Thread: 3" DP = no lowend myth...

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1 3" DP = no lowend myth... 
    GTP Level Member 99GT2dr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cibolo, TX
    Posts
    545
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    To all that say this, I say it's a load of crap. My GT has home-grown PEM's, 3" off road DP, ported LIM, and an L67 TB. That should be a perfect recipe for a weak low-end NA 3800 in some peoples opinion.

    The opposite is true, however. Breaking loose anywhere between 0 and 25 is pretty easy. Of course, launching sucks at the track The car does seem to like 3k RPM's though, I will say that. But she breathes pretty good with what I have done.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Elk Grove Village, IL
    Posts
    222
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I also felt good lowend with a 3"DP while top end gained as well. I say the myth has been busted.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Transmission Expert Trannyman95's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Fort Wayne, IN
    Posts
    1,858
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I agree with you guys that once your IN the throttle hard it will make power. What most people complain about, and I can vouge for this on the supercharged engines, is that in town driving in light throttle situations the car may feel a bit more lazy. Most guys that install headers notices this right off the bat if they do a lot of stop and go driving where you arent using much throttle and the responce falls off. WOT is a different story and the power gain is usually worth the offset down low during normal driving. Some people are just more picky than others, I have heard from a lot of people locally about how they didnt like the loss in low end driving around, but everyone is going to have their own opinions.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    GTP Level Member 99GT2dr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cibolo, TX
    Posts
    545
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    is that in town driving in light throttle situations the car may feel a bit more lazy.
    I may not be noticing this because my cruise timing is bumped up a lot. With stock timing, I imagine light throttle would be lacking in power. But who are we kidding? Nobody modded drives around at "light throttle" anyways.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    SE Level Member Coogles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    70
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 99GT2dr View Post
    I may not be noticing this because my cruise timing is bumped up a lot. With stock timing, I imagine light throttle would be lacking in power. But who are we kidding? Nobody modded drives around at "light throttle" anyways.
    Um, I do? I certainly don't feel the need to get into boost from every stoplight.

    I will say, though, that when I was running non-boosted I didn't notice much of a reduction in off-idle response when I went with a 3" Random Tech downpipe and converter. My first "setup" was the Wizair, UD pulleys, and U-Bend removal with a SLP Loudmouth cat-back. Now THAT suffered off the line and I didn't gain jack up top to make up for it, really.

    I went back to a stock cat-back and then went to the downpipe and dropped two tenths while picking up 1.5mph over a downpipe that already had the u-bend gone. With stock mani's and cat-back I didn't notice any low-end loss, but you could probably credit the stock exhaust for that. I think with a 3" downpipe and open 2.5" exhaust that off-idle response would suffer.

    It DEFINITELY did once I went with TOG's. They absolutely killed any feeling of torque that the L36 had and I actually got slower by a tenth. Even with the M90 now it still feels a bit soft on the bottom end. Ah well.
    Forest Green 1998 GTP Sedan - SOLD
    VS, 3.2, TOG, GMPP Suspension, 3EP Tune
    13.179 @ 106.57 w/2.005 60'
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    SS-DD Level Member IndeedSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    St Louis MO
    Posts
    1,900
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I've experienced the lack of lowend torque on both an 05 3.8 NA and my 04 3.8 SC when opening up the exhaust. However as, Dave has pointed out this is low throttle positions, low rpm situations.
    04 Indy SS build #972 - Traded
    2010 Camaro SS LS3
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    GTP Level Member 99GT2dr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cibolo, TX
    Posts
    545
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Are you guys tuning your car yourself, or are you just running a canned PCM? A lot of people that complain of the lowend loss also don't tune their cars, just bolt this or that on and expect more power.

    Going from stock to a 3" DP and PEM's or headers definately requires a tune, that's a BIG jump over the stock setup.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    SE Level Member Coogles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    70
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 99GT2dr View Post
    Are you guys tuning your car yourself, or are you just running a canned PCM? A lot of people that complain of the lowend loss also don't tune their cars, just bolt this or that on and expect more power.

    Going from stock to a 3" DP and PEM's or headers definately requires a tune, that's a BIG jump over the stock setup.
    I was merely running a canned DHP 1.0 at the time.
    Forest Green 1998 GTP Sedan - SOLD
    VS, 3.2, TOG, GMPP Suspension, 3EP Tune
    13.179 @ 106.57 w/2.005 60'
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    132
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    ooops thought we where talking l67 for a sec
    Reply With Quote  
     

Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •