Thread: Power log VS Headers

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22
  1. #1 Power log VS Headers 
    Donating Users Taz Magister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    2,153
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Alright so I'm about to have so major mods done to my car, Atleast major compared to what I've done so far. Someone told me that I should go with headers with these mods but I don't know for sure.

    Car Info
    2002 grand prix gt
    67600 miles

    Current Mods
    k&n drop in filter
    NGK Iridium plugs
    ZZP 2.5'' bolt in downpipe with high flow Cat
    Poly Motor mounts (not really engine realated)
    Strut tower brace (also not related)

    Parts ready to go on
    GT1 camshaft from Comp cams
    Hv3 High velocity intake insert
    180 thermostat

    Parts that I have for cam install
    Timing chain dampener
    12 COMP CAMS reuseable rocker bolts
    GM oem aluminum intake gasket set
    front cover gasket
    ARP assembly lube
    valve cover gaskets
    crank bolt
    cam bolt
    Factory replacement timing chain
    new intake gasket (for the Hv3)

    So my question, Is my downpipe enough for the cam untill I get power logs or headers? and are power logs better for my car than headers? Because Ive heard on N/A cars headers result in a loss in low end torque and thats kind of the only thing these cars got going for them plus im not going to be driving over 100 I dont need high end power I need the low end stuff for rocketing in between lights.

    Also any input on perfourming this install and things I might still need to do so. Was thinking of possibly going to PRJ but maybe ill do it myself, or maybe Ill keep buying parts and just do a complete rebuild in the summer.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: Power log VS Headers 
    GT Level Member zipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Shelby, MI
    Posts
    153
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    The GT1 cam is going to make you lose more low end then you would if you installed headers. If you don't care about going with boost (although I recommend getting boosted), then you should get a good set of rockers instead.

    I went the NA route and I had the GT1 cam installed for a little over 2 years with a stock d/p with no problems. When I finally got my TOG headers installed it took my from a 14.7 to a 14.4 1/4 mile.

    Headers are great for a cam or a rocker build, but I don't recommend going the NA way. It was a lot of money for very little gains.

    NA dyno: 222whp
    Novi 1000 dyno: 348whp
    Novi 2000 dyno: 372whp Best 1/4 mile: 13.2634@105.12mph
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: Power log VS Headers 
    Donating Users Taz Magister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    2,153
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    would it be possible to do a top swap along with this cam?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: Power log VS Headers 
    resident snitch gtpinsc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    sumter,south carolina
    Posts
    6,432
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    plog will give u more torque... headers will put your powerband in the higher RPM ranges.. id go plog. or either keep stock manifold.

    02 GTP with mods 05 GP for DD
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperSport View Post
    The majority of the people here are potheads who want to buy good condition parts at junkyard prices.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: Power log VS Headers 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    The GT1 cam isn't a blower cam...it has a powerband for a N/A car...can you use it with a Top Swap? Sure. Will it make more power than a stock cam? Yeah...but it isn't recommended...XP or S1X are great cams for Top Swaps...common and very proven.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: Power log VS Headers 
    Donating Users Taz Magister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    2,153
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    idk im going back and forth now because I hear diffrent things from everyone the only reason I ask is because I already have this cam and now I got someone telling me N/A is a waste of time and I think im just going to find a used engine off craigs list and take my time and build a completly new engine for my car idk this is starting to upset me lol arghhh
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: Power log VS Headers 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    N/A = reliable for the better part...if your boosted and don't have a way of tuning...it isn't safe on ANY platform.

    If you have a GT1 cam...throw it in...and enjoy it...that with headers and an HV3...will for sure help things out and make a TON of difference from what you have now...prolly close to 40-50 crank horse to what you have now.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: Power log VS Headers 
    GTP Level Member FriboRage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    915
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Received)
    13
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    So earlier he said that plog will make more torque than headers on the low rpms.

    Are headers really a good idea for NA, or are they more suited for a blower?
    Do plogs make better power on NA than a header set up would?

    Do they still sell p logs? I remember reading somewhere that they're not available anymore.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: Power log VS Headers 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    ZZP sells PLOG's.

    Here is the deal...your not losing power with ANY exhaust mod. It just shifts the powerband. Headers move your powerband up to the higher RPM range...the PLOG helps keep the lower end torque feeling with the style of the factory manifold.

    I'd put headers on anything...I'd even put a header on a Cobalt...I just don't care to since it is a DD.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: Power log VS Headers 
    GPFs Sexy Ginger. SilvaMan61's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    3,619
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    cobalt

    cant go wrong with headers
    SMGPFC Member #9
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: Power log VS Headers 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    You know you want the every bit of 44 mpg's. Jealous.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: Power log VS Headers 
    GPFs Sexy Ginger. SilvaMan61's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    3,619
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    yeah but i value my nut sack too highly
    SMGPFC Member #9
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: Power log VS Headers 
    GTP Level Member FriboRage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    915
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Received)
    13
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    So I guess here's the meat of my question...

    I have a base 08, no mods... 200hp

    So let's say Im going to throw on..
    CAI
    HV3
    ER Rockers

    About how much power would you say can I net from this alone, without a tune... and then with a tune?

    ...and

    So then if I put on headers or plog, which will make more power?

    Im guessing the headers will be better, but in that case, why have the plog as an option at all if headers are more effective? Just cheaper?

    Sorry if Im being really stupid here, trying to get a good understanding
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: Power log VS Headers 
    resident snitch gtpinsc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    sumter,south carolina
    Posts
    6,432
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SilvaMan61 View Post
    yeah but i value my nut sack too highly
    damnnnnnnnnnnnnn

    i cant say much... his balt is prob faster than my lude.

    02 GTP with mods 05 GP for DD
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperSport View Post
    The majority of the people here are potheads who want to buy good condition parts at junkyard prices.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: Power log VS Headers 
    GT Level Member zipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Shelby, MI
    Posts
    153
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Friborage, you're probably looking at 175whp with that setup (give or take 5whp). Headers are much better then the plog, especially if you continue modifying the car. If you look above I explained how I went from a 14.7 to a 14.4 with headers.

    NA dyno: 222whp
    Novi 1000 dyno: 348whp
    Novi 2000 dyno: 372whp Best 1/4 mile: 13.2634@105.12mph
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: Power log VS Headers 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by FriboRage View Post
    So I guess here's the meat of my question...

    I have a base 08, no mods... 200hp

    So let's say Im going to throw on..
    CAI
    HV3
    ER Rockers

    About how much power would you say can I net from this alone, without a tune... and then with a tune?

    ...and

    So then if I put on headers or plog, which will make more power?

    Im guessing the headers will be better, but in that case, why have the plog as an option at all if headers are more effective? Just cheaper?

    Sorry if Im being really stupid here, trying to get a good understanding
    Understanding?

    Read yo...

    http://www.grandprixforums.net/safel...car-17482.html
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: Power log VS Headers 
    Donating Users Taz Magister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    2,153
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    alright I think Im just going to throw the parts I have in there and stop with the mods there keep it as my dd maybe go find a cheap gp in th junk yard or some where on the cheap and make a full out monster strip out the interior and all the luxurys and build a massive engine or even better just keep the car I have now and when I buy my first new car turn make my old one the monster these our all just dreams though guess I'll see in a few years....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: Power log VS Headers 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    131
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by FriboRage View Post
    So I guess here's the meat of my question...

    I have a base 08, no mods... 200hp

    So let's say Im going to throw on..
    CAI
    HV3
    ER Rockers

    About how much power would you say can I net from this alone, without a tune... and then with a tune?

    ...and

    So then if I put on headers or plog, which will make more power?

    Im guessing the headers will be better, but in that case, why have the plog as an option at all if headers are more effective? Just cheaper?

    Sorry if Im being really stupid here, trying to get a good understanding
    Headers would most likely be better for that setup. Either way you are going to want a good custom tune, that helps a lot. I'm choosing to go the PLOG & 2.5" downpipe route because it is easier to install (For ME) and wont see any huge differences. Sure - headers might benefit more but hopefully not too much.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19 Re: Power log VS Headers 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    If you think headers are going to be a non-noticeable gain over a PLOG/2.5" DP setup...you might wanna re-check that.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20 Re: Power log VS Headers 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    131
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    On a N/A car.. I bet you won't feel a seat in the pants difference but I bet you'd see a small difference in Quarter mile & HP
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. power steering. feels like i have "half" the power
    By colindunn in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 07-23-2011, 09:15 AM
  2. HELP!! how do you power up power seat?
    By nemesis in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-14-2010, 11:56 PM
  3. S&S headers
    By gotboost3 in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-18-2009, 05:45 PM
  4. XS Power Headers Vs. SSAC Headers
    By 04CompG in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-02-2008, 01:12 PM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •