Thread: BCB vs BRB

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1 BCB vs BRB 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Lakeville, IN
    Posts
    11
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    2000 GP GT 4d 182k - Perfect engine, body, chassis etc.


    What exactly is the difference between the BCB transmission submodel and the BRB? I am looking at replacing my transaxle due to first gear takeoff issues (wish it was a simple fix, otherwise the trans is PERFECT) anyhow... I am finding them all over but I have NO id tag on my trans now to tell if I am running a BCB or a BRB and I have no idea where to go from here. Anyone have any luck with the solenoid changes?

    Problems are:

    Once warm it slips from a stop (shuddering as if though grabbing and releasing the clutches), however once you're in second it's fine and if you stab the gas it'll downshift into first and not slip a bit. This is resolved with no shudder or slam by manually selecting first gear then going to drive after it winds out)

    Sometimes when merging into traffic and easing on the gas the tach will bounce like the Torque converter is locking and unlocking - this is resolved by applying more pedal to unlock the converter OR letting up so it isn't in that almost ready to unlock stage. Otherwise shifts are GREAT.
    Last edited by Mooserini; 10-28-2010 at 04:05 PM. Reason: details
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: BCB vs BRB 
    Donating Users Lawngoose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Outer Space
    Posts
    1,250
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mooserini View Post
    What exactly is the difference between the BCB transmission submodel and the BRB? I am looking at replacing my transaxle due to first gear takeoff issues (wish it was a simple fix, otherwise the trans is PERFECT) anyhow... I am finding them all over but I have NO id tag on my trans now to tell if I am running a BCB or a BRB and I have no idea where to go from here. Anyone have any luck with the solenoid changes?

    Problems are:

    Once warm it slips from a stop (shuddering as if though grabbing and releasing the clutches), however once you're in second it's fine and if you stab the gas it'll downshift into first and not slip a bit.

    Sometimes when merging into traffic and easing on the gas the tach will bounce like the Torque converter is locking and unlocking - this is resolved by applying more pedal to unlock the converter OR letting up so it isn't in that almost ready to unlock stage. Otherwise shifts are GREAT.
    4T65eHD infomation
    02 GTP 13.6 @ 100mph - SOLD
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: BCB vs BRB 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Lakeville, IN
    Posts
    11
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lawngoose View Post
    Don't see a BRB in there anywhere :/
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: BCB vs BRB 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    i have no idea what youre talking about with BCB or BRB...

    your transmission name is the 4t65-e.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: BCB vs BRB 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Lakeville, IN
    Posts
    11
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bio248 View Post
    i have no idea what youre talking about with BCB or BRB...

    your transmission name is the 4t65-e.
    there are different configurations of the 4t65(hd) transaxles and I want to find one that will work without PCM changes and I'd also like input on the possibility of just fixing mine. I have the option according to car-part.com interchange of the BRB or BCB trans.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: BCB vs BRB 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Lakeville, IN
    Posts
    11
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I will be patient here, I am no expert but I already have found out the information I need to get this car to A+ shape. I cannot justify junking it as it looks perfect, runs perfect and the interior looks showroom. I just want my tranny to stop acting like paris hilton.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: BCB vs BRB 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    there are two configurations, the 4t65-e and the 4t65-e-hd. you have a GT so you dont have the HD transmission. so long as you pull it from another grand prix GT or SE (NOT A 97) then its plug and play.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: BCB vs BRB 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Lakeville, IN
    Posts
    11
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bio248 View Post
    there are two configurations, the 4t65-e and the 4t65-e-hd. you have a GT so you dont have the HD transmission. so long as you pull it from another grand prix GT or SE (NOT A 97) then its plug and play.
    I realize I don't have the HD as I don't have a supercharger. So either the BCB or the BRB would work (same final ratio etc) since they were both used in the non supercharged 3800 grand prix that year?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: BCB vs BRB 
    GTX Level Member noreasonwhyy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    994
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    you'll be fine with any trans from a n/a w-body 98-02.

    can you link me to something that states what the bcb and brb are and differences between them? never heard of them

    97 GT - slow, rusty
    93 CTD - more slow, less rust
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: BCB vs BRB 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Lakeville, IN
    Posts
    11
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by noreasonwhyy View Post
    you'll be fine with any trans from a n/a w-body 98-02.

    can you link me to something that states what the bcb and brb are and differences between them? never heard of them
    I wish I knew, that's what I am looking for. The link that was posed above shows the BCB in the different tables, but no sign of BRB. When I search car-part.com for local salvage yards it asks me which one. When I choose BRB it seems like there are a wider variety of vehicles using that, but the BCB seems to be 2000 model year specific with various vans and even the 3.4 using it... which according to that table doesn't make sense.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: BCB vs BRB 
    Donating Users 16MustangVet's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sh1t hole Afghanistan Currently
    Posts
    5,418
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Do you guys know how many different GM FWD configurations their are for gear ratios vavle bodies, TQ convertors ect?? Hes on the right track by looking for the same code on the transmission ID tag. Id reccomend emailing Triple Edge Performance they know everything! Yes you COULD find another trans from the same type of car but it will have a major impact on the ease of finding a matching one if you know what the trans ID tag is compatible with.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: BCB vs BRB 
    Its not that small is it? DaytonaGTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Michigantown, IN
    Posts
    603
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    ^^^x2... triple edge will know. if not then we'll all die...lol

    2000 Daytona GTP(aka the slow fwd GTO)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: BCB vs BRB 
    GT Level Member torq455's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    312
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I googled 4T65E brb and got a lot of Chevy Venture info. Then the bcb gives me Venture, Silhouette and Montana info. Those iirc. have a FDR of 3.69.
    2002 GTP: K&N, 3.2 pulley, flipped mounts. ZZP SS headers, 180 stat, NGK TR6's, MSD wires, Reptile ported TB, ported S/C, ported LIM, Intense Stage II heads with larger Manley severe duty SS valves, Yella Terra 1.9 full roller rockers, LS6 springs, Racetronix fuel pump re-wire, Oil pressure "kit", JMB FWI. Mustang dynoed at 240 WHP, 272 WTQ.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: BCB vs BRB 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Lakeville, IN
    Posts
    11
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by torq455 View Post
    I googled 4T65E brb and got a lot of Chevy Venture info. Then the bcb gives me Venture, Silhouette and Montana info. Those iirc. have a FDR of 3.69.
    I am somewhat of a tard when it comes to tranny's... so what is iirc? Ty in advance.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: BCB vs BRB 
     

  16. #16 Re: BCB vs BRB 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Well....

    GM 4T60-E transmission - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    M15 — 245 mm (9.6 in) torque converter
    MN3 — 258 mm (10.2 in) torque converter
    MN7 — 258 mm (10.2 in) torque converter and heavy-duty gearbox (see 4T65E-HD)
    MD7 — 245 mm (9.6 in) torque converter (Chinese version)
    M76 — 245 mm (9.6 in) torque converter (with all-wheel drive capability)

    You should find codes like that.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: BCB vs BRB 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Lakeville, IN
    Posts
    11
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by matt5112 View Post
    Well....

    GM 4T60-E transmission - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    M15 — 245 mm (9.6 in) torque converter
    MN3 — 258 mm (10.2 in) torque converter
    MN7 — 258 mm (10.2 in) torque converter and heavy-duty gearbox (see 4T65E-HD)
    MD7 — 245 mm (9.6 in) torque converter (Chinese version)
    M76 — 245 mm (9.6 in) torque converter (with all-wheel drive capability)

    You should find codes like that.
    That still doesn't tell you the final drive ratio and what not. I am going to call that trannyguy and see what he has to say. Thanks for your help though!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: BCB vs BRB 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    If you check application it does tell you based on the one of those codes.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19 Re: BCB vs BRB 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Lakeville, IN
    Posts
    11
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by matt5112 View Post
    If you check application it does tell you based on the one of those codes.
    I totally agree, but there's a subcode also. bcb and brb... apparently two different final drive ratios. I suppose I'll have to do this the old fashioned way and make it rear wheel drive with a turbo 350 tranny and a 350 v8 lol
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20 Re: BCB vs BRB 
    GTX Level Member noreasonwhyy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    994
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    The Grand Prix GT and SE with the L36 engines have a weaker transmission than the GTP with the L67 3800 SC, but it's not a 4T60e, except in some 1997 GTs, which is really an oddball year. All '98 and newer L36 engines have a 4T65e, but they have the light duty version, RPO code M15. All L67 engines have the 4T65e HD, meaning heavy duty (RPO code MN7). The differences? The MN7 version have a larger differential, and due to the larger differential, the output shaft on a MN7 is about 1/4 inch longer. The MN7 also have a stronger input sun gear, and have roller bearings on the differential housing whereas the light duty 4T65e have a bushing instead. There may be some other minor differences inside, but these are the major ones. Can you convert a light duty trans to a MN7? Yes, but those pieces are a bit pricey.

    By the way, the 4T60e (RPO code M13) is a much lighter duty transmission than any 4T65e.(that's in most '97 GTs).
    ...
    All 4T65e transaxles actually have the same 3.29:1 ratio differential. Yes, we know that the GT has a final drive of 3.29:1 and the GTP has a 2.93:1 final drive (in fact, all L67 3800 SC engines, and hence MN7 transmissions, have this 2.93:1 final drive.

    97 GT - slow, rusty
    93 CTD - more slow, less rust
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •