Thread: Is the 3100 engine ****?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24
  1. #1 Is the 3100 engine ****? 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Cedar Rapids, Iowa
    Posts
    255
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Chats
    4
    From what I'm seeing around here I'm kind of getting that impression. I'm thinking about buying an older 95 or 96 GP with the 3100 in it because they're pretty cheap on Craigslist and I just kind of want a cheap car from now until I graduate in a couple years. I don't mind doing work on it every once and a while and would expect to on an older car but I don't want to buy something that is going to be a constant headache.

    Which brings me back to my original question, are these engines **** or should I be okay on one that has 140-150k miles?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: Is the 3100 engine ****? 
    Turbo is the way to go. Fivefingerdeathpunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    21,030
    Thanks (Received)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    45
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Chats
    83662
    They run a long time if cared for, biggest problems are intake gaskets and head gaskets.

    Most of the time once they have been fixed the motors still pretty solid. I see them all the time with well over 200k miles but they likely had at least one major repair in it's lifetime.

    You can find a 3.8 grand prix of a newer year for so cheap now, I not sure I'd even consider going older and getting one with a 3.1.

    SMGPFC Member #1
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: Is the 3100 engine ****? 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Cedar Rapids, Iowa
    Posts
    255
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Chats
    4
    I used to own an '02 with a 3.8 in it. Had my fair share of problems with it, guys at AutoZone started to recognize me haha.

    Do the older 3.1 engines still have the problems that the ones the next gen GP had? I thought I read the older ones seemed to hold up a little better and didn't seem to have the same LIM gasket/head gasket issues
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: Is the 3100 engine ****? 
    I break stuff selliott's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    1,313
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    10
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Chats
    8621
    In my experience although the 2 engines share some of the same issues ie intake gaskets the 3.8 is much easier to work on. For example the 3.1 to change the lim gaskets you have to loosen the rockers and pull the push rods where as the 3.8 you do not.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: Is the 3100 engine ****? 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    canal winchester, ohio
    Posts
    147
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Chats
    0
    Mine has 147k.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: Is the 3100 engine ****? 
    GXP Level Member Turbocharged400sbc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    hangover park IL
    Posts
    2,714
    Thanks (Received)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    11
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Chats
    910
    a 94/95 regal with the 3800 is the ****, you can find the early SII 3800 L36 in em (L27 was also available iirc) and all you gotta do is splice in the nearly stand alone 98+ gp harness and shove the pcm in there

    no emissions in 49 states, clean ones still available in the south, buick luxury, plus last of the 2 door regals
    ~James~ Psychotic Gearhead
    projects: 84 Cressida waGN~ 90 LN3 3800, equal length headers, T70, 89 700r4, misc parts,
    1994 Oldsmobile 442 (462ci-4wd-2 engines) L67/4t80e^2,
    00 Turbo Regal 608 fwhp 575ftlbs at 5500rpm, 98 WhippledRiv, 97 GTP
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: Is the 3100 engine ****? 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    245
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Chats
    0
    I have had (3) 3.8L V6's in an 01 Buick, 04 impala, and 98 GP GT and the 3.8 is a good motor but I too had my fair share of issues with all of them. This constant drone of how great the 3.8 motor is over the 3.1 is more hype than anything else. The 3.8 has slightly more power than the 3.1 but neither motor is powerful. My 08 Chrysler 300 with the 3.5L DOHC 4 valve heads makes 250 hp which is 10 more HP than the mighty 3.8L supercharged engine...

    I still have an 01 GP SE with the 3.1 that I have owned since new and that motor just turned 201,000 miles and still on the OEM 4T65E tranny as well. At 192,000 miles in Dec 16, I did do the LIM gaskets due to an external coolant leak (no coolant in the oil, no oil in crankcase) since I thought the coolant leak was from the LIM gasket failing....it was not. It turned out to be the o ring seals on the coolant by pass tube under the intake manifold but I installed new Felpro LIM gasket as well and cleaned the injector and changed the injector O-rings. Going for 250,000 miles now....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: Is the 3100 engine ****? 
    I break things. WarStryker13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Frederick, MD
    Posts
    2,691
    Thanks (Received)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    38
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    Chats
    10330
    From all of GM's attempts at building a good V6, I think the 3.1 and 3.4 get honorable mentions. 3.8 gets runner up (2nd place) for factory supercharger.

    4.3L FTW!

    04 GP GT2: Handling upgrades, go-slow parts, and an attitude. Totaled.
    87 Dodge Ram 50:​ Junkyard rescue, resurrection in progress.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: Is the 3100 engine ****? 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    pittsfield ma. 01201
    Posts
    172
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Chats
    0
    Had one had to change head gaskets at 200,000 miles only major problem with this motor ran it for another 50,000 until the body was shot what a car would buy it all over again if I could
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: Is the 3100 engine ****? 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    troll land
    Posts
    1,018
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Chats
    63
    Only thing a 3100 is good for is keeping the car drivable till you 3800 swap. At the comment of "3800 only had a few more HP" HP isn't the whole story. 3800 will pretty much always walk a 3100 period. And a 3800 will always handle more abuse. And I won't ever buy from autozone again
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: Is the 3100 engine ****? 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    245
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Chats
    0
    The 3.8 and the 3.1 are BOTH slow...neither are performance engines. The 3.8 is a better base for more HP and there are a lot more parts available since it is the bigger displacement V6 but seriously......
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: Is the 3100 engine ****? 
    GXP Level Member coolone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    2,374
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Chats
    1651
    lol, 3800 not a performance engine? Lmao...

    anyways... 2001 3100 SE with 267,000+ miles on it. Got it with 36 and added everything else. Recent front cover gasket replacement and more. Typical for GP's is rust will doom car before mechanicals if taken care of.
    Overkill BBC Cam, YT 1.8 RR's, Rhodes Lifters, STGII Heads, GenV, Pacesetters, 3" Exh to Tips, TEP Trans. N*, ID 75# injectors/E85 coming soon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: Is the 3100 engine ****? 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    canal winchester, ohio
    Posts
    147
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Chats
    0
    163k on my 3100. Ticks like crazy but runs strong.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: Is the 3100 engine ****? 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    245
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Chats
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by coolone View Post
    lol, 3800 not a performance engine? Lmao...

    anyways... 2001 3100 SE with 267,000+ miles on it. Got it with 36 and added everything else. Recent front cover gasket replacement and more. Typical for GP's is rust will doom car before mechanicals if taken care of.
    Not even close to a performance engine...Nope. A V6 Camry with the 3.5L V6 has 268 Stock HP and that is not a performance engine either...There are a boat load of stock V6 engines out there that would put the 3.8L to shame and the 3.8 supercharged as well. Let's get real folks!

    My 08 Chrysler 300 with the 3.5L V6 makes 250 stock HP...Nope not a performance engine either

    Now the RWD Lexus IS350 3.5 V6 with 306 stock HP is closer to a performance engine.

    Any FWD drive platform can be made into a performance sedan of some sort with enough time, money, and effort but sort of like swimming upstream.

    The only performance mass market American sedans really are the RWD Impala SS (Australian Holden suspension and chassis), RWD Pontiac G8 V8, and the Pontiac GTO (a coupe).
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: Is the 3100 engine ****? 
    I can't car too good. SaukRapids's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    1,058
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Chats
    1417
    You're all over the board there. Guess it depends what your earmark of "performance" is.

    I see rear wheel drive = performance, apparently.

    If you're talking current foreign production vs the 3800, then you should probably include some of the more famous V8's in American Automotive history.

    Chrysler 300 V6...I don't think you'll find an argument about that thing being slow. Lol
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: Is the 3100 engine ****? 
    GTP Level Member LeadfootCJ7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    672
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Chats
    0
    They are solid. I have a 94 Cutlass 2 door as my DD. I have had it since 97 when I bought it with 50k. It currently has 246,xxx on it and still running strong. Plenty of power for getting around Houston, gets good mileage, and just keeps running. I keep thinking it will die one day, but it won't. Not to mention the parts are cheap and it's pretty easy to work on. I need to sell it soon as I need to thin the herd in the driveway, but it's a shame as it's hard since it isn't worth much and won't sell for much.
    2007 Grand Prix GXP;2002 Camaro Z28 - tune, CAI, and exhaust
    2006 GMC 2500HD - ATS high flow manifolds and uppipes, turbo back exhaust, blocked EGR, Denali headlights, Reflexxion Cown Hood
    1994 Olds Cutlass Supreme 2 door
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: Is the 3100 engine ****? 
    I break things. WarStryker13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Frederick, MD
    Posts
    2,691
    Thanks (Received)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    38
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    Chats
    10330
    My wife's 2015 Chrysler 200C has the 3.6l V6, which makes 295hp. What's the point here?

    At the time of production, the 3.1L made 160-180 hp. The 3.8L made 195-240 hp. The predecessor to the engine in my wife's car, the 3.3L and 3.8L 60° V6, made 150- 210 hp. Same time frame as the 3.1 and 3.8.

    According to the information listed above, the 3.1 made very similar power to other similar sized engines. But technology has advanced a lot in the past two decades, and modern V6's are guaranteed to make more power. The main reason is because 20 years ago, the main concern for an automobile engine wasn't how much power it could make, but how low they could make emissions and fuel consumption while still keeping decent performance. Nowadays, the focus has shifted.

    And if you've kept up on modern vehicles, you know there is now a production car that can lift the front tires off the ground straight from the factory. It has 840 hp. (hint: it's called the Demon)

    My point is, comparing the 3.1 to a modern V6, or even the 3.8, is pointless. For one, there's no replacement for displacement. Two, boost makes everything better. And three... It's an old engine, designed with old technology, and found in cheap cars. It's ok for what it is, but it's not a performance engine. (Unless you own and drive a McLaren Turbo GP, in which case the 3.1L 60° V6 IS a performance engine.) (If you own one, but don't drive it, you are a disgrace to all car enthusiasts everywhere.)

    04 GP GT2: Handling upgrades, go-slow parts, and an attitude. Totaled.
    87 Dodge Ram 50:​ Junkyard rescue, resurrection in progress.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: Is the 3100 engine ****? 
    I break things. WarStryker13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Frederick, MD
    Posts
    2,691
    Thanks (Received)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    38
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    Chats
    10330
    Quote Originally Posted by SaukRapids View Post
    Chrysler 300 V6...I don't think you'll find an argument about that thing being slow. Lol
    I can verify, with the same year, traction, and engine; (2015, 3.6L V6, AWD) the 300 is slower than the 200. It's because of the heated/cooled cup holders in the 300... Fancy isn't fast. lol

    04 GP GT2: Handling upgrades, go-slow parts, and an attitude. Totaled.
    87 Dodge Ram 50:​ Junkyard rescue, resurrection in progress.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19 Re: Is the 3100 engine ****? 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    troll land
    Posts
    1,018
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Chats
    63
    McLaren tgps aren't exactly fast lol
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20 Re: Is the 3100 engine ****? 
    I break things. WarStryker13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Frederick, MD
    Posts
    2,691
    Thanks (Received)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    38
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    Chats
    10330
    They don't need to be fast, they're just straight up cool.

    04 GP GT2: Handling upgrades, go-slow parts, and an attitude. Totaled.
    87 Dodge Ram 50:​ Junkyard rescue, resurrection in progress.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 99 GP 3100 engine noise
    By 99monte in forum 3.1L V6 (LHO/LG8)
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-08-2017, 03:49 PM
  2. 3100 engine part out
    By GR8racingfool in forum 3.1L V6 (LHO/LG8)
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-04-2016, 05:50 PM
  3. 3100 engine opinions?
    By BrianP in forum Engine
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-08-2015, 12:21 PM
  4. 2003 GP 3100 engine
    By rmr989 in forum 3.1L V6 (LHO/LG8)
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 12-26-2009, 05:21 PM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •