and gave me the letter. I took the car to the dealer with the letter, and that was when they put the retainers...not the gasket. (??)


    also, is this something I can delay to fix? will it get worse? what's the risk of leaving it as is?
    Last edited by kind153; 05-24-2012 at 07:33 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: isn't this supposed to be dry?? 
    GrandPrix Junkie
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    4,732
    Thanks (Received)
    18
    Likes (Received)
    76
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I've been getting the recall notice on my 00 GT for a while now, and I'm the 2nd owner. Since I've already done both covers and grommets I haven't taken it in, and won't. My motor is actually dry (if you can beleive a 3800 can be dry, lol).

    Some dealers won't replace the gasket, just the wire guide.

    I wouldn't put it off personally. It would suck to loose my car to a fire that $35 worth of parts and a few hours of my time could have stopped, ya know?

    If you don't own a inch pounds torque wrench then just find an online converter that will convert in/lb to ft/lb, as most people own a ft/lb wrench.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: isn't this supposed to be dry?? 
    Turbo is the way to go. BillBoost37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    W Spfld
    Posts
    26,833
    Thanks (Received)
    53
    Likes (Received)
    90
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    It's worth looking into. Maybe the notice you got was only the retainer notice. Keep in mind it costs nothing to ask the question. You had one recall, not two to your knowledge and there are two.

    Letting this go, what happens is oil and crud builds up under the heat shield and that starts on fire. If you enjoy roasting marshmallows on your GP as it goes up in flames, I'd say you can definately wait. If you like your car and want to keep it, I'd move on this instead of putting it off. We can't say for sure if yours will have a fire or not, but it's common enough that we don't suggest waiting to find out.

    FM77: Did you know that in many cases GM will reimburse you for the job if you had it done outside of the recall program. All they usually need is the receipt for the gasket/labor.
    I drink..so consider that when reading my posts.

    2010 Audi A6 Dual IC's
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: isn't this supposed to be dry?? 
    Donating Users kind153's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Pittsburg, KS
    Posts
    243
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BillBoost37 View Post
    It's worth looking into. Maybe the notice you got was only the retainer notice. Keep in mind it costs nothing to ask the question. You had one recall, not two to your knowledge and there are two.
    there are two?? I see one for each engine..supercharged and n/a.


    marshmallow mod, great!
    oh well, looks like I will have to get it done in either way.



    Quote Originally Posted by FordMan77 View Post
    I've been getting the recall notice on my 00 GT for a while now, and I'm the 2nd owner. Since I've already done both covers and grommets I haven't taken it in, and won't. My motor is actually dry (if you can beleive a 3800 can be dry, lol).
    Your letter.. does it mention what they will do? I remember my letter said something about the retainer..but didn't mention anything about gaskets.

    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: isn't this supposed to be dry?? 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    You own a GT, you will not get a valve cover gasket.

    In fact, they only replace the front gasket and leave the rear gasket and all of the grommets, but only if its supercharged.

    Just go out and buy the gaskets and grommets yourself and pop 'em on.

    You're not covered by the recall anyways.

    And the fire thing can also be fuel injector disconnects that fail over time.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: isn't this supposed to be dry?? 
    Donating Users kind153's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Pittsburg, KS
    Posts
    243
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by matt5112 View Post
    You own a GT, you will not get a valve cover gasket.

    In fact, they only replace the front gasket and leave the rear gasket and all of the grommets, but only if its supercharged.

    Just go out and buy the gaskets and grommets yourself and pop 'em on.

    You're not covered by the recall anyways.

    And the fire thing can also be fuel injector disconnects that fail over time.
    this makes more sense. it's also how i read those recalls. I wonder how hard it'd be to replace the gaskets and gromets??
    Last edited by kind153; 05-25-2012 at 01:45 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: isn't this supposed to be dry?? 
    Killa Bee Scottydoggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    39,997
    Thanks (Received)
    63
    Likes (Received)
    166
    Dislikes (Received)
    5
    not hard at all, you remove your belt, the dog bones, and then the icm/coil bracket from the side of the head, and you have full access to the cover.

    if its your first time, maybe a hour to complete, tops, i never did them till i did mine and spent about 1.5 hours for front and back, back has a few more things to remove to get a clear shot at it. front was real easy. was done in less than 30 minutes.

    just remember to clean up the head, where the cover sits, and the cover where the gasket sits inside it real good. brake cleaner works good, i also cleaned up the whole inside of my cover, it was kinda nasty.

    98 Buick Regal GS, F body brakes, Caddy STS wheels, tinted tails L36 bottom end, lightly ported heads, 1.95 roller rockers, headers, gen 5 N* 3.0 pulley, FSIC, 42 lb injectors, a BrandonHall rebuilt trans, DHP tuned and AEM water/Meth injection https://goo.gl/gpV5kW
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19 Re: isn't this supposed to be dry?? 
    SE Level Member GrandPrixLover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Eagan, MN
    Posts
    19
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I've received that letter plenty of times, third owner of my grand prix. Mine never mentioned anything about the gaskets or the retainers, only a engine fire is possible.
    I agree with fordman, just research it if you dont know about the covers and do the project yourself (much more satisfaction out of doing it yourself).
    I did mine a few months ago and have had no oil leaking from them.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20 Re: isn't this supposed to be dry?? 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    If you plan on this, you might as well make an event out of it and go for the LIM gaskets as well.

    You'll have to remove the belt tensioner which means the coolant elbows will probably break and need replacing (should be replaced once removed anyways).

    However if you're drain some coolant, just make an event out of it.

    LIM gasket with grommets, coolant elbows, new UIM, coolant flush and an oil change.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. what is this part and what is it supposed to sit like?
    By aeidian in forum 1997-2007 4 speed Automatic (4T65E) (4T65E-HD)
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-01-2010, 03:20 PM
  2. is this how it's supposed to sound?
    By Juanmiguel in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-06-2010, 11:03 AM
  3. How hot are l67 engines supposed to get?
    By GOTIT4CHEAP16 in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-12-2010, 09:02 PM
  4. Is a pulley supposed to be here?
    By black98gt in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-14-2009, 05:42 PM
  5. I thought the Monsoon Stereo was supposed to have 9 speakers?
    By Crackpipe in forum Audio, Security & Visual Electronics
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 02-27-2009, 06:12 PM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •